CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
Explore
Compare
Decide
Track
Learn
…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

Theme:
Currency:
  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. Claude 3 Opus vs Meituan: LongCat 2.0

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 17, 2026noindex (thin pair)

Claude 3 Opus vs Meituan: LongCat 2.0 benchmark

In this head-to-head showdown, Meituan: LongCat 2.0 is more budget-friendly at $1.2/1M per 1M output tokens. Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.

Executive Comparison Verdict

Bottom Line: Choose Claude 3 Opus if your priority is peak reasoning, complex code generation, and top preference Elo. Choose Meituan: LongCat 2.0 if you are optimizing for low latency, high throughput, and cost-efficient API deployment.
Share Analysis:Share:
WhatsAppTelegramXLinkedIn
Executive Verdict Summary

Meituan: LongCat 2.0 holds empirical advantage (3 of 3 metrics)

Coding / SWESWE-bench
Claude 3 OpusTop code solve rate
ReasoningGPQA / Live
Claude 3 OpusTop logical accuracy
Best Value$/1M Tok
Meituan: LongCat 2.0Lowest API billing cost
Speed / TokTok/Sec
Claude 3 OpusFastest stream rate

Verified Advantage Breakdown

3 benchmarks evaluated across capability, speed, and cost

Claude 3 Opus (0)Meituan: LongCat 2.0 (3)
Claude 3 Opus
0 of 3 Wins
Competitive baseline across remaining benchmarks
Meituan: LongCat 2.0
3 of 3 Wins
✓Input price✓Output price✓Context window
Anthropic
Claude 3 Opus

Original Claude 3 flagship. Kept so opus 3 vs later Opus and vs GPT-4o still resolve.

Elo 1,248In: $15 · Out: $75/1M
meituan
Leads 3 of 3
Meituan: LongCat 2.0

Auto-discovered from OpenRouter (meituan/longcat-2.0). Preview until a second source matches.

In: $0.3 · Out: $1.2/1M
Top Rival Showdowns for Claude 3 Opus
All Matchups
Compare vs:vs GPT-5vs Gemini 3 Provs Grok 4.6vs DeepSeek V4 Provs Qwen 3 Max
Preference Leader

No shared data

Single model data

Throughput Leader

No shared data

No latency data

Value per Dollar LeaderMeituan: LongCat 2.0 Wins

Meituan: LongCat 2.0

$1.2 / 1M output

Capability Percentiles

Relative percentile scores computed across all active models in the benchmark catalog.

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Leaders Matchup Capability Radar

Comparing top standard models across 6 key capability dimensions. Tap any spoke or dot to inspect.

Tap any node to inspect
0–100 %ile

Overall Matchup Breakdown

Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.

Claude 3 Opus (6)vsMeituan: LongCat 2.0 (3)
Claude 3 Opus: 6W (67%)Overall: Claude 3 OpusMeituan: LongCat 2.0: 3W (33%)
← Claude 3 OpusMeituan: LongCat 2.0 →
🏆Claude 3 Opus Leads(4/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Benchmark
Claude 3 OpusvsMeituan: LongCat 2.0
Preference Elo
1,248vs—
Coding Elo
—vs—
SWE-bench
38.4%vs—
LiveBench
46.2%vs—
GPQA Diamond
50.4%vs—
Claude 3 Opus: 4WMeituan: LongCat 2.0: 0W
🏆Claude 3 Opus Leads(2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Benchmark
Claude 3 OpusvsMeituan: LongCat 2.0
Output speed
48 tok/svs—
Time to first token
420 msvs—
Claude 3 Opus: 2WMeituan: LongCat 2.0: 0W
🏆Meituan: LongCat 2.0 Leads(3/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Benchmark
Claude 3 OpusvsMeituan: LongCat 2.0
Output price
$75/1Mvs$1.2/1M+$73.8/1M
Input price
$15/1Mvs$0.3/1M+$14.7/1M
Context window
200kvs1M+849k
Claude 3 Opus: 0WMeituan: LongCat 2.0: 3W

Side-by-Side Benchmark Matrix

Claude 3 OpusMeituan: LongCat 2.0
Preference Elo
Claude 3 Opus1,248
Meituan: LongCat 2.0—
LiveBench
Claude 3 Opus46.2%
Meituan: LongCat 2.0—
SWE-bench
Claude 3 Opus38.4%
Meituan: LongCat 2.0—
GPQA Diamond
Claude 3 Opus50.4%
Meituan: LongCat 2.0—
Time to first token
Claude 3 Opus420 ms
Meituan: LongCat 2.0—
Output speed
Claude 3 Opus48 tok/s
Meituan: LongCat 2.0—
Input priceMeituan: LongCat 2.0 +$14.7/1M
Claude 3 Opus$15/1M
Meituan: LongCat 2.0$0.3/1M
Output priceMeituan: LongCat 2.0 +$73.8/1M
Claude 3 Opus$75/1M
Meituan: LongCat 2.0$1.2/1M
Context windowMeituan: LongCat 2.0 +849k
Claude 3 Opus200k
Meituan: LongCat 2.01M
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusMeituan: LongCat 2.0Advantage Delta
Preference Elo
1,248
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
——
LiveBench
46.2%
livebench · Aug 17, 2026
——
SWE-bench
38.4%
swebench · Aug 17, 2026
——
GPQA Diamond
50.4%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
——
Time to first token
420 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
——
Output speed
48 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
——
Input price
$15/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
$0.3/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
+$14.7/1M
Output price
$75/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
$1.2/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
+$73.8/1M
Context window
200k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
+849k

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).

Save 98% with Meituan: LongCat 2.0
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
Claude 3 Opus$1,650.00 / mo
In: $525Out: $1,125
Meituan: LongCat 2.0$28.50 / mo
In: $10.5Out: $18
Estimated Cost Delta

Meituan: LongCat 2.0 is estimated to save $1,621.50/month ($19,458/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    Meituan: LongCat 2.0:Pick Meituan: LongCat 2.0 when you are optimizing output cost.
  • 2
    Meituan: LongCat 2.0:Pick Meituan: LongCat 2.0 for million-token RAG or long-document jobs.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsinsufficient data

Need SWE-bench on both sides.

High-volume chatMeituan: LongCat 2.0

Lower output list price ($1.2/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient data

Need TTFT on both sides.

Long-document RAGMeituan: LongCat 2.0

Larger window (1M).

Screenshots / visionClaude 3 Opus

Claude 3 Opus is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsinsufficient dataNeed SWE-bench on both sides.
High-volume chatMeituan: LongCat 2.0Lower output list price ($1.2/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient dataNeed TTFT on both sides.
Long-document RAGMeituan: LongCat 2.0Larger window (1M).
Screenshots / visionClaude 3 OpusClaude 3 Opus is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Social Share Card Preview

Dynamic OpenGraph banner generated at /compare/claude-3-opus-vs-longcat-2-0/opengraph-image

Save PNG

CompareLLM AI Matrix

Verified Head-to-Head Telemetry

LIVE BENCHMARK
VS
Anthropic

Claude 3 Opus

Elo 1,248
SWE-bench38.4%
Speed (tok/s)48 tok/s
Input / 1M Tokens$15/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$75/1M
meituan

Meituan: LongCat 2.0

Elo n/a
SWE-bench—
Speed (tok/s)1M
Input / 1M Tokens$0.3/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$1.2/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Claude 3 Opus or Meituan: LongCat 2.0?
We do not have preference Elo for both models, so we do not declare an overall winner. Compare the metrics that exist.
Which is better at coding, Claude 3 Opus or Meituan: LongCat 2.0?
SWE-bench is missing for at least one model, so we do not rank coding from a single number.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
Meituan: LongCat 2.0 output tokens are $1.2/1M versus $75/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, Claude 3 Opus or Meituan: LongCat 2.0?
We do not have TTFT for both models.
Which has the larger context window?
Meituan: LongCat 2.0 accepts 1M tokens versus 200k.
Can I self-host either model?
Neither model is marked open-weights here. You are comparing hosted APIs.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Claude 3 Opus and Meituan: LongCat 2.0 Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All Claude 3 Opus matchups →|All Meituan: LongCat 2.0 matchups →
Claude 3 Opus vs Claude Opus 4 (next opus)Claude Opus 4.5 vs Claude 3 OpusClaude Opus 4.6 vs Claude 3 OpusClaude Sonnet 4.5 vs Claude 3 OpusClaude Opus 5 vs Claude 3 OpusClaude Fable 5 vs Claude 3 Opus