Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 1, 2026
In this head-to-head showdown, Qwen 3 Max delivers higher overall intelligence and human-preferred responses (Elo 1,518 vs 1,350), while Qwen 3 Max leads in SWE-bench software engineering benchmarks (67.8%), while Qwen 3 Max is more budget-friendly at $4.8/1M per 1M output tokens, while Gemini 2.5 Pro provides faster response streaming (95 tok/s). Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.
9 direct benchmark disciplines evaluated across capability, speed, and cost
Alibaba flagship. Strong math and multilingual code.
Δ 168 Arena Elo pts
95 tok/s
$4.8 / 1M output
Relative percentile scores computed across all active models in the benchmark catalog.
Comparing top Western standard models with China's leading frontier rival across 6 skill dimensions. Tap any spoke or dot to inspect.
Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.
Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy
Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness
Cost per million tokens and max context window length
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Qwen 3 Max | Advantage Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| Preference Elo | +168 | ||
| Coding Elo | — | — | |
| LiveBench | +12.3% | ||
| SWE-bench | +4% | ||
| GPQA Diamond | +6.7% | ||
| Time to first token | +70 ms | ||
| Output speed | 95 tok/s | 80 tok/s | +15 tok/s |
| Input price | $1.25/1M | $1.2/1M | +$0.05/1M |
| Output price | $4.8/1M | +$0.2/1M | |
| Context window | +1.7M |
Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).
Qwen 3 Max is estimated to save $4.75/month ($57/year).
Higher SWE-bench (67.8%).
Lower output list price ($4.8/1M).
Lower TTFT (210 ms).
Larger window (2M).
Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (Qwen 3 Max).
| Target Workload | Recommended Pick | Evaluation Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Repo / coding agents | Qwen 3 Max | Higher SWE-bench (67.8%). |
| High-volume chat | Qwen 3 Max | Lower output list price ($4.8/1M). |
| Voice / low-latency UI | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Lower TTFT (210 ms). |
| Long-document RAG | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Larger window (2M). |
| Screenshots / vision | Qwen 3 Max | Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (Qwen 3 Max). |
Closed flagship. Strong math. Compare to Sol and Opus on GPQA and SWE-bench, not on brand heat.
Sep 2025 open-weight mixture-of-experts. Self-host path. Don’t confuse it with Qwen 3 Max.
2025-03 row. 3.x Pro replaced it. Kept for old “2.5 pro vs gpt-4o” inbound.
No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!
Dynamic OpenGraph banner generated at /compare/gemini-2-5-pro-vs-qwen-3-max/opengraph-image
Verified Head-to-Head Telemetry