Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 1, 2026
In this head-to-head showdown, Qwen3 235B delivers higher overall intelligence and human-preferred responses (Elo 1,440 vs 1,350), while Gemini 2.5 Pro leads in SWE-bench software engineering benchmarks (63.8%), while Qwen3 235B is more budget-friendly at $0.88/1M per 1M output tokens, while Gemini 2.5 Pro provides faster response streaming (95 tok/s). Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.
9 direct benchmark disciplines evaluated across capability, speed, and cost
Open-weight Qwen3 mixture-of-experts.
Currently comparing Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Qwen3 235B. Alternative family tiers available.
Δ 90 Arena Elo pts
95 tok/s
$0.88 / 1M output
Relative percentile scores computed across all active models in the benchmark catalog.
Comparing top Western standard models with China's leading frontier rival across 6 skill dimensions. Tap any spoke or dot to inspect.
Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.
Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy
Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness
Cost per million tokens and max context window length
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Qwen3 235B | Advantage Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| Preference Elo | +90 | ||
| LiveBench | +6.4% | ||
| SWE-bench | +4.4% | ||
| GPQA Diamond | +0.4% | ||
| Time to first token | +110 ms | ||
| Output speed | 95 tok/s | 74 tok/s | +21 tok/s |
| Input price | $1.25/1M | $0.22/1M | +$1.03/1M |
| Output price | $0.88/1M | +$4.12/1M | |
| Context window | +1.9M |
Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).
Qwen3 235B is estimated to save $97.85/month ($1,174/year).
Higher SWE-bench (63.8%).
Lower output list price ($0.88/1M).
Lower TTFT (210 ms).
Larger window (2M).
Gemini 2.5 Pro is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.
| Target Workload | Recommended Pick | Evaluation Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Repo / coding agents | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Higher SWE-bench (63.8%). |
| High-volume chat | Qwen3 235B | Lower output list price ($0.88/1M). |
| Voice / low-latency UI | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Lower TTFT (210 ms). |
| Long-document RAG | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Larger window (2M). |
| Screenshots / vision | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Gemini 2.5 Pro is the side marked multimodal in the catalog. |
Sep 2025 open-weight mixture-of-experts. Self-host path. Don’t confuse it with Qwen 3 Max.
2025-03 row. 3.x Pro replaced it. Kept for old “2.5 pro vs gpt-4o” inbound.
No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!
Dynamic OpenGraph banner generated at /compare/gemini-2-5-pro-vs-qwen-3-235b/opengraph-image
Verified Head-to-Head Telemetry
