CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
Explore
Compare
Decide
Track
Learn
…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

Theme:
Currency:
  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. DeepSeek Coder V2 vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 17, 2026noindex (thin pair)

DeepSeek Coder V2 vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B benchmark

In this head-to-head showdown, DeepSeek Coder V2 is more budget-friendly at $0.28/1M per 1M output tokens. Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.

Executive Comparison Verdict

Bottom Line: Both DeepSeek Coder V2 and Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B present distinct architectural strengths. Compare the verified benchmark matrix below to choose the model tailored to your specific application requirements.
Share Analysis:Share:
WhatsAppTelegramXLinkedIn
Executive Verdict Summary

DeepSeek Coder V2 holds empirical advantage (1 of 2 metrics)

Coding / SWESWE-bench
DeepSeek Coder V2Top code solve rate
ReasoningGPQA / Live
DeepSeek Coder V2Top logical accuracy
Best Value$/1M Tok
DeepSeek Coder V2Lowest API billing cost
Speed / TokTok/Sec
DeepSeek Coder V2Fastest stream rate

Verified Advantage Breakdown

2 benchmarks evaluated across capability, speed, and cost

DeepSeek Coder V2 (1)Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B (1)
DeepSeek Coder V2
1 of 2 Wins
✓Output price
Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B
1 of 2 Wins
✓Context window
DeepSeek
Leads 1 of 2
DeepSeek Coder V2

DeepSeek open-weight Mixture-of-Experts coding model supporting 338 programming languages and 128k context.

Elo 1,365In: $0.14 · Out: $0.28/1M
Alibaba
Leads 1 of 2
Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B

Auto-discovered from OpenRouter (qwen/qwen3.6-35b-a3b). Preview until a second source matches.

In: $0.14 · Out: $1/1M
Top Rival Showdowns for DeepSeek Coder V2
All Matchups
Compare vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5vs GPT-5vs Gemini 3 Provs Grok 4.6vs Qwen 3 Max
Preference Leader

No shared data

Single model data

Throughput Leader

No shared data

No latency data

Value per Dollar LeaderDeepSeek Coder V2 Wins

DeepSeek Coder V2

$0.28 / 1M output

Capability Percentiles

Relative percentile scores computed across all active models in the benchmark catalog.

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Leaders Matchup Capability Radar

Comparing top standard models across 6 key capability dimensions. Tap any spoke or dot to inspect.

Tap any node to inspect
0–100 %ile

Overall Matchup Breakdown

Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.

DeepSeek Coder V2 (8)vsQwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B (1)
DeepSeek Coder V2: 8W (89%)Overall: DeepSeek Coder V2Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B: 1W (11%)
← DeepSeek Coder V21 tiesQwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B →
🏆DeepSeek Coder V2 Leads(5/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Benchmark
DeepSeek Coder V2vsQwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B
Preference Elo
1,365vs—
Coding Elo
1,442vs—
SWE-bench
60.5%vs—
LiveBench
58.6%vs—
GPQA Diamond
70.2%vs—
DeepSeek Coder V2: 5WQwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B: 0W
🏆DeepSeek Coder V2 Leads(2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Benchmark
DeepSeek Coder V2vsQwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B
Output speed
75 tok/svs—
Time to first token
290 msvs—
DeepSeek Coder V2: 2WQwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B: 0W
Tied (1-1)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Benchmark
DeepSeek Coder V2vsQwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B
Output price
$0.28/1Mvs$1/1M+$0.72/1M
Input price
$0.14/1Mvs$0.14/1M
Context window
128kvs262k+134k
DeepSeek Coder V2: 1WQwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B: 1W

Side-by-Side Benchmark Matrix

DeepSeek Coder V2Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B
Preference Elo
DeepSeek Coder V21,365
Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B—
Coding Elo
DeepSeek Coder V21,442
Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B—
LiveBench
DeepSeek Coder V258.6%
Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B—
SWE-bench
DeepSeek Coder V260.5%
Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B—
GPQA Diamond
DeepSeek Coder V270.2%
Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B—
Time to first token
DeepSeek Coder V2290 ms
Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B—
Output speed
DeepSeek Coder V275 tok/s
Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B—
Input price
DeepSeek Coder V2$0.14/1M
Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B$0.14/1M
Output priceDeepSeek Coder V2 +$0.72/1M
DeepSeek Coder V2$0.28/1M
Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B$1/1M
Context windowQwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B +134k
DeepSeek Coder V2128k
Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B262k
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder V2Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3BAdvantage Delta
Preference Elo
1,365
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
——
Coding Elo
1,442
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
——
LiveBench
58.6%
livebench · Aug 17, 2026
——
SWE-bench
60.5%
swebench · Aug 17, 2026
——
GPQA Diamond
70.2%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
——
Time to first token
290 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
——
Output speed
75 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
——
Input price
$0.14/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
$0.14/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
—
Output price
$0.28/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
$1/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
+$0.72/1M
Context window
128k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
262k
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
+134k

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).

Save 54% with DeepSeek Coder V2
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
DeepSeek Coder V2$9.10 / mo
In: $4.9Out: $4.2
Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B$19.90 / mo
In: $4.9Out: $15
Estimated Cost Delta

DeepSeek Coder V2 is estimated to save $10.80/month ($130/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    DeepSeek Coder V2:Pick DeepSeek Coder V2 when you are optimizing output cost.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsinsufficient data

Need SWE-bench on both sides.

High-volume chatDeepSeek Coder V2

Lower output list price ($0.28/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient data

Need TTFT on both sides.

Long-document RAGQwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B

Larger window (262k).

Screenshots / visionQwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B

Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsinsufficient dataNeed SWE-bench on both sides.
High-volume chatDeepSeek Coder V2Lower output list price ($0.28/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient dataNeed TTFT on both sides.
Long-document RAGQwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3BLarger window (262k).
Screenshots / visionQwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3BQwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Social Share Card Preview

Dynamic OpenGraph banner generated at /compare/deepseek-coder-v2-vs-qwen3-6-35b-a3b/opengraph-image

Save PNG

CompareLLM AI Matrix

Verified Head-to-Head Telemetry

LIVE BENCHMARK
VS
DeepSeek

DeepSeek Coder V2

Elo 1,365
SWE-bench60.5%
Speed (tok/s)75 tok/s
Input / 1M Tokens$0.14/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$0.28/1M
Alibaba

Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B

Elo n/a
SWE-bench—
Speed (tok/s)262k
Input / 1M Tokens$0.14/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$1/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, DeepSeek Coder V2 or Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B?
We do not have preference Elo for both models, so we do not declare an overall winner. Compare the metrics that exist.
Which is better at coding, DeepSeek Coder V2 or Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B?
SWE-bench is missing for at least one model, so we do not rank coding from a single number.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
DeepSeek Coder V2 output tokens are $0.28/1M versus $1/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, DeepSeek Coder V2 or Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B?
We do not have TTFT for both models.
Which has the larger context window?
Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B accepts 262k tokens versus 128k.
Can I self-host either model?
DeepSeek Coder V2 is marked open-weights in our catalog. The other side is a closed API. Check the provider license before you ship weights.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. DeepSeek Coder V2 and Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All DeepSeek Coder V2 matchups →|All Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B matchups →
DeepSeek Coder V2 vs DeepSeek V3 (next deepseek)DeepSeek V4 Flash vs DeepSeek Coder V2Qwen QwQ 32B vs DeepSeek Coder V2Qwen 3 Max vs DeepSeek Coder V2DeepSeek V4 Pro vs DeepSeek Coder V2DeepSeek R1 vs DeepSeek Coder V2