CompareLLM.ai
Live
Leaderboard
Models
Compare
Best of & Stacks
Research & News
…
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

Theme:
Currency:
  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. DeepSeek Coder V2 vs DeepSeek R1

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 1, 2026

DeepSeek Coder V2 vs DeepSeek R1 benchmark

In this head-to-head showdown, DeepSeek Coder V2 delivers higher overall intelligence and human-preferred responses (Elo 1,365 vs 1,358), while DeepSeek R1 leads in SWE-bench software engineering benchmarks (65.2%), while DeepSeek Coder V2 is more budget-friendly at $0.28/1M per 1M output tokens. Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.

Executive Comparison Verdict

Bottom Line: DeepSeek Coder V2 holds the advantage over DeepSeek R1 in overall benchmark performance and human evaluation rankings. Choose DeepSeek Coder V2 for demanding workloads, or review the breakdown below to compare coding and pricing metrics.
Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramXLinkedInReddit

Verified Head-to-Head Advantage Breakdown

8 direct benchmark disciplines evaluated across capability, speed, and cost

DeepSeek Coder V2 (5)DeepSeek R1 (3)
DeepSeek Coder V2
5 of 8 Wins
✓Preference Elo✓Time to first token✓Output speed✓Input price✓Output price
DeepSeek R1
3 of 8 Wins
✓LiveBench✓SWE-bench✓GPQA Diamond
DeepSeek
Leads 5 of 8 metrics
DeepSeek Coder V2

DeepSeek open-weight Mixture-of-Experts coding model supporting 338 programming languages and 128k context.

Elo 1,365$0.28/1M out
DeepSeek
Leads 3 of 8 metrics
DeepSeek R1

Open-weights reasoning model trained with large-scale RL.

Elo 1,358$2.19/1M out

DeepSeek R1 Thinking Depth & Cost Scaler

Model B

Simulate accuracy gains vs added response time & token cost

Mode: Medium (Full RL CoT)

Reasoning models “think before answering” by generating internal reasoning tokens. Higher effort improves math, coding, and logic accuracy, but increases response delay and token costs.

Thinking Delay
420 ms
Standard speed
Reasoning Depth
~2,800
Internal tokens
Cost / 1k Calls
$7.06
7.6× standard bill
Accuracy Boost
+6.5% accuracy
STEM & SWE-bench
Top Rival Showdowns for DeepSeek Coder V2
All Matchups
Compare vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5vs GPT-5vs Gemini 3 Provs Grok 4.6vs Qwen 3 Max
Preference LeaderDeepSeek Coder V2 Wins

DeepSeek Coder V2

Δ 7 Arena Elo pts

Throughput LeaderDeepSeek Coder V2 Wins

DeepSeek Coder V2

75 tok/s

Value per Dollar LeaderDeepSeek Coder V2 Wins

DeepSeek Coder V2

$0.28 / 1M output

Capability Percentiles

Relative percentile scores computed across all active models in the benchmark catalog.

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Leaders Matchup Capability Radar

Comparing top Western standard models with China's leading frontier rival across 6 skill dimensions. Tap any spoke or dot to inspect.

Tap any node to inspect
Percentile 0–100
Head-to-Head Comparison

Overall Matchup Breakdown

Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.

DeepSeek Coder V2 (6)vsDeepSeek R1 (3)
DeepSeek Coder V2: 6W (67%)Overall: DeepSeek Coder V2DeepSeek R1: 3W (33%)
← DeepSeek Coder V21 tiesDeepSeek R1 →
🏆DeepSeek R1(3/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Benchmark
DeepSeek Coder V2vsDeepSeek R1
Preference Elo
1,365vs1,358+7
Coding Elo
1,442vs—
SWE-bench
60.5%vs65.2%+4.7%
LiveBench
58.6%vs59%+0.4%
GPQA Diamond
70.2%vs79.8%+9.6%
DeepSeek Coder V2: 2WDeepSeek R1: 3W
🏆DeepSeek Coder V2(2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Benchmark
DeepSeek Coder V2vsDeepSeek R1
Output speed
75 tok/svs62 tok/s+13 tok/s
Time to first token
290 msvs420 ms+130 ms
DeepSeek Coder V2: 2WDeepSeek R1: 0W
🏆DeepSeek Coder V2(2/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Benchmark
DeepSeek Coder V2vsDeepSeek R1
Output price
$0.28/1Mvs$2.19/1M+$1.91/1M
Input price
$0.14/1Mvs$0.55/1M+$0.41/1M
Context window
128kvs128k
DeepSeek Coder V2: 2WDeepSeek R1: 0W

Side-by-Side Benchmark Matrix

Preference Elo+7
DeepSeek Coder V21,365
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
DeepSeek R11,358
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Coding Elo
DeepSeek Coder V21,442
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
DeepSeek R1—
LiveBench+0.4%
DeepSeek Coder V258.6%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
DeepSeek R159%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
SWE-bench+4.7%
DeepSeek Coder V260.5%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
DeepSeek R165.2%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
GPQA Diamond+9.6%
DeepSeek Coder V270.2%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
DeepSeek R179.8%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Time to first token+130 ms
DeepSeek Coder V2290 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
DeepSeek R1420 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Output speed+13 tok/s
DeepSeek Coder V275 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
DeepSeek R162 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Input price+$0.41/1M
DeepSeek Coder V2$0.14/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
DeepSeek R1$0.55/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Output price+$1.91/1M
DeepSeek Coder V2$0.28/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
DeepSeek R1$2.19/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Context window
DeepSeek Coder V2128k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
DeepSeek R1128k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder V2DeepSeek R1Advantage Delta
Preference Elo
1,365
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
1,358
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+7
Coding Elo
1,442
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
——
LiveBench
58.6%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
59%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+0.4%
SWE-bench
60.5%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
65.2%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+4.7%
GPQA Diamond
70.2%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
79.8%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+9.6%
Time to first token
290 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
420 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+130 ms
Output speed
75 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
62 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+13 tok/s
Input price
$0.14/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
$0.55/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+$0.41/1M
Output price
$0.28/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
$2.19/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+$1.91/1M
Context window
128k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
128k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
—
Interactive Simulator (USD)

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).

Save up to 83% with DeepSeek Coder V2
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
DeepSeek Coder V2$9.10 / mo
In: $4.9Out: $4.2
DeepSeek R1$52.10 / mo
In: $19.25Out: $32.85
Estimated Cost Delta

DeepSeek Coder V2 is estimated to save $43.00/month ($516/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    DeepSeek R1:Pick DeepSeek R1 when repo-level coding accuracy is the constraint.
  • 2
    DeepSeek Coder V2:Pick DeepSeek Coder V2 when you are optimizing output cost.
  • 3
    DeepSeek Coder V2:Pick DeepSeek Coder V2 when time-to-first-token matters more than peak Elo.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsDeepSeek R1

Higher SWE-bench (65.2%).

High-volume chatDeepSeek Coder V2

Lower output list price ($0.28/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIDeepSeek Coder V2

Lower TTFT (290 ms).

Long-document RAGDeepSeek Coder V2

Larger window (128k).

Screenshots / visionDeepSeek Coder V2

DeepSeek Coder V2 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsDeepSeek R1Higher SWE-bench (65.2%).
High-volume chatDeepSeek Coder V2Lower output list price ($0.28/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIDeepSeek Coder V2Lower TTFT (290 ms).
Long-document RAGDeepSeek Coder V2Larger window (128k).
Screenshots / visionDeepSeek Coder V2DeepSeek Coder V2 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

View all news
launchJan 20, 2025

DeepSeek R1 stays as the open-weights RL baseline

Jan 2025 reasoning model. Still searched. V4 Pro is the newer DeepSeek buy.

Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Social Share Card Preview

Dynamic OpenGraph banner generated at /compare/deepseek-coder-v2-vs-deepseek-r1/opengraph-image

Save PNG

CompareLLM AI Matrix

Verified Head-to-Head Telemetry

LIVE BENCHMARK
VS
DeepSeek

DeepSeek Coder V2

Elo 1,365
SWE-bench60.5%
Speed (tok/s)75 tok/s
Input / 1M Tokens$0.14/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$0.28/1M
DeepSeek

DeepSeek R1

Elo 1,358
SWE-bench65.2%
Speed (tok/s)62 tok/s
Input / 1M Tokens$0.55/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$2.19/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, DeepSeek Coder V2 or DeepSeek R1?
DeepSeek Coder V2 has the higher preference Elo in our latest snapshot (1,365). “Better” still depends on coding, price, and latency — see the table.
Which is better at coding, DeepSeek Coder V2 or DeepSeek R1?
DeepSeek R1 leads SWE-bench at 65.2% vs 60.5%. SWE-bench is one harness, not your repo.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
DeepSeek Coder V2 output tokens are $0.28/1M versus $2.19/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, DeepSeek Coder V2 or DeepSeek R1?
DeepSeek Coder V2 has the lower time-to-first-token (290 ms vs 420 ms). Tokens/sec is a separate column if you care about long completions.
Which has the larger context window?
DeepSeek Coder V2 accepts 128k tokens versus 128k.
Can I self-host either model?
Both DeepSeek Coder V2 and DeepSeek R1 are marked open-weights. Hosting cost is not in this table.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. DeepSeek Coder V2 and DeepSeek R1 Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Related news

  • launch · Jan 20, 2025

    DeepSeek R1 stays as the open-weights RL baseline

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All DeepSeek Coder V2 matchups →|All DeepSeek R1 matchups →
DeepSeek Coder V2 vs DeepSeek V3 (next deepseek)DeepSeek R1 vs DeepSeek V3 (previous deepseek)DeepSeek R1 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro (next deepseek)DeepSeek V4 Flash vs DeepSeek Coder V2DeepSeek V4 Pro vs DeepSeek Coder V2Llama 4 Maverick vs DeepSeek Coder V2