CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
Explore
Compare
Decide
Track
Learn
…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

Theme:
Currency:
  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. Command A vs Nous: Hermes 3 405B Instruct

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 17, 2026noindex (thin pair)

Command A vs Nous: Hermes 3 405B Instruct benchmark

In this head-to-head showdown, Nous: Hermes 3 405B Instruct is more budget-friendly at $1/1M per 1M output tokens. Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.

Executive Comparison Verdict

Bottom Line: Choose Command A if your priority is peak reasoning, complex code generation, and top preference Elo. Choose Nous: Hermes 3 405B Instruct if you are optimizing for low latency, high throughput, and cost-efficient API deployment.
Share Analysis:Share:
WhatsAppTelegramXLinkedIn
Executive Verdict Summary

Nous: Hermes 3 405B Instruct holds empirical advantage (2 of 3 metrics)

Coding / SWESWE-bench
Command ATop code solve rate
ReasoningGPQA / Live
Command ATop logical accuracy
Best Value$/1M Tok
Nous: Hermes 3 405B InstructLowest API billing cost
Speed / TokTok/Sec
Command AFastest stream rate

Verified Advantage Breakdown

3 benchmarks evaluated across capability, speed, and cost

Command A (1)Nous: Hermes 3 405B Instruct (2)
Command A
1 of 3 Wins
✓Context window
Nous: Hermes 3 405B Instruct
2 of 3 Wins
✓Input price✓Output price
Cohere
Leads 1 of 3
Command A

Cohere enterprise RAG and tool-use model.

Elo 1,344In: $2.5 · Out: $10/1M
nousresearch
Leads 2 of 3
Nous: Hermes 3 405B Instruct

Auto-discovered from OpenRouter (nousresearch/hermes-3-llama-3.1-405b). Preview until a second source matches.

In: $1 · Out: $1/1M
Top Rival Showdowns for Command A
All Matchups
Compare vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5vs GPT-5vs Gemini 3 Provs Grok 4.6vs DeepSeek V4 Pro
Preference Leader

No shared data

Single model data

Throughput Leader

No shared data

No latency data

Value per Dollar LeaderNous: Hermes 3 405B Instruct Wins

Nous: Hermes 3 405B Instruct

$1 / 1M output

Capability Percentiles

Relative percentile scores computed across all active models in the benchmark catalog.

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Leaders Matchup Capability Radar

Comparing top standard models across 6 key capability dimensions. Tap any spoke or dot to inspect.

Tap any node to inspect
0–100 %ile

Overall Matchup Breakdown

Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.

Command A (7)vsNous: Hermes 3 405B Instruct (2)
Command A: 7W (78%)Overall: Command ANous: Hermes 3 405B Instruct: 2W (22%)
← Command ANous: Hermes 3 405B Instruct →
🏆Command A Leads(4/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Benchmark
Command AvsNous: Hermes 3 405B Instruct
Preference Elo
1,344vs—
Coding Elo
—vs—
SWE-bench
42.6%vs—
LiveBench
56.2%vs—
GPQA Diamond
66%vs—
Command A: 4WNous: Hermes 3 405B Instruct: 0W
🏆Command A Leads(2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Benchmark
Command AvsNous: Hermes 3 405B Instruct
Output speed
118 tok/svs—
Time to first token
175 msvs—
Command A: 2WNous: Hermes 3 405B Instruct: 0W
🏆Nous: Hermes 3 405B Instruct Leads(2/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Benchmark
Command AvsNous: Hermes 3 405B Instruct
Output price
$10/1Mvs$1/1M+$9/1M
Input price
$2.5/1Mvs$1/1M+$1.5/1M
Context window
256kvs131k+125k
Command A: 1WNous: Hermes 3 405B Instruct: 2W

Side-by-Side Benchmark Matrix

Command ANous: Hermes 3 405B Instruct
Preference Elo
Command A1,344
Nous: Hermes 3 405B Instruct—
LiveBench
Command A56.2%
Nous: Hermes 3 405B Instruct—
SWE-bench
Command A42.6%
Nous: Hermes 3 405B Instruct—
GPQA Diamond
Command A66%
Nous: Hermes 3 405B Instruct—
Time to first token
Command A175 ms
Nous: Hermes 3 405B Instruct—
Output speed
Command A118 tok/s
Nous: Hermes 3 405B Instruct—
Input priceNous: Hermes 3 405B Instruct +$1.5/1M
Command A$2.5/1M
Nous: Hermes 3 405B Instruct$1/1M
Output priceNous: Hermes 3 405B Instruct +$9/1M
Command A$10/1M
Nous: Hermes 3 405B Instruct$1/1M
Context windowCommand A +125k
Command A256k
Nous: Hermes 3 405B Instruct131k
BenchmarkCommand ANous: Hermes 3 405B InstructAdvantage Delta
Preference Elo
1,344
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
——
LiveBench
56.2%
livebench · Aug 17, 2026
——
SWE-bench
42.6%
swebench · Aug 17, 2026
——
GPQA Diamond
66%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
——
Time to first token
175 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
——
Output speed
118 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
——
Input price
$2.5/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
$1/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
+$1.5/1M
Output price
$10/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
$1/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
+$9/1M
Context window
256k
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
131k
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
+125k

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).

Save 79% with Nous: Hermes 3 405B Instruct
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
Command A$237.50 / mo
In: $87.5Out: $150
Nous: Hermes 3 405B Instruct$50.00 / mo
In: $35Out: $15
Estimated Cost Delta

Nous: Hermes 3 405B Instruct is estimated to save $187.50/month ($2,250/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    Nous: Hermes 3 405B Instruct:Pick Nous: Hermes 3 405B Instruct when you are optimizing output cost.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsinsufficient data

Need SWE-bench on both sides.

High-volume chatNous: Hermes 3 405B Instruct

Lower output list price ($1/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient data

Need TTFT on both sides.

Long-document RAGCommand A

Larger window (256k).

Screenshots / visionNous: Hermes 3 405B Instruct

Nous: Hermes 3 405B Instruct is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsinsufficient dataNeed SWE-bench on both sides.
High-volume chatNous: Hermes 3 405B InstructLower output list price ($1/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient dataNeed TTFT on both sides.
Long-document RAGCommand ALarger window (256k).
Screenshots / visionNous: Hermes 3 405B InstructNous: Hermes 3 405B Instruct is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

View all news
launchMar 13, 2025

Command A: Cohere’s enterprise RAG and tool-use row

Mar 2025. RAG and tools, not a frontier Elo play. Listed so “command a benchmark” has a sourced page.

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Social Share Card Preview

Dynamic OpenGraph banner generated at /compare/command-a-vs-hermes-3-llama-3-1-405b/opengraph-image

Save PNG

CompareLLM AI Matrix

Verified Head-to-Head Telemetry

LIVE BENCHMARK
VS
Cohere

Command A

Elo 1,344
SWE-bench42.6%
Speed (tok/s)118 tok/s
Input / 1M Tokens$2.5/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$10/1M
nousresearch

Nous: Hermes 3 405B Instruct

Elo n/a
SWE-bench—
Speed (tok/s)131k
Input / 1M Tokens$1/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$1/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Command A or Nous: Hermes 3 405B Instruct?
We do not have preference Elo for both models, so we do not declare an overall winner. Compare the metrics that exist.
Which is better at coding, Command A or Nous: Hermes 3 405B Instruct?
SWE-bench is missing for at least one model, so we do not rank coding from a single number.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
Nous: Hermes 3 405B Instruct output tokens are $1/1M versus $10/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, Command A or Nous: Hermes 3 405B Instruct?
We do not have TTFT for both models.
Which has the larger context window?
Command A accepts 256k tokens versus 131k.
Can I self-host either model?
Neither model is marked open-weights here. You are comparing hosted APIs.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Command A and Nous: Hermes 3 405B Instruct Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Related news

  • launch · Mar 13, 2025

    Command A: Cohere’s enterprise RAG and tool-use row

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All Command A matchups →|All Nous: Hermes 3 405B Instruct matchups →
Mistral Large 3 vs Command ADoubao Pro 1.5 vs Command AYi-Lightning vs Command AGemini 2.0 Flash Thinking vs Command AGemini 3 Flash vs Command AClaude Opus 4.5 vs Command A