CompareLLM.ai
Live
Leaderboard
Models
Compare
Best of & Stacks
Research & News
…
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

Theme:
Currency:
  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. Command A vs GPT-5

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 1, 2026

Command A vs GPT-5 benchmark

In this head-to-head showdown, GPT-5 delivers higher overall intelligence and human-preferred responses (Elo 1,558 vs 1,344), while GPT-5 leads in SWE-bench software engineering benchmarks (68.4%), while Command A is more budget-friendly at $10/1M per 1M output tokens. Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.

Executive Comparison Verdict

Bottom Line: Choose GPT-5 if your priority is peak reasoning, complex code generation, and top preference Elo. Choose Command A if you are optimizing for low latency, high throughput, and cost-efficient API deployment.
Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramXLinkedInReddit

Verified Head-to-Head Advantage Breakdown

9 direct benchmark disciplines evaluated across capability, speed, and cost

Command A (4)GPT-5 (5)
Command A
4 of 9 Wins
✓Time to first token✓Output speed✓Input price✓Output price
GPT-5
5 of 9 Wins
✓Preference Elo✓LiveBench✓SWE-bench✓GPQA Diamond✓Context window
Cohere
Leads 4 of 9 metrics
Command A

Cohere enterprise RAG and tool-use model.

Elo 1,344$10/1M out
OpenAI
Leads 5 of 9 metrics
GPT-5

OpenAI flagship reasoning model for 2025–26. Strong general preference Elo and multimodal coverage.

Elo 1,558$20/1M out

GPT-5 Thinking Depth & Cost Scaler

Model B

Simulate accuracy gains vs added response time & token cost

Mode: Medium (Standard)

Reasoning models “think before answering” by generating internal reasoning tokens. Higher effort improves math, coding, and logic accuracy, but increases response delay and token costs.

Thinking Delay
290 ms
Standard speed
Reasoning Depth
~1,500
Internal tokens
Cost / 1k Calls
$38.50
4.5× standard bill
Accuracy Boost
+4.5% accuracy
STEM & SWE-bench
Top Rival Showdowns for Command A
All Matchups
Compare vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5vs GPT-5 minivs Gemini 3 Provs Grok 4.6vs DeepSeek V4 Pro
Preference LeaderGPT-5 Wins

GPT-5

Δ 214 Arena Elo pts

Throughput LeaderCommand A Wins

Command A

118 tok/s

Value per Dollar LeaderCommand A Wins

Command A

$10 / 1M output

Capability Percentiles

Relative percentile scores computed across all active models in the benchmark catalog.

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Leaders Matchup Capability Radar

Comparing top Western standard models with China's leading frontier rival across 6 skill dimensions. Tap any spoke or dot to inspect.

Tap any node to inspect
Percentile 0–100
Head-to-Head Comparison

Overall Matchup Breakdown

Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.

Command A (4)vsGPT-5 (6)
Command A: 4W (40%)Overall: GPT-5GPT-5: 6W (60%)
← Command AGPT-5 →
🏆GPT-5(5/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Benchmark
Command AvsGPT-5
Preference Elo
1,344vs1,558+214
Coding Elo
—vs1,540
SWE-bench
42.6%vs68.4%+25.8%
LiveBench
56.2%vs69.8%+13.6%
GPQA Diamond
66%vs85.2%+19.2%
Command A: 0WGPT-5: 5W
🏆Command A(2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Benchmark
Command AvsGPT-5
Output speed
118 tok/svs78 tok/s+40 tok/s
Time to first token
175 msvs290 ms+115 ms
Command A: 2WGPT-5: 0W
🏆Command A(2/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Benchmark
Command AvsGPT-5
Output price
$10/1Mvs$20/1M+$10/1M
Input price
$2.5/1Mvs$5/1M+$2.5/1M
Context window
256kvs400k+144k
Command A: 2WGPT-5: 1W

Side-by-Side Benchmark Matrix

Preference Elo+214
Command A1,344
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
GPT-51,558
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Coding Elo
Command A—
GPT-51,540
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
LiveBench+13.6%
Command A56.2%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
GPT-569.8%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
SWE-bench+25.8%
Command A42.6%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
GPT-568.4%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
GPQA Diamond+19.2%
Command A66%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
GPT-585.2%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Time to first token+115 ms
Command A175 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
GPT-5290 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Output speed+40 tok/s
Command A118 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
GPT-578 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Input price+$2.5/1M
Command A$2.5/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
GPT-5$5/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Output price+$10/1M
Command A$10/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
GPT-5$20/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Context window+144k
Command A256k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
GPT-5400k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
BenchmarkCommand AGPT-5Advantage Delta
Preference Elo
1,344
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
1,558
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+214
Coding Elo—
1,540
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
—
LiveBench
56.2%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
69.8%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+13.6%
SWE-bench
42.6%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
68.4%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+25.8%
GPQA Diamond
66%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
85.2%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+19.2%
Time to first token
175 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
290 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+115 ms
Output speed
118 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
78 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+40 tok/s
Input price
$2.5/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
$5/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+$2.5/1M
Output price
$10/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
$20/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+$10/1M
Context window
256k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
400k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+144k
Interactive Simulator (USD)

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).

Save up to 50% with Command A
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
Command A$237.50 / mo
In: $87.5Out: $150
GPT-5$475.00 / mo
In: $175Out: $300
Estimated Cost Delta

Command A is estimated to save $237.50/month ($2,850/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    GPT-5:Pick GPT-5 when repo-level coding accuracy is the constraint.
  • 2
    Command A:Pick Command A when you are optimizing output cost.
  • 3
    Command A:Pick Command A when time-to-first-token matters more than peak Elo.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsGPT-5

Higher SWE-bench (68.4%).

High-volume chatCommand A

Lower output list price ($10/1M).

Voice / low-latency UICommand A

Lower TTFT (175 ms).

Long-document RAGGPT-5

Larger window (400k).

Screenshots / visionGPT-5

GPT-5 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsGPT-5Higher SWE-bench (68.4%).
High-volume chatCommand ALower output list price ($10/1M).
Voice / low-latency UICommand ALower TTFT (175 ms).
Long-document RAGGPT-5Larger window (400k).
Screenshots / visionGPT-5GPT-5 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

View all news
launchAug 8, 2025

GPT-5 (2025) remains the legacy OpenAI flagship baseline

Still a common compare target. 5.6 Sol replaced it as the buy; GPT-5 stays for old URLs.

launchMar 13, 2025

Command A: Cohere’s enterprise RAG and tool-use row

Mar 2025. RAG and tools, not a frontier Elo play. Listed so “command a benchmark” has a sourced page.

Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Social Share Card Preview

Dynamic OpenGraph banner generated at /compare/command-a-vs-gpt-5/opengraph-image

Save PNG

CompareLLM AI Matrix

Verified Head-to-Head Telemetry

LIVE BENCHMARK
VS
Cohere

Command A

Elo 1,344
SWE-bench42.6%
Speed (tok/s)118 tok/s
Input / 1M Tokens$2.5/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$10/1M
OpenAI

GPT-5

Elo 1,558
SWE-bench68.4%
Speed (tok/s)78 tok/s
Input / 1M Tokens$5/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$20/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Command A or GPT-5?
GPT-5 has the higher preference Elo in our latest snapshot (1,558). “Better” still depends on coding, price, and latency — see the table.
Which is better at coding, Command A or GPT-5?
GPT-5 leads SWE-bench at 68.4% vs 42.6%. SWE-bench is one harness, not your repo.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
Command A output tokens are $10/1M versus $20/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, Command A or GPT-5?
Command A has the lower time-to-first-token (175 ms vs 290 ms). Tokens/sec is a separate column if you care about long completions.
Which has the larger context window?
GPT-5 accepts 400k tokens versus 256k.
Can I self-host either model?
Neither model is marked open-weights here. You are comparing hosted APIs.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Command A and GPT-5 Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Related news

  • launch · Aug 8, 2025

    GPT-5 (2025) remains the legacy OpenAI flagship baseline

  • launch · Mar 13, 2025

    Command A: Cohere’s enterprise RAG and tool-use row

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All Command A matchups →|All GPT-5 matchups →
GPT-5 vs GPT-4.5 Orion (previous gpt-flagship)GPT-5 vs GPT-5.6 Sol (next gpt-flagship)OpenAI o3-mini vs GPT-5GPT-5.6 Terra vs GPT-5GPT-4o vs Command AGPT-5 mini vs Command A