Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 1, 2026
In this head-to-head showdown, Claude Sonnet 4.5 delivers higher overall intelligence and human-preferred responses (Elo 1,524 vs 1,488), while Claude Sonnet 4.5 leads in SWE-bench software engineering benchmarks (70.1%), while Claude Sonnet 4.5 is more budget-friendly at $15/1M per 1M output tokens, while Grok 4 provides faster response streaming (98 tok/s). Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.
7 direct benchmark disciplines evaluated across capability, speed, and cost
Workhorse Anthropic model: most of Opus coding quality at a mid-tier price.
Currently comparing Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Grok 4. Alternative family tiers available.
Δ 36 Arena Elo pts
98 tok/s
$15 / 1M output
Relative percentile scores computed across all active models in the benchmark catalog.
Comparing top Western standard models with China's leading frontier rival across 6 skill dimensions. Tap any spoke or dot to inspect.
Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.
Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy
Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness
Cost per million tokens and max context window length
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | Grok 4 | Advantage Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| Preference Elo | +36 | ||
| Coding Elo | — | — | |
| LiveBench | +3.3% | ||
| SWE-bench | +11.5% | ||
| GPQA Diamond | +1.2% | ||
| Time to first token | +10 ms | ||
| Output speed | 88 tok/s | 98 tok/s | +10 tok/s |
| Input price | — | ||
| Output price | — | ||
| Context window | +56k |
Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).
Higher SWE-bench (70.1%).
Lower output list price ($15/1M).
Lower TTFT (230 ms).
Larger window (256k).
Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (Claude Sonnet 4.5).
| Target Workload | Recommended Pick | Evaluation Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Repo / coding agents | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | Higher SWE-bench (70.1%). |
| High-volume chat | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | Lower output list price ($15/1M). |
| Voice / low-latency UI | Grok 4 | Lower TTFT (230 ms). |
| Long-document RAG | Grok 4 | Larger window (256k). |
| Screenshots / vision | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (Claude Sonnet 4.5). |
Most of Opus 4.5 coding at a mid-tier price. Sonnet 5 replaced it as the buy; 4.5 remains a compare baseline.
2025-07 row. 4.6 is the buy. We keep 4 so upgrade pairs and old inbound links resolve.
No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!
Dynamic OpenGraph banner generated at /compare/claude-sonnet-4-5-vs-grok-4/opengraph-image
Verified Head-to-Head Telemetry
