CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
Leaderboard
Models
Compare
Best of & Stacks
Research & News
…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

Theme:
Currency:
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Grok 4 remains the previous xAI flagship on this catalog
Grok 4 remains the previous xAI flagship on this catalog
launchVerified Dispatch
CompareLLM Intelligence Desk·Jul 10, 2025

Grok 4 remains the previous xAI flagship on this catalog

2025-07 row. 4.6 is the buy. We keep 4 so upgrade pairs and old inbound links resolve.

Search intent: grok 4 vs grok 4.6

Evaluated Models (2):
Grok 4xAI
Grok 4.6xAI
Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramXLinkedInReddit
Verified Benchmark Scorecard2 Models Evaluated

Grok 4 vs Grok 4.6: Live Benchmark Matchup

Live benchmark scores, throughput speeds, and token pricing with dynamic peer comparison.

Full Head-to-Head
LMSYS Arena Elo1,488Grok 4
SWE-bench Verified58.6%Coding resolve %
Throughput Speed98 tok/sGeneration rate
Output Price / 1M$15.00List API rate

60% Output Token Cost Advantage

Grok 4.6 costs $6.00 / 1M tokens compared to Grok 4 at $15.00 / 1M tokens ($9.00/1M tokens difference).

Interactive Model Comparison:2 models selected
Grok 4ArticleGrok 4.6Article
LMSYS Arena EloOverall human preference
quality
Grok 4
1,488
Grok 4.6Top
1,592
Coding EloProgramming preference
quality
Grok 4
—
Grok 4.6Top
1,568
SWE-bench VerifiedGitHub issue resolve %
quality
Grok 4
58.6%
Grok 4.6Top
69.1%
GPQA DiamondPhD-level science reasoning %
quality
Grok 4
79%
Grok 4.6Top
84.6%
LiveBenchContamination-free reasoning
quality
Grok 4
64.1%
Grok 4.6Top
71.4%
Throughput (Speed)Output tokens / second
speed
Grok 4
98 tok/s
Grok 4.6Top
118 tok/s
Time-to-First-TokenInitial latency (ms)
speed
Grok 4
230 ms
Grok 4.6Top
195 ms
Output Token Price$ per 1M reply tokens
price
Grok 4
$15/1M
Grok 4.6Top
$6/1M
Input Token Price$ per 1M prompt tokens
price
Grok 4
$3/1M
Grok 4.6Top
$2/1M
Context WindowMax token capacity
capacity
Grok 4
256k
Grok 4.6Top
500k
Benchmark / Metric
Grok 4xAI · Article Model
Grok 4.6xAI · Article Model
LMSYS Arena EloOverall human preference
1,488
1,592Top
Coding EloProgramming preference
—
1,568Top
SWE-bench VerifiedGitHub issue resolve %
58.6%
69.1%Top
GPQA DiamondPhD-level science reasoning %
79%
84.6%Top
LiveBenchContamination-free reasoning
64.1%
71.4%Top
Throughput (Speed)Output tokens / second
98 tok/s
118 tok/sTop
Time-to-First-TokenInitial latency (ms)
230 ms
195 msTop
Output Token Price$ per 1M reply tokens
$15/1M
$6/1MTop
Input Token Price$ per 1M prompt tokens
$3/1M
$2/1MTop
Context WindowMax token capacity
256k
500kTop
Executive Key Takeaway
2025-07 row. 4.6 is the buy. We keep 4 so upgrade pairs and old inbound links resolve.

Grok 4 is the previous xAI flagship. Grok 4.6 is the Aug 2026 refresh. Keeping both is how “grok 4 vs 4.6” stays a page instead of a 404. If you are still billed on 4, open the pair and check whether Elo and SWE-bench moved enough to justify the cutover. Same $ family is not guaranteed — read the price cells.

Two Grok slugs, one brand hub

The brand hub uses the highest-Elo xAI row. That should be 4.6 after the refresh. If ingest fails, the hub could briefly point at 4 — that is a data bug, not a ranking strategy.

Empirical Evaluation & Architectural Analysis

Standardized telemetry recorded in the verified CompareLLM Leaderboards captures distinct architectural priorities between Grok 4 and Grok 4.6. While blind human pairwise preference testing reflects instruction compliance and reasoning depth, domain-specific suites such as SWE-bench Verified and GPQA Diamond highlight coding execution and advanced STEM reasoning. For the live pairwise breakdown with historical trendlines, reference the interactive scorecard above or visit the Grok 4 vs Grok 4.6 Showdown.

We do not rank “funnier”

Humor is a product feature. It is not a metric key. If that is your constraint, this leaderboard is the wrong tool.

Strategic Deployment Recommendation

  • Production Workloads: For enterprise workloads requiring strict reliability, cross-reference Top Coding LLMs and Cheapest High-Quality LLMs.
  • Direct Pair Comparison: Explore the live pairwise breakdown at /compare/grok-4-6-vs-grok-4.
  • Architectural Stacks: Recommended architectural configurations can be evaluated on the CompareLLM Stack Engine.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is this an CompareLLM lab test score? No. Linked model dossiers and compare showdowns reflect dated snapshots gathered from named public evaluation benchmarks. Seed catalog entries remain transparently timestamped until daily ingest updates them.

Where can I see live comparisons for this model? View the showdown at /compare/grok-4-6-vs-grok-4.

What primary search query does this briefing answer? grok 4 vs grok 4.6.

Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramXLinkedInReddit

Head-to-Head Showdowns for Mentioned Models

Featured Article ShowdownGrok 4 vs Grok 4.6
Compare Benchmarks
Benchmark MatchupGrok 4 vs Claude Opus 4.5
Benchmark MatchupGrok 4 vs Claude Opus 4.6
Benchmark MatchupGrok 4.6 vs Claude Opus 4.5
Benchmark MatchupGrok 4.6 vs Claude Opus 4.6

Related news

  • compare · Aug 12, 2026

    Grok vs ChatGPT: price and Elo, not a personality contest

  • launch · Aug 12, 2026

    Grok 4.6 (Aug 12): post-training refresh, same $2/$6 list

Back to All DispatchesExplore Comparison Matrix