CompareLLM.ai
Live
Leaderboard
Models
Compare
Best of & Stacks
Research & News
…
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

Theme:
Currency:
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Claude Sonnet 4.5 is the previous workhorse — still a valid vs baseline
Claude Sonnet 4.5 is the previous workhorse — still a valid vs baseline
launchVerified Dispatch
CompareLLM Intelligence Desk·Feb 18, 2026

Claude Sonnet 4.5 is the previous workhorse — still a valid vs baseline

Most of Opus 4.5 coding at a mid-tier price. Sonnet 5 replaced it as the buy; 4.5 remains a compare baseline.

Search intent: claude sonnet 4.5 vs sonnet 5

Evaluated Models (5):
Claude Sonnet 4.5Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 5Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 4Anthropic
Claude 3.7 SonnetAnthropic
Claude 3.5 SonnetAnthropic
Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramXLinkedInReddit
Verified Benchmark Scorecard5 Models Evaluated

Claude Sonnet 4.5 & Frontier Peer Benchmark Comparison

Live benchmark scores, throughput speeds, and token pricing with dynamic peer comparison.

LMSYS Arena Elo1,524Claude Sonnet 4.5
SWE-bench Verified70.1%Coding resolve %
Throughput Speed88 tok/sGeneration rate
Output Price / 1M$15.00List rate
Interactive Model Comparison:5 models selected
Claude Sonnet 4.5ArticleClaude Sonnet 5ArticleClaude Sonnet 4ArticleClaude 3.7 SonnetArticleClaude 3.5 SonnetArticle
LMSYS Arena EloOverall human preference
quality
Claude Sonnet 4.5
1,524
Claude Sonnet 5Best
1,556
Claude Sonnet 4
1,455
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
1,362
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
1,280
Coding EloProgramming preference
quality
Claude Sonnet 4.5
1,531
Claude Sonnet 5Best
1,562
Claude Sonnet 4
1,468
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
—
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
—
SWE-bench VerifiedGitHub issue resolve %
quality
Claude Sonnet 4.5
70.1%
Claude Sonnet 5Best
73.8%
Claude Sonnet 4
62.8%
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
70.3%
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
49%
GPQA DiamondPhD-level science reasoning %
quality
Claude Sonnet 4.5
80.2%
Claude Sonnet 5Best
82.8%
Claude Sonnet 4
76.4%
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
78.5%
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
65%
LiveBenchContamination-free reasoning
quality
Claude Sonnet 4.5
67.4%
Claude Sonnet 5Best
70.4%
Claude Sonnet 4
63.2%
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
58.4%
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
52.1%
Throughput (Speed)Output tokens / second
speed
Claude Sonnet 4.5
88 tok/s
Claude Sonnet 5Best
118 tok/s
Claude Sonnet 4
92 tok/s
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
85 tok/s
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
80 tok/s
Time-to-First-TokenInitial latency (ms)
speed
Claude Sonnet 4.5
240 ms
Claude Sonnet 5Best
175 ms
Claude Sonnet 4
220 ms
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
240 ms
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
280 ms
Output Token Price$ per 1M reply tokens
price
Claude Sonnet 4.5
$15/1M
Claude Sonnet 5Best
$10/1M
Claude Sonnet 4
$15/1M
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
$15/1M
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
$15/1M
Input Token Price$ per 1M prompt tokens
price
Claude Sonnet 4.5
$3/1M
Claude Sonnet 5Best
$2/1M
Claude Sonnet 4
$3/1M
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
$3/1M
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
$3/1M
Context WindowMax token capacity
capacity
Claude Sonnet 4.5
200k
Claude Sonnet 5Best
1M
Claude Sonnet 4
200k
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
200k
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
200k
Benchmark / Metric
Claude Sonnet 4.5Anthropic · Article Model
Claude Sonnet 5Anthropic · Article Model
Claude Sonnet 4Anthropic · Article Model
Claude 3.7 SonnetAnthropic · Article Model
Claude 3.5 SonnetAnthropic · Article Model
LMSYS Arena EloOverall human preference
1,524
1,556Top
1,455
1,362
1,280
Coding EloProgramming preference
1,531
1,562Top
1,468
—
—
SWE-bench VerifiedGitHub issue resolve %
70.1%
73.8%Top
62.8%
70.3%
49%
GPQA DiamondPhD-level science reasoning %
80.2%
82.8%Top
76.4%
78.5%
65%
LiveBenchContamination-free reasoning
67.4%
70.4%Top
63.2%
58.4%
52.1%
Throughput (Speed)Output tokens / second
88 tok/s
118 tok/sTop
92 tok/s
85 tok/s
80 tok/s
Time-to-First-TokenInitial latency (ms)
240 ms
175 msTop
220 ms
240 ms
280 ms
Output Token Price$ per 1M reply tokens
$15/1M
$10/1MTop
$15/1M
$15/1M
$15/1M
Input Token Price$ per 1M prompt tokens
$3/1M
$2/1MTop
$3/1M
$3/1M
$3/1M
Context WindowMax token capacity
200k
1MTop
200k
200k
200k
Executive Key Takeaway
Most of Opus 4.5 coding at a mid-tier price. Sonnet 5 replaced it as the buy; 4.5 remains a compare baseline.

Sonnet 4.5 was the 2026-Q1 Anthropic workhorse: mid-tier price, most of Opus 4.5 coding. Sonnet 5 is the current buy. We keep 4.5 indexable so upgrade queries resolve. If your prompts still name 4.5, open the pair against Sonnet 5 and check SWE-bench plus output $/1M before you cut over.

Workhorse is a job, not a trophy

A workhorse wins on volume. If 5 is faster and cheaper and close on coding, migrate. If 4.5 still matches your eval and you have reserved capacity, there is no prize for the newer slug.

Empirical Evaluation & Architectural Analysis

Standardized telemetry recorded in the verified CompareLLM Leaderboards captures distinct architectural priorities between Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Claude Sonnet 5. While blind human pairwise preference testing reflects instruction compliance and reasoning depth, domain-specific suites such as SWE-bench Verified and GPQA Diamond highlight coding execution and advanced STEM reasoning. For the live pairwise breakdown with historical trendlines, reference the interactive scorecard above or visit the Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Claude Sonnet 5 Showdown.

Alias hygiene

“sonnet-4.5” and “claude sonnet 4.5” already map here. New marketplace ids should attach as aliases, not as preview clones.

Strategic Deployment Recommendation

  • Production Workloads: For enterprise workloads requiring strict reliability, cross-reference Top Coding LLMs and Cheapest High-Quality LLMs.
  • Direct Pair Comparison: Explore the live pairwise breakdown at /compare/claude-sonnet-4-5-vs-claude-sonnet-5.
  • Architectural Stacks: Recommended architectural configurations can be evaluated on the CompareLLM Stack Engine.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is this an CompareLLM lab test score? No. Linked model dossiers and compare showdowns reflect dated snapshots gathered from named public evaluation benchmarks. Seed catalog entries remain transparently timestamped until daily ingest updates them.

Where can I see live comparisons for this model? View the showdown at /compare/claude-sonnet-4-5-vs-claude-sonnet-5.

What primary search query does this briefing answer? claude sonnet 4.5 vs sonnet 5.

Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramXLinkedInReddit

Head-to-Head Showdowns for Mentioned Models

Featured Article ShowdownClaude Sonnet 4.5 vs Claude Sonnet 5
Compare Benchmarks
Benchmark MatchupClaude Sonnet 4.5 vs GPT-5
Benchmark MatchupClaude Sonnet 4.5 vs GPT-5 mini
Benchmark MatchupClaude Sonnet 5 vs GPT-5
Benchmark MatchupClaude Sonnet 5 vs GPT-5 mini
Benchmark MatchupClaude Sonnet 4 vs GPT-5
Benchmark MatchupClaude Sonnet 4 vs GPT-5 mini
Benchmark MatchupClaude 3.7 Sonnet vs GPT-5
Benchmark MatchupClaude 3.7 Sonnet vs GPT-5 mini
Benchmark MatchupClaude 3.5 Sonnet vs GPT-5
Benchmark MatchupClaude 3.5 Sonnet vs GPT-5 mini

Related news

  • compare · Aug 10, 2026

    Sonnet vs Opus in 2026: same family, different invoice

  • price · Aug 10, 2026

    Claude Sonnet 5 at $2/$10: the 2026 Anthropic workhorse

  • news · Feb 25, 2025

    Claude 3.7 Sonnet stays as a historical hybrid-reasoning baseline

Back to All DispatchesExplore Comparison Matrix