CompareLLM.ai
Live
Leaderboard
Models
Compare
Best of & Stacks
Research & News
…
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

Theme:
Currency:
  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs GPT-4 Turbo

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 1, 2026

Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs GPT-4 Turbo benchmark

In this head-to-head showdown, Claude Sonnet 4.5 delivers higher overall intelligence and human-preferred responses (Elo 1,524 vs 1,255), while Claude Sonnet 4.5 leads in SWE-bench software engineering benchmarks (70.1%), while Claude Sonnet 4.5 is more budget-friendly at $15/1M per 1M output tokens. Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.

Executive Comparison Verdict

Bottom Line: Claude Sonnet 4.5 holds the advantage over GPT-4 Turbo in overall benchmark performance and human evaluation rankings. Choose Claude Sonnet 4.5 for demanding workloads, or review the breakdown below to compare coding and pricing metrics.
Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramXLinkedInReddit

Verified Head-to-Head Advantage Breakdown

9 direct benchmark disciplines evaluated across capability, speed, and cost

Claude Sonnet 4.5 (9)GPT-4 Turbo (0)
Claude Sonnet 4.5
9 of 9 Wins
✓Preference Elo✓LiveBench✓SWE-bench✓GPQA Diamond✓Time to first token✓Output speed✓Input price✓Output price✓Context window
GPT-4 Turbo
0 of 9 Wins
Competitive baseline across remaining benchmarks
Anthropic
Leads 9 of 9 metrics
Claude Sonnet 4.5

Workhorse Anthropic model: most of Opus coding quality at a mid-tier price.

Sonnet 4.5Elo 1,524$15/1M out
OpenAI
GPT-4 Turbo

GPT-4 Turbo 128k. Historical flagship for gpt-4 turbo vs gpt-4o / gpt-5.

Elo 1,255$30/1M out

Claude 4 Series Lineage & Sibling Variants

5 models

Currently comparing Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs GPT-4 Turbo. Alternative family tiers available.

Active: Claude Sonnet 4.5
Claude Opus 4.5$75Claude Opus 4.6$75Claude Opus 4.8$25Claude Haiku 4.5$5
Top Rival Showdowns for Claude Sonnet 4.5
All Matchups
Compare vs:vs GPT-5vs Gemini 3 Provs Grok 4.6vs DeepSeek V4 Provs Qwen 3 Max
Preference LeaderClaude Sonnet 4.5 Wins

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Δ 269 Arena Elo pts

Throughput LeaderClaude Sonnet 4.5 Wins

Claude Sonnet 4.5

88 tok/s

Value per Dollar LeaderClaude Sonnet 4.5 Wins

Claude Sonnet 4.5

$15 / 1M output

Capability Percentiles

Relative percentile scores computed across all active models in the benchmark catalog.

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Leaders Matchup Capability Radar

Comparing top Western standard models with China's leading frontier rival across 6 skill dimensions. Tap any spoke or dot to inspect.

Tap any node to inspect
Percentile 0–100
Head-to-Head Comparison

Overall Matchup Breakdown

Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.

Claude Sonnet 4.5 (10)vsGPT-4 Turbo (0)
Claude Sonnet 4.5: 10W (100%)Overall: Claude Sonnet 4.5GPT-4 Turbo: 0W (0%)
← Claude Sonnet 4.5GPT-4 Turbo →
🏆Claude Sonnet 4.5(5/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Benchmark
Claude Sonnet 4.5vsGPT-4 Turbo
Preference Elo
1,524vs1,255+269
Coding Elo
1,531vs—
SWE-bench
70.1%vs33.2%+36.9%
LiveBench
67.4%vs47%+20.4%
GPQA Diamond
80.2%vs48%+32.2%
Claude Sonnet 4.5: 5WGPT-4 Turbo: 0W
🏆Claude Sonnet 4.5(2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Benchmark
Claude Sonnet 4.5vsGPT-4 Turbo
Output speed
88 tok/svs55 tok/s+33 tok/s
Time to first token
240 msvs350 ms+110 ms
Claude Sonnet 4.5: 2WGPT-4 Turbo: 0W
🏆Claude Sonnet 4.5(3/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Benchmark
Claude Sonnet 4.5vsGPT-4 Turbo
Output price
$15/1Mvs$30/1M+$15/1M
Input price
$3/1Mvs$10/1M+$7/1M
Context window
200kvs128k+72k
Claude Sonnet 4.5: 3WGPT-4 Turbo: 0W

Side-by-Side Benchmark Matrix

Preference Elo+269
Claude Sonnet 4.51,524
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
GPT-4 Turbo1,255
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Coding Elo
Claude Sonnet 4.51,531
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
GPT-4 Turbo—
LiveBench+20.4%
Claude Sonnet 4.567.4%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
GPT-4 Turbo47%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
SWE-bench+36.9%
Claude Sonnet 4.570.1%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
GPT-4 Turbo33.2%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
GPQA Diamond+32.2%
Claude Sonnet 4.580.2%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
GPT-4 Turbo48%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Time to first token+110 ms
Claude Sonnet 4.5240 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
GPT-4 Turbo350 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Output speed+33 tok/s
Claude Sonnet 4.588 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
GPT-4 Turbo55 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Input price+$7/1M
Claude Sonnet 4.5$3/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
GPT-4 Turbo$10/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Output price+$15/1M
Claude Sonnet 4.5$15/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
GPT-4 Turbo$30/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Context window+72k
Claude Sonnet 4.5200k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
GPT-4 Turbo128k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5GPT-4 TurboAdvantage Delta
Preference Elo
1,524
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
1,255
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+269
Coding Elo
1,531
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
——
LiveBench
67.4%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
47%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+20.4%
SWE-bench
70.1%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
33.2%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+36.9%
GPQA Diamond
80.2%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
48%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+32.2%
Time to first token
240 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
350 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+110 ms
Output speed
88 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
55 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+33 tok/s
Input price
$3/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
$10/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+$7/1M
Output price
$15/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
$30/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+$15/1M
Context window
200k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
128k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+72k
Interactive Simulator (USD)

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).

Save up to 59% with Claude Sonnet 4.5
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
Claude Sonnet 4.5$330.00 / mo
In: $105Out: $225
GPT-4 Turbo$800.00 / mo
In: $350Out: $450
Estimated Cost Delta

Claude Sonnet 4.5 is estimated to save $470.00/month ($5,640/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    Claude Sonnet 4.5:Pick Claude Sonnet 4.5 when repo-level coding accuracy is the constraint.
  • 2
    Claude Sonnet 4.5:Pick Claude Sonnet 4.5 when time-to-first-token matters more than peak Elo.
  • 3
    Claude Sonnet 4.5:Pick Claude Sonnet 4.5 as the default general assistant.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsClaude Sonnet 4.5

Higher SWE-bench (70.1%).

High-volume chatClaude Sonnet 4.5

Lower output list price ($15/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIClaude Sonnet 4.5

Lower TTFT (240 ms).

Long-document RAGClaude Sonnet 4.5

Larger window (200k).

Screenshots / visionClaude Sonnet 4.5

Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (Claude Sonnet 4.5).

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsClaude Sonnet 4.5Higher SWE-bench (70.1%).
High-volume chatClaude Sonnet 4.5Lower output list price ($15/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIClaude Sonnet 4.5Lower TTFT (240 ms).
Long-document RAGClaude Sonnet 4.5Larger window (200k).
Screenshots / visionClaude Sonnet 4.5Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (Claude Sonnet 4.5).

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

View all news
launchFeb 18, 2026

Claude Sonnet 4.5 is the previous workhorse — still a valid vs baseline

Most of Opus 4.5 coding at a mid-tier price. Sonnet 5 replaced it as the buy; 4.5 remains a compare baseline.

Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Social Share Card Preview

Dynamic OpenGraph banner generated at /compare/claude-sonnet-4-5-vs-gpt-4-turbo/opengraph-image

Save PNG

CompareLLM AI Matrix

Verified Head-to-Head Telemetry

LIVE BENCHMARK
VS
Anthropic

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Elo 1,524
SWE-bench70.1%
Speed (tok/s)88 tok/s
Input / 1M Tokens$3/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$15/1M
OpenAI

GPT-4 Turbo

Elo 1,255
SWE-bench33.2%
Speed (tok/s)55 tok/s
Input / 1M Tokens$10/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$30/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or GPT-4 Turbo?
Claude Sonnet 4.5 has the higher preference Elo in our latest snapshot (1,524). “Better” still depends on coding, price, and latency — see the table.
Which is better at coding, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or GPT-4 Turbo?
Claude Sonnet 4.5 leads SWE-bench at 70.1% vs 33.2%. SWE-bench is one harness, not your repo.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
Claude Sonnet 4.5 output tokens are $15/1M versus $30/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or GPT-4 Turbo?
Claude Sonnet 4.5 has the lower time-to-first-token (240 ms vs 350 ms). Tokens/sec is a separate column if you care about long completions.
Which has the larger context window?
Claude Sonnet 4.5 accepts 200k tokens versus 128k.
Can I self-host either model?
Neither model is marked open-weights here. You are comparing hosted APIs.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Claude Sonnet 4.5 and GPT-4 Turbo Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Related news

  • launch · Feb 18, 2026

    Claude Sonnet 4.5 is the previous workhorse — still a valid vs baseline

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All Claude Sonnet 4.5 matchups →|All GPT-4 Turbo matchups →
Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Claude Sonnet 4 (previous sonnet)Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Claude Sonnet 5 (next sonnet)GPT-4 Turbo vs GPT-4o (next gpt-flagship)GPT-4.5 Orion vs Claude Sonnet 4.5GPT-5.6 Terra vs Claude Sonnet 4.5GPT-5 vs Claude Sonnet 4.5