CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
Leaderboard
Models
Compare
Best of & Stacks
Research & News
…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

Theme:
Currency:
  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs GPT-5.6 Terra

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 17, 2026

Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs GPT-5.6 Terra benchmark

In this head-to-head showdown, GPT-5.6 Terra delivers higher overall intelligence and human-preferred responses (Elo 1,548 vs 1,524), while GPT-5.6 Terra leads in SWE-bench software engineering benchmarks (70.4%), while GPT-5.6 Terra is more budget-friendly at $6/1M per 1M output tokens. Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.

Executive Comparison Verdict

Bottom Line: GPT-5.6 Terra holds the advantage over Claude Sonnet 4.5 in overall benchmark performance and human evaluation rankings. Choose GPT-5.6 Terra for demanding workloads, or review the breakdown below to compare coding and pricing metrics.
Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramXLinkedInReddit

Verified Head-to-Head Advantage Breakdown

10 direct benchmark disciplines evaluated across capability, speed, and cost

Claude Sonnet 4.5 (0)GPT-5.6 Terra (10)
Claude Sonnet 4.5
0 of 10 Wins
Competitive baseline across remaining benchmarks
GPT-5.6 Terra
10 of 10 Wins
✓Preference Elo✓Coding Elo✓LiveBench✓SWE-bench✓GPQA Diamond✓Time to first token✓Output speed✓Input price✓Output price✓Context window
Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 4.5

Workhorse Anthropic model: most of Opus coding quality at a mid-tier price.

Sonnet 4.5Elo 1,524$15/1M out
OpenAI
Leads 10 of 10 metrics
GPT-5.6 Terra

OpenAI 5.6 mid tier. Official API $2/$12 per 1M after the Jul 30 2026 price cut.

Terra Mid-TierElo 1,548$6/1M out

Claude 4 Series Lineage & Sibling Variants

5 models

Currently comparing Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs GPT-5.6 Terra. Alternative family tiers available.

Active: Claude Sonnet 4.5
Claude Opus 4.5$25Claude Opus 4.6$25Claude Opus 4.8$25Claude Haiku 4.5$5
Top Rival Showdowns for Claude Sonnet 4.5
All Matchups
Compare vs:vs GPT-5vs Gemini 3 Provs Grok 4.6vs DeepSeek V4 Provs Qwen 3 Max
Preference LeaderGPT-5.6 Terra Wins

GPT-5.6 Terra

Δ 24 Arena Elo pts

Throughput LeaderGPT-5.6 Terra Wins

GPT-5.6 Terra

128 tok/s

Value per Dollar LeaderGPT-5.6 Terra Wins

GPT-5.6 Terra

$6 / 1M output

Capability Percentiles

Relative percentile scores computed across all active models in the benchmark catalog.

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Leaders Matchup Capability Radar

Comparing top Western standard models with China's leading frontier rival across 6 skill dimensions. Tap any spoke or dot to inspect.

Tap any node to inspect
Percentile 0–100
Head-to-Head Comparison

Overall Matchup Breakdown

Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.

Claude Sonnet 4.5 (0)vsGPT-5.6 Terra (10)
Claude Sonnet 4.5: 0W (0%)Overall: GPT-5.6 TerraGPT-5.6 Terra: 10W (100%)
← Claude Sonnet 4.5GPT-5.6 Terra →
🏆GPT-5.6 Terra(5/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Benchmark
Claude Sonnet 4.5vsGPT-5.6 Terra
Preference Elo
1,524vs1,548+24
Coding Elo
1,531vs1,542+11
SWE-bench
70.1%vs70.4%+0.3%
LiveBench
67.4%vs69.1%+1.7%
GPQA Diamond
80.2%vs82%+1.8%
Claude Sonnet 4.5: 0WGPT-5.6 Terra: 5W
🏆GPT-5.6 Terra(2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Benchmark
Claude Sonnet 4.5vsGPT-5.6 Terra
Output speed
88 tok/svs128 tok/s+40 tok/s
Time to first token
240 msvs160 ms+80 ms
Claude Sonnet 4.5: 0WGPT-5.6 Terra: 2W
🏆GPT-5.6 Terra(3/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Benchmark
Claude Sonnet 4.5vsGPT-5.6 Terra
Output price
$15/1Mvs$6/1M+$9/1M
Input price
$3/1Mvs$1/1M+$2/1M
Context window
1Mvs1.1M+50k
Claude Sonnet 4.5: 0WGPT-5.6 Terra: 3W

Side-by-Side Benchmark Matrix

Preference Elo+24
Claude Sonnet 4.51,524
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
GPT-5.6 Terra1,548
lmarena · Aug 16, 2026
Coding Elo+11
Claude Sonnet 4.51,531
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
GPT-5.6 Terra1,542
lmarena · Aug 16, 2026
LiveBench+1.7%
Claude Sonnet 4.567.4%
livebench · Aug 17, 2026
GPT-5.6 Terra69.1%
livebench · Aug 16, 2026
SWE-bench+0.3%
Claude Sonnet 4.570.1%
swebench · Aug 17, 2026
GPT-5.6 Terra70.4%
swebench · Aug 16, 2026
GPQA Diamond+1.8%
Claude Sonnet 4.580.2%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
GPT-5.6 Terra82%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
Time to first token+80 ms
Claude Sonnet 4.5240 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
GPT-5.6 Terra160 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
Output speed+40 tok/s
Claude Sonnet 4.588 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
GPT-5.6 Terra128 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
Input price+$2/1M
Claude Sonnet 4.5$3/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
GPT-5.6 Terra$1/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
Output price+$9/1M
Claude Sonnet 4.5$15/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
GPT-5.6 Terra$6/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
Context window+50k
Claude Sonnet 4.51M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
GPT-5.6 Terra1.1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5GPT-5.6 TerraAdvantage Delta
Preference Elo
1,524
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
1,548
lmarena · Aug 16, 2026
+24
Coding Elo
1,531
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
1,542
lmarena · Aug 16, 2026
+11
LiveBench
67.4%
livebench · Aug 17, 2026
69.1%
livebench · Aug 16, 2026
+1.7%
SWE-bench
70.1%
swebench · Aug 17, 2026
70.4%
swebench · Aug 16, 2026
+0.3%
GPQA Diamond
80.2%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
82%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
+1.8%
Time to first token
240 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
160 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
+80 ms
Output speed
88 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
128 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
+40 tok/s
Input price
$3/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
$1/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
+$2/1M
Output price
$15/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
$6/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
+$9/1M
Context window
1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
1.1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
+50k
Interactive Simulator (USD)

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).

Save up to 62% with GPT-5.6 Terra
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
Claude Sonnet 4.5$330.00 / mo
In: $105Out: $225
GPT-5.6 Terra$125.00 / mo
In: $35Out: $90
Estimated Cost Delta

GPT-5.6 Terra is estimated to save $205.00/month ($2,460/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    GPT-5.6 Terra:Pick GPT-5.6 Terra when repo-level coding accuracy is the constraint.
  • 2
    GPT-5.6 Terra:Pick GPT-5.6 Terra when time-to-first-token matters more than peak Elo.
  • 3
    GPT-5.6 Terra:Pick GPT-5.6 Terra for million-token RAG or long-document jobs.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsGPT-5.6 Terra

Higher SWE-bench (70.4%).

High-volume chatGPT-5.6 Terra

Lower output list price ($6/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIGPT-5.6 Terra

Lower TTFT (160 ms).

Long-document RAGGPT-5.6 Terra

Larger window (1.1M).

Screenshots / visionGPT-5.6 Terra

Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (GPT-5.6 Terra).

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsGPT-5.6 TerraHigher SWE-bench (70.4%).
High-volume chatGPT-5.6 TerraLower output list price ($6/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIGPT-5.6 TerraLower TTFT (160 ms).
Long-document RAGGPT-5.6 TerraLarger window (1.1M).
Screenshots / visionGPT-5.6 TerraBoth accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (GPT-5.6 Terra).

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

View all news
priceJul 30, 2026

GPT-5.6 Terra after the Jul 30 cut: $2/$12 mid-tier

Terra is OpenAI’s Sonnet-class invoice. Use it when Sol is too expensive and Luna is too small.

launchFeb 18, 2026

Claude Sonnet 4.5 is the previous workhorse — still a valid vs baseline

Most of Opus 4.5 coding at a mid-tier price. Sonnet 5 replaced it as the buy; 4.5 remains a compare baseline.

Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Social Share Card Preview

Dynamic OpenGraph banner generated at /compare/claude-sonnet-4-5-vs-gpt-5-6-terra/opengraph-image

Save PNG

CompareLLM AI Matrix

Verified Head-to-Head Telemetry

LIVE BENCHMARK
VS
Anthropic

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Elo 1,524
SWE-bench70.1%
Speed (tok/s)88 tok/s
Input / 1M Tokens$3/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$15/1M
OpenAI

GPT-5.6 Terra

Elo 1,548
SWE-bench70.4%
Speed (tok/s)128 tok/s
Input / 1M Tokens$1/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$6/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or GPT-5.6 Terra?
GPT-5.6 Terra has the higher preference Elo in our latest snapshot (1,548). “Better” still depends on coding, price, and latency — see the table.
Which is better at coding, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or GPT-5.6 Terra?
GPT-5.6 Terra leads SWE-bench at 70.4% vs 70.1%. SWE-bench is one harness, not your repo.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
GPT-5.6 Terra output tokens are $6/1M versus $15/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or GPT-5.6 Terra?
GPT-5.6 Terra has the lower time-to-first-token (160 ms vs 240 ms). Tokens/sec is a separate column if you care about long completions.
Which has the larger context window?
GPT-5.6 Terra accepts 1.1M tokens versus 1M.
Can I self-host either model?
Neither model is marked open-weights here. You are comparing hosted APIs.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Claude Sonnet 4.5 and GPT-5.6 Terra Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Related news

  • price · Jul 30, 2026

    GPT-5.6 Terra after the Jul 30 cut: $2/$12 mid-tier

  • launch · Feb 18, 2026

    Claude Sonnet 4.5 is the previous workhorse — still a valid vs baseline

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All Claude Sonnet 4.5 matchups →|All GPT-5.6 Terra matchups →
Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Claude Sonnet 4 (previous sonnet)Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Claude Sonnet 5 (next sonnet)GPT-4.5 Orion vs GPT-5.6 TerraClaude Sonnet 5 vs GPT-5.6 TerraGPT-5 vs GPT-5.6 TerraClaude Opus 4.5 vs GPT-5.6 Terra