CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
Explore
Compare
Decide
Track
Learn
…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

Theme:
Currency:
  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. Claude Opus 4 vs Yi-Large

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 17, 2026

Claude Opus 4 vs Yi-Large benchmark

In this head-to-head showdown, Claude Opus 4 delivers higher overall intelligence and human-preferred responses (Elo 1,490 vs 1,430), while Claude Opus 4 leads in SWE-bench software engineering benchmarks (72.5%), while Yi-Large is more budget-friendly at $0.3/1M per 1M output tokens. Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.

Executive Comparison Verdict

Bottom Line: Choose Claude Opus 4 if your priority is peak reasoning, complex code generation, and top preference Elo. Choose Yi-Large if you are optimizing for low latency, high throughput, and cost-efficient API deployment.
Share Analysis:Share:
WhatsAppTelegramXLinkedIn
Executive Verdict Summary

Claude Opus 4 holds empirical advantage (6 of 10 metrics)

Coding / SWESWE-bench
Claude Opus 4Top code solve rate
ReasoningGPQA / Live
Claude Opus 4Top logical accuracy
Best Value$/1M Tok
Yi-LargeLowest API billing cost
Speed / TokTok/Sec
Yi-LargeFastest stream rate

Verified Advantage Breakdown

10 benchmarks evaluated across capability, speed, and cost

Claude Opus 4 (6)Yi-Large (4)
Claude Opus 4
6 of 10 Wins
✓Preference Elo✓Coding Elo✓LiveBench✓SWE-bench✓GPQA Diamond✓Context window
Yi-Large
4 of 10 Wins
✓Time to first token✓Output speed✓Input price✓Output price
Anthropic
Leads 6 of 10
Claude Opus 4

First Claude 4 Opus generation. Baseline for opus 4 vs opus 5.

Elo 1,490In: $15 · Out: $75/1M
01.AI
Leads 4 of 10
Yi-Large

01.AI full-scale dense model for complex instruction following.

Elo 1,430In: $0.3 · Out: $0.3/1M
Top Rival Showdowns for Claude Opus 4
All Matchups
Compare vs:vs GPT-5vs Gemini 3 Provs Grok 4.6vs DeepSeek V4 Provs Qwen 3 Max
Preference LeaderClaude Opus 4 Wins

Claude Opus 4

Δ 60 Arena Elo pts

Throughput LeaderYi-Large Wins

Yi-Large

90 tok/s

Value per Dollar LeaderYi-Large Wins

Yi-Large

$0.3 / 1M output

Capability Percentiles

Relative percentile scores computed across all active models in the benchmark catalog.

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Leaders Matchup Capability Radar

Comparing top standard models across 6 key capability dimensions. Tap any spoke or dot to inspect.

Tap any node to inspect
0–100 %ile

Overall Matchup Breakdown

Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.

Claude Opus 4 (6)vsYi-Large (4)
Claude Opus 4: 6W (60%)Overall: Claude Opus 4Yi-Large: 4W (40%)
← Claude Opus 4Yi-Large →
🏆Claude Opus 4 Leads(5/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Benchmark
Claude Opus 4vsYi-Large
Preference Elo
1,490vs1,430+60
Coding Elo
1,502vs1,410+92
SWE-bench
72.5%vs53.8%+18.7%
LiveBench
66.8%vs60.5%+6.3%
GPQA Diamond
80.4%vs72.4%+8%
Claude Opus 4: 5WYi-Large: 0W
🏆Yi-Large Leads(2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Benchmark
Claude Opus 4vsYi-Large
Output speed
58 tok/svs90 tok/s+32 tok/s
Time to first token
390 msvs220 ms+170 ms
Claude Opus 4: 0WYi-Large: 2W
🏆Yi-Large Leads(2/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Benchmark
Claude Opus 4vsYi-Large
Output price
$75/1Mvs$0.3/1M+$74.7/1M
Input price
$15/1Mvs$0.3/1M+$14.7/1M
Context window
200kvs33k+167k
Claude Opus 4: 1WYi-Large: 2W

Side-by-Side Benchmark Matrix

Claude Opus 4Yi-Large
Preference EloClaude Opus 4 +60
Claude Opus 41,490
Yi-Large1,430
Coding EloClaude Opus 4 +92
Claude Opus 41,502
Yi-Large1,410
LiveBenchClaude Opus 4 +6.3%
Claude Opus 466.8%
Yi-Large60.5%
SWE-benchClaude Opus 4 +18.7%
Claude Opus 472.5%
Yi-Large53.8%
GPQA DiamondClaude Opus 4 +8%
Claude Opus 480.4%
Yi-Large72.4%
Time to first tokenYi-Large +170 ms
Claude Opus 4390 ms
Yi-Large220 ms
Output speedYi-Large +32 tok/s
Claude Opus 458 tok/s
Yi-Large90 tok/s
Input priceYi-Large +$14.7/1M
Claude Opus 4$15/1M
Yi-Large$0.3/1M
Output priceYi-Large +$74.7/1M
Claude Opus 4$75/1M
Yi-Large$0.3/1M
Context windowClaude Opus 4 +167k
Claude Opus 4200k
Yi-Large33k
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4Yi-LargeAdvantage Delta
Preference Elo
1,490
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
1,430
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
+60
Coding Elo
1,502
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
1,410
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
+92
LiveBench
66.8%
livebench · Aug 17, 2026
60.5%
livebench · Aug 17, 2026
+6.3%
SWE-bench
72.5%
swebench · Aug 17, 2026
53.8%
swebench · Aug 17, 2026
+18.7%
GPQA Diamond
80.4%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
72.4%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+8%
Time to first token
390 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
220 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+170 ms
Output speed
58 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
90 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+32 tok/s
Input price
$15/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
$0.3/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+$14.7/1M
Output price
$75/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
$0.3/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+$74.7/1M
Context window
200k
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
33k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+167k

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).

Save 99% with Yi-Large
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
Claude Opus 4$1,650.00 / mo
In: $525Out: $1,125
Yi-Large$15.00 / mo
In: $10.5Out: $4.5
Estimated Cost Delta

Yi-Large is estimated to save $1,635.00/month ($19,620/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    Claude Opus 4:Pick Claude Opus 4 when repo-level coding accuracy is the constraint.
  • 2
    Yi-Large:Pick Yi-Large when you are optimizing output cost.
  • 3
    Yi-Large:Pick Yi-Large when time-to-first-token matters more than peak Elo.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsClaude Opus 4

Higher SWE-bench (72.5%).

High-volume chatYi-Large

Lower output list price ($0.3/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIYi-Large

Lower TTFT (220 ms).

Long-document RAGClaude Opus 4

Larger window (200k).

Screenshots / visionClaude Opus 4

Claude Opus 4 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsClaude Opus 4Higher SWE-bench (72.5%).
High-volume chatYi-LargeLower output list price ($0.3/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIYi-LargeLower TTFT (220 ms).
Long-document RAGClaude Opus 4Larger window (200k).
Screenshots / visionClaude Opus 4Claude Opus 4 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Social Share Card Preview

Dynamic OpenGraph banner generated at /compare/claude-opus-4-vs-yi-large/opengraph-image

Save PNG

CompareLLM AI Matrix

Verified Head-to-Head Telemetry

LIVE BENCHMARK
VS
Anthropic

Claude Opus 4

Elo 1,490
SWE-bench72.5%
Speed (tok/s)58 tok/s
Input / 1M Tokens$15/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$75/1M
01.AI

Yi-Large

Elo 1,430
SWE-bench53.8%
Speed (tok/s)90 tok/s
Input / 1M Tokens$0.3/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$0.3/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Claude Opus 4 or Yi-Large?
Claude Opus 4 has the higher preference Elo in our latest snapshot (1,490). “Better” still depends on coding, price, and latency — see the table.
Which is better at coding, Claude Opus 4 or Yi-Large?
Claude Opus 4 leads SWE-bench at 72.5% vs 53.8%. SWE-bench is one harness, not your repo.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
Yi-Large output tokens are $0.3/1M versus $75/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, Claude Opus 4 or Yi-Large?
Yi-Large has the lower time-to-first-token (220 ms vs 390 ms). Tokens/sec is a separate column if you care about long completions.
Which has the larger context window?
Claude Opus 4 accepts 200k tokens versus 33k.
Can I self-host either model?
Neither model is marked open-weights here. You are comparing hosted APIs.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Claude Opus 4 and Yi-Large Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All Claude Opus 4 matchups →|All Yi-Large matchups →
Claude Opus 4 vs Claude 3 Opus (previous opus)Claude Opus 4 vs Claude Opus 4.5 (next opus)Yi-Large vs Yi-Lightning (next other)Yi-Lightning vs Claude Opus 4Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Claude Opus 4Claude Sonnet 5 vs Claude Opus 4