CompareLLM.ai
Live
Leaderboard
Models
Compare
Best of & Stacks
Research & News
…
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

Theme:
Currency:
  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Grok 4

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 1, 2026

Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Grok 4 benchmark

In this head-to-head showdown, Grok 4 delivers higher overall intelligence and human-preferred responses (Elo 1,488 vs 1,280), while Grok 4 leads in SWE-bench software engineering benchmarks (58.6%), while Claude 3.5 Sonnet is more budget-friendly at $15/1M per 1M output tokens, while Grok 4 provides faster response streaming (98 tok/s). Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.

Executive Comparison Verdict

Bottom Line: Choose Grok 4 if your priority is peak reasoning, complex code generation, and top preference Elo. Choose Claude 3.5 Sonnet if you are optimizing for low latency, high throughput, and cost-efficient API deployment.
Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramXLinkedInReddit

Verified Head-to-Head Advantage Breakdown

7 direct benchmark disciplines evaluated across capability, speed, and cost

Claude 3.5 Sonnet (0)Grok 4 (7)
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
0 of 7 Wins
Competitive baseline across remaining benchmarks
Grok 4
7 of 7 Wins
✓Preference Elo✓LiveBench✓SWE-bench✓GPQA Diamond✓Time to first token✓Output speed✓Context window
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Sonnet

2024 workhorse. Still a high-intent compare against GPT-4o.

Elo 1,280$15/1M out
xAI
Leads 7 of 7 metrics
Grok 4

Previous xAI flagship.

Grok 4.0Elo 1,488$15/1M out
Top Rival Showdowns for Claude 3.5 Sonnet
All Matchups
Compare vs:vs GPT-5vs Gemini 3 Provs Grok 4.6vs DeepSeek V4 Provs Qwen 3 Max
Preference LeaderGrok 4 Wins

Grok 4

Δ 208 Arena Elo pts

Throughput LeaderGrok 4 Wins

Grok 4

98 tok/s

Value per Dollar LeaderClaude 3.5 Sonnet Wins

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

$15 / 1M output

Capability Percentiles

Relative percentile scores computed across all active models in the benchmark catalog.

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Leaders Matchup Capability Radar

Comparing top Western standard models with China's leading frontier rival across 6 skill dimensions. Tap any spoke or dot to inspect.

Tap any node to inspect
Percentile 0–100
Head-to-Head Comparison

Overall Matchup Breakdown

Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet (0)vsGrok 4 (7)
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 0W (0%)Overall: Grok 4Grok 4: 7W (100%)
← Claude 3.5 Sonnet2 tiesGrok 4 →
🏆Grok 4(4/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Benchmark
Claude 3.5 SonnetvsGrok 4
Preference Elo
1,280vs1,488+208
Coding Elo
—vs—
SWE-bench
49%vs58.6%+9.6%
LiveBench
52.1%vs64.1%+12%
GPQA Diamond
65%vs79%+14%
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 0WGrok 4: 4W
🏆Grok 4(2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Benchmark
Claude 3.5 SonnetvsGrok 4
Output speed
80 tok/svs98 tok/s+18 tok/s
Time to first token
280 msvs230 ms+50 ms
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 0WGrok 4: 2W
🏆Grok 4(1/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Benchmark
Claude 3.5 SonnetvsGrok 4
Output price
$15/1Mvs$15/1M
Input price
$3/1Mvs$3/1M
Context window
200kvs256k+56k
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 0WGrok 4: 1W

Side-by-Side Benchmark Matrix

Preference Elo+208
Claude 3.5 Sonnet1,280
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Grok 41,488
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
LiveBench+12%
Claude 3.5 Sonnet52.1%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Grok 464.1%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
SWE-bench+9.6%
Claude 3.5 Sonnet49%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Grok 458.6%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
GPQA Diamond+14%
Claude 3.5 Sonnet65%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Grok 479%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Time to first token+50 ms
Claude 3.5 Sonnet280 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Grok 4230 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Output speed+18 tok/s
Claude 3.5 Sonnet80 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Grok 498 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Input price
Claude 3.5 Sonnet$3/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Grok 4$3/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Output price
Claude 3.5 Sonnet$15/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Grok 4$15/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Context window+56k
Claude 3.5 Sonnet200k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Grok 4256k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
BenchmarkClaude 3.5 SonnetGrok 4Advantage Delta
Preference Elo
1,280
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
1,488
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+208
LiveBench
52.1%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
64.1%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+12%
SWE-bench
49%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
58.6%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+9.6%
GPQA Diamond
65%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
79%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+14%
Time to first token
280 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
230 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+50 ms
Output speed
80 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
98 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+18 tok/s
Input price
$3/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
$3/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
—
Output price
$15/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
$15/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
—
Context window
200k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
256k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+56k
Interactive Simulator (USD)

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).

Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
Claude 3.5 Sonnet$330.00 / mo
In: $105Out: $225
Grok 4$330.00 / mo
In: $105Out: $225

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    Grok 4:Pick Grok 4 when repo-level coding accuracy is the constraint.
  • 2
    Claude 3.5 Sonnet:Pick Claude 3.5 Sonnet when you are optimizing output cost.
  • 3
    Grok 4:Pick Grok 4 when time-to-first-token matters more than peak Elo.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsGrok 4

Higher SWE-bench (58.6%).

High-volume chatClaude 3.5 Sonnet

Lower output list price ($15/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIGrok 4

Lower TTFT (230 ms).

Long-document RAGGrok 4

Larger window (256k).

Screenshots / visionGrok 4

Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (Grok 4).

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsGrok 4Higher SWE-bench (58.6%).
High-volume chatClaude 3.5 SonnetLower output list price ($15/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIGrok 4Lower TTFT (230 ms).
Long-document RAGGrok 4Larger window (256k).
Screenshots / visionGrok 4Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (Grok 4).

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

View all news
launchJul 10, 2025

Grok 4 remains the previous xAI flagship on this catalog

2025-07 row. 4.6 is the buy. We keep 4 so upgrade pairs and old inbound links resolve.

Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Social Share Card Preview

Dynamic OpenGraph banner generated at /compare/claude-3-5-sonnet-vs-grok-4/opengraph-image

Save PNG

CompareLLM AI Matrix

Verified Head-to-Head Telemetry

LIVE BENCHMARK
VS
Anthropic

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Elo 1,280
SWE-bench49%
Speed (tok/s)80 tok/s
Input / 1M Tokens$3/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$15/1M
xAI

Grok 4

Elo 1,488
SWE-bench58.6%
Speed (tok/s)98 tok/s
Input / 1M Tokens$3/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$15/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Claude 3.5 Sonnet or Grok 4?
Grok 4 has the higher preference Elo in our latest snapshot (1,488). “Better” still depends on coding, price, and latency — see the table.
Which is better at coding, Claude 3.5 Sonnet or Grok 4?
Grok 4 leads SWE-bench at 58.6% vs 49%. SWE-bench is one harness, not your repo.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
Claude 3.5 Sonnet output tokens are $15/1M versus $15/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, Claude 3.5 Sonnet or Grok 4?
Grok 4 has the lower time-to-first-token (230 ms vs 280 ms). Tokens/sec is a separate column if you care about long completions.
Which has the larger context window?
Grok 4 accepts 256k tokens versus 200k.
Can I self-host either model?
Neither model is marked open-weights here. You are comparing hosted APIs.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Grok 4 Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Related news

  • launch · Jul 10, 2025

    Grok 4 remains the previous xAI flagship on this catalog

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All Claude 3.5 Sonnet matchups →|All Grok 4 matchups →
Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Claude 3.7 Sonnet (next sonnet)Grok 4 vs Grok 3 (previous grok)Grok 4 vs Grok 4.6 (next grok)Claude Opus 4.5 vs Grok 4Claude Opus 4.6 vs Grok 4Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Grok 4