Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 1, 2026

Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro vs Wan2.6 Text to Image benchmark

Name: Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro vs Wan2.6 Text to Image AI benchmark comparison
Creator: CompareLLM
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Comparing verified benchmark accuracy, speed, and token pricing between Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro and Wan2.6 Text to Image. Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.

Share Analysis:Share:

WhatsApp Telegram X LinkedIn

Executive Verdict Summary

Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro holds empirical advantage (3 of 5 metrics)

Coding / SWESWE-bench

Recraft V4.1 Utility ProTop code solve rate

ReasoningGPQA / Live

Recraft V4.1 Utility ProTop logical accuracy

Best Value$/1M Tok

Recraft V4.1 Utility ProLowest API billing cost

Speed / TokTok/Sec

Recraft V4.1 Utility ProFastest stream rate

Verified Advantage Breakdown

5 benchmarks evaluated across capability, speed, and cost

Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro (3)Wan2.6 Text to Image (2)

Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro

3 of 5 Wins

✓Image Elo✓Prompt adherence✓Text rendering

Wan2.6 Text to Image

2 of 5 Wins

✓Generation time✓Price per 1k images

Recraft

Leads 3 of 5

Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro

Specialized generative model for vector art, icon sets, illustrations, and commercial design assets with native brand color matching.

Img Elo 1,218$210/1k imgs

Alibaba

Leads 2 of 5

Wan2.6 Text to Image

Alibaba high-efficiency open video/image unified transformer backbone.

Img Elo 1,215$30/1k imgs

Top Rival Showdowns for Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro

All Matchups

Compare vs:vs GPT Image 2 (High)vs Reve 2.1 vs Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image)vs FLUX.2 [max]vs Ideogram 4.0 (Quality)

Image Quality LeaderRecraft V4.1 Utility Pro Wins

Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro

Δ 3 Image Elo pts

Generation Speed LeaderWan2.6 Text to Image Wins

Wan2.6 Text to Image

3.1s per render

Value per Dollar LeaderWan2.6 Text to Image Wins

Wan2.6 Text to Image

$30/1k images

Overall Matchup Breakdown

Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.

Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro (3)vsWan2.6 Text to Image (2)

Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro: 3W (60%)Wan2.6 Text to Image: 2W (40%)

← Recraft V4.1 Utility ProWan2.6 Text to Image →

🏆Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro Leads(3/3)

Visual Quality & Adherence

Arena Preference Elo, prompt fidelity & typography score

Benchmark

Recraft V4.1 Utility ProvsWan2.6 Text to Image

Image Elo

1,218vs1,215+3

Prompt adherence

91%vs89.5%+1.5%

Text rendering

94%vs87%+7%

Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro: 3WWan2.6 Text to Image: 0W

🏆Wan2.6 Text to Image Leads(1/1)

Generation Latency

Time to render full-resolution image snapshot (seconds)

Benchmark

Recraft V4.1 Utility ProvsWan2.6 Text to Image

Generation time

4.6svs3.1s+1.5s

Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro: 0WWan2.6 Text to Image: 1W

🏆Wan2.6 Text to Image Leads(1/1)

Cost Efficiency

API inference cost per 1,000 generated images

Benchmark

Recraft V4.1 Utility ProvsWan2.6 Text to Image

Price per 1k images

$210/1kvs$30/1k+$180/1k

Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro: 0WWan2.6 Text to Image: 1W

Side-by-Side Benchmark Matrix

Recraft V4.1 Utility ProWan2.6 Text to Image

Image EloRecraft V4.1 Utility Pro +3

Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro1,218

Wan2.6 Text to Image1,215

Generation timeWan2.6 Text to Image +1.5s

Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro4.6s

Wan2.6 Text to Image3.1s

Price per 1k imagesWan2.6 Text to Image +$180/1k

Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro$210/1k

Wan2.6 Text to Image$30/1k

Prompt adherenceRecraft V4.1 Utility Pro +1.5%

Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro91%

Wan2.6 Text to Image89.5%

Text renderingRecraft V4.1 Utility Pro +7%

Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro94%

Wan2.6 Text to Image87%

Benchmark	Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro	Wan2.6 Text to Image	Advantage Delta
Image Elo	1,218 seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026	1,215 seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026	+3
Generation time	4.6s seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026	3.1s seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026	+1.5s
Price per 1k images	$210/1k seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026	$30/1k seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026	+$180/1k
Prompt adherence	91% seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026	89.5% seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026	+1.5%
Text rendering	94% seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026	87% seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026	+7%

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).

Save 86% with Wan2.6 Text to Image

Monthly Image Production Volume25k images / month (25000 imgs)

Quick Presets:

Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro$5,250.00 / mo

Rate: $210/1k

Wan2.6 Text to Image$750.00 / mo

Rate: $30/1k

Estimated Cost Delta

Wan2.6 Text to Image is estimated to save $4,500.00/month ($54,000/year).

Based on 25k images generated

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsinsufficient data

Need SWE-bench on both sides.

High-volume chatinsufficient data

Need list prices.

Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient data

Need TTFT on both sides.

Long-document RAGinsufficient data

Need context sizes.

Screenshots / visioninsufficient data

Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (undefined).

Target Workload	Recommended Pick	Evaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agents	insufficient data	Need SWE-bench on both sides.
High-volume chat	insufficient data	Need list prices.
Voice / low-latency UI	insufficient data	Need TTFT on both sides.
Long-document RAG	insufficient data	Need context sizes.
Screenshots / vision	insufficient data	Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (undefined).

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Social Share Card Preview

Dynamic OpenGraph banner generated at /compare/recraft-v4-1-pro-vs-wan-2-6-t2i/opengraph-image

Save PNG

CompareLLM AI Matrix

Verified Head-to-Head Telemetry

LIVE BENCHMARK

Recraft

Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro

Elo n/a

SWE-bench—

Speed (tok/s)—

Input / 1M Tokens$210/1k

Output / 1M Tokens$210/1k

Alibaba

Wan2.6 Text to Image

Elo n/a

SWE-bench—

Speed (tok/s)—

Input / 1M Tokens$30/1k

Output / 1M Tokens$30/1k

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro or Wan2.6 Text to Image?: We do not have preference Elo for both models, so we do not declare an overall winner. Compare the metrics that exist.
Which is better at coding, Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro or Wan2.6 Text to Image?: SWE-bench is missing for at least one model, so we do not rank coding from a single number.
Which is cheaper to run in production?: List prices are missing for at least one model.
Which is faster, Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro or Wan2.6 Text to Image?: We do not have TTFT for both models.
Which has the larger context window?: Context window is missing for at least one model.
Can I self-host either model?: Wan2.6 Text to Image is marked open-weights in our catalog. The other side is a closed API. Check the provider license before you ship weights.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?: No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?: Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro and Wan2.6 Text to Image Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro matchups →|All Wan2.6 Text to Image matchups →

Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro vs Recraft V4.1 Utility (previous recraft)Qwen Image 2.0 Pro vs Wan2.6 Text to Image Recraft V4.1 Utility vs Wan2.6 Text to Image GPT Image 2 (High) vs Wan2.6 Text to Image Reve 2.1 vs Wan2.6 Text to Image Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image) vs Wan2.6 Text to Image

Side-by-Side Benchmark Matrix

Recraft V4.1 Utility ProWan2.6 Text to Image

Image EloRecraft V4.1 Utility Pro +3

Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro1,218

Wan2.6 Text to Image1,215

Generation timeWan2.6 Text to Image +1.5s

Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro4.6s

Wan2.6 Text to Image3.1s

Price per 1k imagesWan2.6 Text to Image +$180/1k

Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro$210/1k

Wan2.6 Text to Image$30/1k

Prompt adherenceRecraft V4.1 Utility Pro +1.5%

Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro91%

Wan2.6 Text to Image89.5%

Text renderingRecraft V4.1 Utility Pro +7%

Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro94%

Wan2.6 Text to Image87%

Benchmark

Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro

Wan2.6 Text to Image

Advantage Delta

Image Elo

1,218

seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026

1,215

seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026

Generation time

4.6s

seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026

3.1s

seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026

+1.5s

Price per 1k images

$210/1k

seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026

$30/1k

seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026

+$180/1k

Prompt adherence

91%

seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026

89.5%

seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026

+1.5%

Text rendering

94%

seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026

87%

seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026

+7%

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsinsufficient data

Need SWE-bench on both sides.

High-volume chatinsufficient data

Need list prices.

Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient data

Need TTFT on both sides.

Long-document RAGinsufficient data

Need context sizes.

Screenshots / visioninsufficient data

Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (undefined).

Target Workload	Recommended Pick	Evaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agents	insufficient data	Need SWE-bench on both sides.
High-volume chat	insufficient data	Need list prices.
Voice / low-latency UI	insufficient data	Need TTFT on both sides.
Long-document RAG	insufficient data	Need context sizes.
Screenshots / vision	insufficient data	Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (undefined).

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro or Wan2.6 Text to Image?

We do not have preference Elo for both models, so we do not declare an overall winner. Compare the metrics that exist.

Which is better at coding, Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro or Wan2.6 Text to Image?

SWE-bench is missing for at least one model, so we do not rank coding from a single number.

Which is cheaper to run in production?

List prices are missing for at least one model.

Which is faster, Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro or Wan2.6 Text to Image?

We do not have TTFT for both models.

Which has the larger context window?

Context window is missing for at least one model.

Can I self-host either model?

Wan2.6 Text to Image is marked open-weights in our catalog. The other side is a closed API. Check the provider license before you ship weights.

Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?

No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.

What does preference Elo mean on this page?

Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro and Wan2.6 Text to Image Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.