Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 17, 2026noindex (thin pair)

Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B vs Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash benchmark

Name: Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B vs Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash AI benchmark comparison
Creator: CompareLLM
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

In this head-to-head showdown, Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash is more budget-friendly at $0.13/1M per 1M output tokens. Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.

Share Analysis:Share:

WhatsApp Telegram X LinkedIn

Executive Verdict Summary

Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash holds empirical advantage (3 of 3 metrics)

Coding / SWESWE-bench

Qwen 2.5 Coder 32BTop code solve rate

ReasoningGPQA / Live

Qwen 2.5 Coder 32BTop logical accuracy

Best Value$/1M Tok

Qwen: Qwen3.7 FlashLowest API billing cost

Speed / TokTok/Sec

Qwen 2.5 Coder 32BFastest stream rate

Verified Advantage Breakdown

3 benchmarks evaluated across capability, speed, and cost

Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B (0)Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash (3)

Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B

0 of 3 Wins

Competitive baseline across remaining benchmarks

Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash

3 of 3 Wins

✓Input price✓Output price✓Context window

Alibaba

Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B

Alibaba dedicated open-weight code generation model with near-frontier SWE-bench Verified coding capability.

Elo 1,425In: $0.18 · Out: $0.72/1M

Alibaba

Leads 3 of 3

Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash

Auto-discovered from OpenRouter (qwen/qwen3.7-flash). Preview until a second source matches.

In: $0.03 · Out: $0.13/1M

Top Rival Showdowns for Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B

All Matchups

Compare vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5 vs GPT-5 vs Gemini 3 Pro vs Grok 4.6 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro

Preference Leader

No shared data

Single model data

Throughput Leader

No shared data

No latency data

Value per Dollar LeaderQwen: Qwen3.7 Flash Wins

Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash

$0.13 / 1M output

Capability Percentiles

Relative percentile scores computed across all active models in the benchmark catalog.

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Leaders Matchup Capability Radar

Comparing top standard models across 6 key capability dimensions. Tap any spoke or dot to inspect.

Tap any node to inspect

0–100 %ile

Overall Matchup Breakdown

Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.

Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B (7)vsQwen: Qwen3.7 Flash (3)

Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B: 7W (70%)Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash: 3W (30%)

← Qwen 2.5 Coder 32BQwen: Qwen3.7 Flash →

🏆Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B Leads(5/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Benchmark

Qwen 2.5 Coder 32BvsQwen: Qwen3.7 Flash

Preference Elo

1,425vs—

Coding Elo

1,495vs—

SWE-bench

65.2%vs—

LiveBench

64.8%vs—

GPQA Diamond

74%vs—

Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B: 5WQwen: Qwen3.7 Flash: 0W

🏆Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B Leads(2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Benchmark

Qwen 2.5 Coder 32BvsQwen: Qwen3.7 Flash

Output speed

110 tok/svs—

Time to first token

180 msvs—

Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B: 2WQwen: Qwen3.7 Flash: 0W

🏆Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash Leads(3/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Benchmark

Qwen 2.5 Coder 32BvsQwen: Qwen3.7 Flash

Output price

$0.72/1Mvs$0.13/1M+$0.59/1M

Input price

$0.18/1Mvs$0.03/1M+$0.15/1M

Context window

131kvs1M+869k

Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B: 0WQwen: Qwen3.7 Flash: 3W

Side-by-Side Benchmark Matrix

Qwen 2.5 Coder 32BQwen: Qwen3.7 Flash

Preference Elo

Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B1,425

Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash—

Coding Elo

Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B1,495

Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash—

LiveBench

Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B64.8%

Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash—

SWE-bench

Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B65.2%

Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash—

GPQA Diamond

Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B74%

Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash—

Time to first token

Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B180 ms

Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash—

Output speed

Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B110 tok/s

Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash—

Input priceQwen: Qwen3.7 Flash +$0.15/1M

Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B$0.18/1M

Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash$0.03/1M

Output priceQwen: Qwen3.7 Flash +$0.59/1M

Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B$0.72/1M

Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash$0.13/1M

Context windowQwen: Qwen3.7 Flash +869k

Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B131k

Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash1M

Benchmark	Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B	Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash	Advantage Delta
Preference Elo	1,425 seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026	—	—
Coding Elo	1,495 seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026	—	—
LiveBench	64.8% seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026	—	—
SWE-bench	65.2% seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026	—	—
GPQA Diamond	74% seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026	—	—
Time to first token	180 ms seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026	—	—
Output speed	110 tok/s seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026	—	—
Input price	$0.18/1M seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026	$0.03/1M openrouter · Aug 17, 2026	+$0.15/1M
Output price	$0.72/1M seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026	$0.13/1M openrouter · Aug 17, 2026	+$0.59/1M
Context window	131k seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026	1M openrouter · Aug 17, 2026	+869k

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).

Save 82% with Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash

Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo

Quick Presets:

Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out

RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)

Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B$17.10 / mo

In: $6.3Out: $10.8

Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash$3.00 / mo

In: $1.05Out: $1.95

Estimated Cost Delta

Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash is estimated to save $14.10/month ($169/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

1
Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash:Pick Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash when you are optimizing output cost.
2
Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash:Pick Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash for million-token RAG or long-document jobs.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsinsufficient data

Need SWE-bench on both sides.

High-volume chatQwen: Qwen3.7 Flash

Lower output list price ($0.13/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient data

Need TTFT on both sides.

Long-document RAGQwen: Qwen3.7 Flash

Larger window (1M).

Screenshots / visionQwen: Qwen3.7 Flash

Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target Workload	Recommended Pick	Evaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agents	insufficient data	Need SWE-bench on both sides.
High-volume chat	Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash	Lower output list price ($0.13/1M).
Voice / low-latency UI	insufficient data	Need TTFT on both sides.
Long-document RAG	Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash	Larger window (1M).
Screenshots / vision	Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash	Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Social Share Card Preview

Dynamic OpenGraph banner generated at /compare/qwen-2-5-coder-32b-vs-qwen3-7-flash/opengraph-image

Save PNG

CompareLLM AI Matrix

Verified Head-to-Head Telemetry

LIVE BENCHMARK

Alibaba

Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B

Elo 1,425

SWE-bench65.2%

Speed (tok/s)110 tok/s

Input / 1M Tokens$0.18/1M

Output / 1M Tokens$0.72/1M

Alibaba

Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash

Elo n/a

SWE-bench—

Speed (tok/s)1M

Input / 1M Tokens$0.03/1M

Output / 1M Tokens$0.13/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B or Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash?: We do not have preference Elo for both models, so we do not declare an overall winner. Compare the metrics that exist.
Which is better at coding, Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B or Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash?: SWE-bench is missing for at least one model, so we do not rank coding from a single number.
Which is cheaper to run in production?: Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash output tokens are $0.13/1M versus $0.72/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B or Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash?: We do not have TTFT for both models.
Which has the larger context window?: Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash accepts 1M tokens versus 131k.
Can I self-host either model?: Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B is marked open-weights in our catalog. The other side is a closed API. Check the provider license before you ship weights.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?: No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?: Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B and Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B matchups →|All Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash matchups →

Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B vs Qwen 2.5 Plus (previous qwen)Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B vs Qwen3 235B (next qwen)Qwen QwQ 32B vs Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B Qwen 3 Max vs Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B Qwen3.8 27B vs Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B

Capability Percentiles

Relative percentile scores computed across all active models in the benchmark catalog.

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Leaders Matchup Capability Radar

Comparing top standard models across 6 key capability dimensions. Tap any spoke or dot to inspect.

Tap any node to inspect

0–100 %ile

Side-by-Side Benchmark Matrix

Qwen 2.5 Coder 32BQwen: Qwen3.7 Flash

Preference Elo

Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B1,425

Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash—

Coding Elo

Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B1,495

Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash—

LiveBench

Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B64.8%

Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash—

SWE-bench

Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B65.2%

Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash—

GPQA Diamond

Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B74%

Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash—

Time to first token

Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B180 ms

Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash—

Output speed

Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B110 tok/s

Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash—

Input priceQwen: Qwen3.7 Flash +$0.15/1M

Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B$0.18/1M

Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash$0.03/1M

Output priceQwen: Qwen3.7 Flash +$0.59/1M

Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B$0.72/1M

Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash$0.13/1M

Context windowQwen: Qwen3.7 Flash +869k

Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B131k

Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash1M

Benchmark

Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B

Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash

Advantage Delta

Preference Elo

1,425

seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026

—

Coding Elo

1,495

seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026

—

LiveBench

64.8%

seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026

—

SWE-bench

65.2%

seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026

—

GPQA Diamond

74%

seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026

—

Time to first token

180 ms

seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026

—

Output speed

110 tok/s

seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026

—

Input price

$0.18/1M

seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026

$0.03/1M

openrouter · Aug 17, 2026

+$0.15/1M

Output price

$0.72/1M

seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026

$0.13/1M

openrouter · Aug 17, 2026

+$0.59/1M

Context window

131k

seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026

openrouter · Aug 17, 2026

+869k

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsinsufficient data

Need SWE-bench on both sides.

High-volume chatQwen: Qwen3.7 Flash

Lower output list price ($0.13/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient data

Need TTFT on both sides.

Long-document RAGQwen: Qwen3.7 Flash

Larger window (1M).

Screenshots / visionQwen: Qwen3.7 Flash

Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target Workload	Recommended Pick	Evaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agents	insufficient data	Need SWE-bench on both sides.
High-volume chat	Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash	Lower output list price ($0.13/1M).
Voice / low-latency UI	insufficient data	Need TTFT on both sides.
Long-document RAG	Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash	Larger window (1M).
Screenshots / vision	Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash	Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B or Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash?

We do not have preference Elo for both models, so we do not declare an overall winner. Compare the metrics that exist.

Which is better at coding, Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B or Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash?

SWE-bench is missing for at least one model, so we do not rank coding from a single number.

Which is cheaper to run in production?

Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash output tokens are $0.13/1M versus $0.72/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.

Which is faster, Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B or Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash?

We do not have TTFT for both models.

Which has the larger context window?

Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash accepts 1M tokens versus 131k.

Can I self-host either model?

Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B is marked open-weights in our catalog. The other side is a closed API. Check the provider license before you ship weights.

Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?

No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.

What does preference Elo mean on this page?

Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B and Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.