Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 17, 2026noindex (thin pair)

Meta: Muse Glimmer 30B vs Yi-Large benchmark

Name: Meta: Muse Glimmer 30B vs Yi-Large AI benchmark comparison
Creator: CompareLLM
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

In this head-to-head showdown, Yi-Large is more budget-friendly at $0.3/1M per 1M output tokens. Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.

Share Analysis:Share:

WhatsApp Telegram X LinkedIn

Executive Verdict Summary

Yi-Large holds empirical advantage (2 of 3 metrics)

Coding / SWESWE-bench

Yi-LargeTop code solve rate

ReasoningGPQA / Live

Yi-LargeTop logical accuracy

Best Value$/1M Tok

Yi-LargeLowest API billing cost

Speed / TokTok/Sec

Yi-LargeFastest stream rate

Verified Advantage Breakdown

3 benchmarks evaluated across capability, speed, and cost

Meta: Muse Glimmer 30B (1)Yi-Large (2)

Meta: Muse Glimmer 30B

1 of 3 Wins

✓Context window

Yi-Large

2 of 3 Wins

✓Input price✓Output price

No shared data

Single model data

Throughput Leader

No shared data

No latency data

Value per Dollar LeaderYi-Large Wins

Yi-Large

$0.3 / 1M output

Capability Percentiles

Relative percentile scores computed across all active models in the benchmark catalog.

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Leaders Matchup Capability Radar

Comparing top standard models across 6 key capability dimensions. Tap any spoke or dot to inspect.

Tap any node to inspect

0–100 %ile

Overall Matchup Breakdown

Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.

Meta: Muse Glimmer 30B (1)vsYi-Large (9)

Meta: Muse Glimmer 30B: 1W (10%)Yi-Large: 9W (90%)

← Meta: Muse Glimmer 30BYi-Large →

🏆Yi-Large Leads(5/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Benchmark

Meta: Muse Glimmer 30BvsYi-Large

Preference Elo

—vs1,430

Coding Elo

—vs1,410

SWE-bench

—vs53.8%

LiveBench

—vs60.5%

GPQA Diamond

—vs72.4%

Meta: Muse Glimmer 30B: 0WYi-Large: 5W

🏆Yi-Large Leads(2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Benchmark

Meta: Muse Glimmer 30BvsYi-Large

Output speed

—vs90 tok/s

Time to first token

—vs220 ms

Meta: Muse Glimmer 30B: 0WYi-Large: 2W

🏆Yi-Large Leads(2/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Benchmark

Meta: Muse Glimmer 30BvsYi-Large

Output price

$1.5/1Mvs$0.3/1M+$1.2/1M

Input price

$0.35/1Mvs$0.3/1M+$0.05/1M

Context window

131kvs33k+98k

Meta: Muse Glimmer 30B: 1WYi-Large: 2W

Side-by-Side Benchmark Matrix

Meta: Muse Glimmer 30BYi-Large

Preference Elo

Meta: Muse Glimmer 30B—

Yi-Large1,430

Coding Elo

Meta: Muse Glimmer 30B—

Yi-Large1,410

LiveBench

Meta: Muse Glimmer 30B—

Yi-Large60.5%

SWE-bench

Meta: Muse Glimmer 30B—

Yi-Large53.8%

GPQA Diamond

Meta: Muse Glimmer 30B—

Yi-Large72.4%

Time to first token

Meta: Muse Glimmer 30B—

Yi-Large220 ms

Output speed

Meta: Muse Glimmer 30B—

Yi-Large90 tok/s

Input priceYi-Large +$0.05/1M

Meta: Muse Glimmer 30B$0.35/1M

Yi-Large$0.3/1M

Output priceYi-Large +$1.2/1M

Meta: Muse Glimmer 30B$1.5/1M

Yi-Large$0.3/1M

Context windowMeta: Muse Glimmer 30B +98k

Meta: Muse Glimmer 30B131k

Yi-Large33k

Benchmark	Meta: Muse Glimmer 30B	Yi-Large	Advantage Delta
Preference Elo	—	1,430 lmarena · Aug 17, 2026	—
Coding Elo	—	1,410 lmarena · Aug 17, 2026	—
LiveBench	—	60.5% livebench · Aug 17, 2026	—
SWE-bench	—	53.8% swebench · Aug 17, 2026	—
GPQA Diamond	—	72.4% seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026	—
Time to first token	—	220 ms seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026	—
Output speed	—	90 tok/s seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026	—
Input price	$0.35/1M openrouter · Aug 17, 2026	$0.3/1M seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026	+$0.05/1M
Output price	$1.5/1M openrouter · Aug 17, 2026	$0.3/1M seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026	+$1.2/1M
Context window	131k openrouter · Aug 17, 2026	33k seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026	+98k

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).

Save 57% with Yi-Large

Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo

Quick Presets:

Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out

RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)

Meta: Muse Glimmer 30B$34.75 / mo

In: $12.25Out: $22.5

Yi-Large$15.00 / mo

In: $10.5Out: $4.5

Estimated Cost Delta

Yi-Large is estimated to save $19.75/month ($237/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

1
Yi-Large:Pick Yi-Large when you are optimizing output cost.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsinsufficient data

Need SWE-bench on both sides.

High-volume chatYi-Large

Lower output list price ($0.3/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient data

Need TTFT on both sides.

Long-document RAGMeta: Muse Glimmer 30B

Larger window (131k).

Screenshots / visionYi-Large

Yi-Large is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target Workload	Recommended Pick	Evaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agents	insufficient data	Need SWE-bench on both sides.
High-volume chat	Yi-Large	Lower output list price ($0.3/1M).
Voice / low-latency UI	insufficient data	Need TTFT on both sides.
Long-document RAG	Meta: Muse Glimmer 30B	Larger window (131k).
Screenshots / vision	Yi-Large	Yi-Large is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Social Share Card Preview

Dynamic OpenGraph banner generated at /compare/muse-glimmer-30b-vs-yi-large/opengraph-image

Save PNG

CompareLLM AI Matrix

Verified Head-to-Head Telemetry

LIVE BENCHMARK

Meta: Muse Glimmer 30B

Elo n/a

SWE-bench—

Speed (tok/s)131k

Input / 1M Tokens$0.35/1M

Output / 1M Tokens$1.5/1M

01.AI

Yi-Large

Elo 1,430

SWE-bench53.8%

Speed (tok/s)90 tok/s

Input / 1M Tokens$0.3/1M

Output / 1M Tokens$0.3/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Meta: Muse Glimmer 30B or Yi-Large?: We do not have preference Elo for both models, so we do not declare an overall winner. Compare the metrics that exist.
Which is better at coding, Meta: Muse Glimmer 30B or Yi-Large?: SWE-bench is missing for at least one model, so we do not rank coding from a single number.
Which is cheaper to run in production?: Yi-Large output tokens are $0.3/1M versus $1.5/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, Meta: Muse Glimmer 30B or Yi-Large?: We do not have TTFT for both models.
Which has the larger context window?: Meta: Muse Glimmer 30B accepts 131k tokens versus 33k.
Can I self-host either model?: Neither model is marked open-weights here. You are comparing hosted APIs.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?: No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?: Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Meta: Muse Glimmer 30B and Yi-Large Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All Meta: Muse Glimmer 30B matchups →|All Yi-Large matchups →

Yi-Large vs Yi-Lightning (next other)Llama 4 Maverick vs Yi-Large Claude Opus 4.5 vs Yi-Large Claude Opus 4.6 vs Yi-Large Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Yi-Large GPT-5 vs Yi-Large

Capability Percentiles

Relative percentile scores computed across all active models in the benchmark catalog.

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Leaders Matchup Capability Radar

Comparing top standard models across 6 key capability dimensions. Tap any spoke or dot to inspect.

Tap any node to inspect

0–100 %ile

Side-by-Side Benchmark Matrix

Meta: Muse Glimmer 30BYi-Large

Preference Elo

Meta: Muse Glimmer 30B—

Yi-Large1,430

Coding Elo

Meta: Muse Glimmer 30B—

Yi-Large1,410

LiveBench

Meta: Muse Glimmer 30B—

Yi-Large60.5%

SWE-bench

Meta: Muse Glimmer 30B—

Yi-Large53.8%

GPQA Diamond

Meta: Muse Glimmer 30B—

Yi-Large72.4%

Time to first token

Meta: Muse Glimmer 30B—

Yi-Large220 ms

Output speed

Meta: Muse Glimmer 30B—

Yi-Large90 tok/s

Input priceYi-Large +$0.05/1M

Meta: Muse Glimmer 30B$0.35/1M

Yi-Large$0.3/1M

Output priceYi-Large +$1.2/1M

Meta: Muse Glimmer 30B$1.5/1M

Yi-Large$0.3/1M

Context windowMeta: Muse Glimmer 30B +98k

Meta: Muse Glimmer 30B131k

Yi-Large33k

Benchmark

Meta: Muse Glimmer 30B

Yi-Large

Advantage Delta

Preference Elo

—

1,430

lmarena · Aug 17, 2026

—

Coding Elo

—

1,410

lmarena · Aug 17, 2026

—

LiveBench

—

60.5%

livebench · Aug 17, 2026

—

SWE-bench

—

53.8%

swebench · Aug 17, 2026

—

GPQA Diamond

—

72.4%

seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026

—

Time to first token

—

220 ms

seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026

—

Output speed

—

90 tok/s

seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026

—

Input price

$0.35/1M

openrouter · Aug 17, 2026

$0.3/1M

seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026

+$0.05/1M

Output price

$1.5/1M

openrouter · Aug 17, 2026

$0.3/1M

seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026

+$1.2/1M

Context window

131k

openrouter · Aug 17, 2026

33k

seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026

+98k

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsinsufficient data

Need SWE-bench on both sides.

High-volume chatYi-Large

Lower output list price ($0.3/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient data

Need TTFT on both sides.

Long-document RAGMeta: Muse Glimmer 30B

Larger window (131k).

Screenshots / visionYi-Large

Yi-Large is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target Workload	Recommended Pick	Evaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agents	insufficient data	Need SWE-bench on both sides.
High-volume chat	Yi-Large	Lower output list price ($0.3/1M).
Voice / low-latency UI	insufficient data	Need TTFT on both sides.
Long-document RAG	Meta: Muse Glimmer 30B	Larger window (131k).
Screenshots / vision	Yi-Large	Yi-Large is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Meta: Muse Glimmer 30B or Yi-Large?

We do not have preference Elo for both models, so we do not declare an overall winner. Compare the metrics that exist.

Which is better at coding, Meta: Muse Glimmer 30B or Yi-Large?

SWE-bench is missing for at least one model, so we do not rank coding from a single number.

Which is cheaper to run in production?

Yi-Large output tokens are $0.3/1M versus $1.5/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.

Which is faster, Meta: Muse Glimmer 30B or Yi-Large?

We do not have TTFT for both models.

Which has the larger context window?

Meta: Muse Glimmer 30B accepts 131k tokens versus 33k.

Can I self-host either model?

Neither model is marked open-weights here. You are comparing hosted APIs.

Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?

No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.

What does preference Elo mean on this page?

Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Meta: Muse Glimmer 30B and Yi-Large Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.