CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
Explore
Compare
Decide
Track
Learn
…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

Theme:
Currency:
  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. MiniMax: MiniMax M2.1 vs Qwen 2.5 Plus

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 17, 2026noindex (thin pair)

MiniMax: MiniMax M2.1 vs Qwen 2.5 Plus benchmark

In this head-to-head showdown, Qwen 2.5 Plus is more budget-friendly at $1/1M per 1M output tokens. Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.

Executive Comparison Verdict

Bottom Line: Choose MiniMax: MiniMax M2.1 if your priority is peak reasoning, complex code generation, and top preference Elo. Choose Qwen 2.5 Plus if you are optimizing for low latency, high throughput, and cost-efficient API deployment.
Share Analysis:Share:
WhatsAppTelegramXLinkedIn
Executive Verdict Summary

Qwen 2.5 Plus holds empirical advantage (2 of 3 metrics)

Coding / SWESWE-bench
Qwen 2.5 PlusTop code solve rate
ReasoningGPQA / Live
Qwen 2.5 PlusTop logical accuracy
Best Value$/1M Tok
Qwen 2.5 PlusLowest API billing cost
Speed / TokTok/Sec
Qwen 2.5 PlusFastest stream rate

Verified Advantage Breakdown

3 benchmarks evaluated across capability, speed, and cost

MiniMax: MiniMax M2.1 (1)Qwen 2.5 Plus (2)
MiniMax: MiniMax M2.1
1 of 3 Wins
✓Context window
Qwen 2.5 Plus
2 of 3 Wins
✓Input price✓Output price
MiniMax
Leads 1 of 3
MiniMax: MiniMax M2.1

Auto-discovered from OpenRouter (minimax/minimax-m2.1). Preview until a second source matches.

In: $0.3 · Out: $1.2/1M
Alibaba
Leads 2 of 3
Qwen 2.5 Plus

Alibaba balanced flagship API model with high-throughput general reasoning.

Elo 1,445In: $0.25 · Out: $1/1M
Top Rival Showdowns for MiniMax: MiniMax M2.1
All Matchups
Compare vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5vs GPT-5vs Gemini 3 Provs Grok 4.6vs DeepSeek V4 Pro
Preference Leader

No shared data

Single model data

Throughput Leader

No shared data

No latency data

Value per Dollar LeaderQwen 2.5 Plus Wins

Qwen 2.5 Plus

$1 / 1M output

Capability Percentiles

Relative percentile scores computed across all active models in the benchmark catalog.

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Leaders Matchup Capability Radar

Comparing top standard models across 6 key capability dimensions. Tap any spoke or dot to inspect.

Tap any node to inspect
0–100 %ile

Overall Matchup Breakdown

Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.

MiniMax: MiniMax M2.1 (1)vsQwen 2.5 Plus (9)
MiniMax: MiniMax M2.1: 1W (10%)Overall: Qwen 2.5 PlusQwen 2.5 Plus: 9W (90%)
← MiniMax: MiniMax M2.1Qwen 2.5 Plus →
🏆Qwen 2.5 Plus Leads(5/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Benchmark
MiniMax: MiniMax M2.1vsQwen 2.5 Plus
Preference Elo
—vs1,445
Coding Elo
—vs1,460
SWE-bench
—vs59.2%
LiveBench
—vs63.5%
GPQA Diamond
—vs75.8%
MiniMax: MiniMax M2.1: 0WQwen 2.5 Plus: 5W
🏆Qwen 2.5 Plus Leads(2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Benchmark
MiniMax: MiniMax M2.1vsQwen 2.5 Plus
Output speed
—vs110 tok/s
Time to first token
—vs180 ms
MiniMax: MiniMax M2.1: 0WQwen 2.5 Plus: 2W
🏆Qwen 2.5 Plus Leads(2/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Benchmark
MiniMax: MiniMax M2.1vsQwen 2.5 Plus
Output price
$1.2/1Mvs$1/1M+$0.2/1M
Input price
$0.3/1Mvs$0.25/1M+$0.05/1M
Context window
205kvs128k+77k
MiniMax: MiniMax M2.1: 1WQwen 2.5 Plus: 2W

Side-by-Side Benchmark Matrix

MiniMax: MiniMax M2.1Qwen 2.5 Plus
Preference Elo
MiniMax: MiniMax M2.1—
Qwen 2.5 Plus1,445
Coding Elo
MiniMax: MiniMax M2.1—
Qwen 2.5 Plus1,460
LiveBench
MiniMax: MiniMax M2.1—
Qwen 2.5 Plus63.5%
SWE-bench
MiniMax: MiniMax M2.1—
Qwen 2.5 Plus59.2%
GPQA Diamond
MiniMax: MiniMax M2.1—
Qwen 2.5 Plus75.8%
Time to first token
MiniMax: MiniMax M2.1—
Qwen 2.5 Plus180 ms
Output speed
MiniMax: MiniMax M2.1—
Qwen 2.5 Plus110 tok/s
Input priceQwen 2.5 Plus +$0.05/1M
MiniMax: MiniMax M2.1$0.3/1M
Qwen 2.5 Plus$0.25/1M
Output priceQwen 2.5 Plus +$0.2/1M
MiniMax: MiniMax M2.1$1.2/1M
Qwen 2.5 Plus$1/1M
Context windowMiniMax: MiniMax M2.1 +77k
MiniMax: MiniMax M2.1205k
Qwen 2.5 Plus128k
BenchmarkMiniMax: MiniMax M2.1Qwen 2.5 PlusAdvantage Delta
Preference Elo—
1,445
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
—
Coding Elo—
1,460
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
—
LiveBench—
63.5%
livebench · Aug 17, 2026
—
SWE-bench—
59.2%
swebench · Aug 17, 2026
—
GPQA Diamond—
75.8%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
—
Time to first token—
180 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
—
Output speed—
110 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
—
Input price
$0.3/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
$0.25/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+$0.05/1M
Output price
$1.2/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
$1/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+$0.2/1M
Context window
205k
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
128k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+77k

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).

Save 17% with Qwen 2.5 Plus
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
MiniMax: MiniMax M2.1$28.50 / mo
In: $10.5Out: $18
Qwen 2.5 Plus$23.75 / mo
In: $8.75Out: $15
Estimated Cost Delta

Qwen 2.5 Plus is estimated to save $4.75/month ($57/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    Qwen 2.5 Plus:Pick Qwen 2.5 Plus when you are optimizing output cost.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsinsufficient data

Need SWE-bench on both sides.

High-volume chatQwen 2.5 Plus

Lower output list price ($1/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient data

Need TTFT on both sides.

Long-document RAGMiniMax: MiniMax M2.1

Larger window (205k).

Screenshots / visionQwen 2.5 Plus

Qwen 2.5 Plus is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsinsufficient dataNeed SWE-bench on both sides.
High-volume chatQwen 2.5 PlusLower output list price ($1/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient dataNeed TTFT on both sides.
Long-document RAGMiniMax: MiniMax M2.1Larger window (205k).
Screenshots / visionQwen 2.5 PlusQwen 2.5 Plus is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Social Share Card Preview

Dynamic OpenGraph banner generated at /compare/minimax-m2-1-vs-qwen-2-5-plus/opengraph-image

Save PNG

CompareLLM AI Matrix

Verified Head-to-Head Telemetry

LIVE BENCHMARK
VS
MiniMax

MiniMax: MiniMax M2.1

Elo n/a
SWE-bench—
Speed (tok/s)205k
Input / 1M Tokens$0.3/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$1.2/1M
Alibaba

Qwen 2.5 Plus

Elo 1,445
SWE-bench59.2%
Speed (tok/s)110 tok/s
Input / 1M Tokens$0.25/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$1/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, MiniMax: MiniMax M2.1 or Qwen 2.5 Plus?
We do not have preference Elo for both models, so we do not declare an overall winner. Compare the metrics that exist.
Which is better at coding, MiniMax: MiniMax M2.1 or Qwen 2.5 Plus?
SWE-bench is missing for at least one model, so we do not rank coding from a single number.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
Qwen 2.5 Plus output tokens are $1/1M versus $1.2/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, MiniMax: MiniMax M2.1 or Qwen 2.5 Plus?
We do not have TTFT for both models.
Which has the larger context window?
MiniMax: MiniMax M2.1 accepts 205k tokens versus 128k.
Can I self-host either model?
Neither model is marked open-weights here. You are comparing hosted APIs.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. MiniMax: MiniMax M2.1 and Qwen 2.5 Plus Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All MiniMax: MiniMax M2.1 matchups →|All Qwen 2.5 Plus matchups →
Qwen 2.5 Plus vs Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct (previous qwen)Qwen 2.5 Plus vs Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B (next qwen)Qwen 3 Max vs Qwen 2.5 PlusQwen QwQ 32B vs Qwen 2.5 PlusMiniMax M2.5 vs Qwen 2.5 PlusClaude Opus 4.5 vs Qwen 2.5 Plus