CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
Explore
Compare
Decide
Track
Learn
…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

Theme:
Currency:
  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. Llama 3.3 70B vs Reka Edge

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 17, 2026noindex (thin pair)

Llama 3.3 70B vs Reka Edge benchmark

In this head-to-head showdown, Reka Edge is more budget-friendly at $0.1/1M per 1M output tokens. Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.

Executive Comparison Verdict

Bottom Line: Choose Llama 3.3 70B if your priority is peak reasoning, complex code generation, and top preference Elo. Choose Reka Edge if you are optimizing for low latency, high throughput, and cost-efficient API deployment.
Share Analysis:Share:
WhatsAppTelegramXLinkedIn
Executive Verdict Summary

Llama 3.3 70B holds empirical advantage (1 of 2 metrics)

Coding / SWESWE-bench
Llama 3.3 70BTop code solve rate
ReasoningGPQA / Live
Llama 3.3 70BTop logical accuracy
Best Value$/1M Tok
Reka EdgeLowest API billing cost
Speed / TokTok/Sec
Llama 3.3 70BFastest stream rate

Verified Advantage Breakdown

2 benchmarks evaluated across capability, speed, and cost

Llama 3.3 70B (1)Reka Edge (1)
Llama 3.3 70B
1 of 2 Wins
✓Context window
Reka Edge
1 of 2 Wins
✓Output price
Meta
Leads 1 of 2
Llama 3.3 70B

Previous Meta 70B open-weight workhorse.

Elo 1,285In: $0.1 · Out: $0.32/1M
rekaai
Leads 1 of 2
Reka Edge

Auto-discovered from OpenRouter (rekaai/reka-edge). Preview until a second source matches.

In: $0.1 · Out: $0.1/1M
Top Rival Showdowns for Llama 3.3 70B
All Matchups
Compare vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5vs GPT-5vs Gemini 3 Provs Grok 4.6vs DeepSeek V4 Pro
Preference Leader

No shared data

Single model data

Throughput Leader

No shared data

No latency data

Value per Dollar LeaderReka Edge Wins

Reka Edge

$0.09999999999999999 / 1M output

Capability Percentiles

Relative percentile scores computed across all active models in the benchmark catalog.

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Leaders Matchup Capability Radar

Comparing top standard models across 6 key capability dimensions. Tap any spoke or dot to inspect.

Tap any node to inspect
0–100 %ile

Overall Matchup Breakdown

Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.

Llama 3.3 70B (7)vsReka Edge (1)
Llama 3.3 70B: 7W (88%)Overall: Llama 3.3 70BReka Edge: 1W (12%)
← Llama 3.3 70B1 tiesReka Edge →
🏆Llama 3.3 70B Leads(4/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Benchmark
Llama 3.3 70BvsReka Edge
Preference Elo
1,285vs—
Coding Elo
—vs—
SWE-bench
45.1%vs—
LiveBench
49.8%vs—
GPQA Diamond
65.7%vs—
Llama 3.3 70B: 4WReka Edge: 0W
🏆Llama 3.3 70B Leads(2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Benchmark
Llama 3.3 70BvsReka Edge
Output speed
140 tok/svs—
Time to first token
160 msvs—
Llama 3.3 70B: 2WReka Edge: 0W
Tied (1-1)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Benchmark
Llama 3.3 70BvsReka Edge
Output price
$0.32/1Mvs$0.1/1M+$0.22/1M
Input price
$0.1/1Mvs$0.1/1M
Context window
131kvs16k+115k
Llama 3.3 70B: 1WReka Edge: 1W

Side-by-Side Benchmark Matrix

Llama 3.3 70BReka Edge
Preference Elo
Llama 3.3 70B1,285
Reka Edge—
LiveBench
Llama 3.3 70B49.8%
Reka Edge—
SWE-bench
Llama 3.3 70B45.1%
Reka Edge—
GPQA Diamond
Llama 3.3 70B65.7%
Reka Edge—
Time to first token
Llama 3.3 70B160 ms
Reka Edge—
Output speed
Llama 3.3 70B140 tok/s
Reka Edge—
Input price
Llama 3.3 70B$0.1/1M
Reka Edge$0.1/1M
Output priceReka Edge +$0.22/1M
Llama 3.3 70B$0.32/1M
Reka Edge$0.1/1M
Context windowLlama 3.3 70B +115k
Llama 3.3 70B131k
Reka Edge16k
BenchmarkLlama 3.3 70BReka EdgeAdvantage Delta
Preference Elo
1,285
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
——
LiveBench
49.8%
livebench · Aug 17, 2026
——
SWE-bench
45.1%
swebench · Aug 17, 2026
——
GPQA Diamond
65.7%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
——
Time to first token
160 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
——
Output speed
140 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
——
Input price
$0.1/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
$0.1/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
—
Output price
$0.32/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
$0.1/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
+$0.22/1M
Context window
131k
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
16k
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
+115k

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).

Save 40% with Reka Edge
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
Llama 3.3 70B$8.30 / mo
In: $3.5Out: $4.8
Reka Edge$5.00 / mo
In: $3.5Out: $1.5
Estimated Cost Delta

Reka Edge is estimated to save $3.30/month ($40/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    Reka Edge:Pick Reka Edge when you are optimizing output cost.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsinsufficient data

Need SWE-bench on both sides.

High-volume chatReka Edge

Lower output list price ($0.1/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient data

Need TTFT on both sides.

Long-document RAGLlama 3.3 70B

Larger window (131k).

Screenshots / visionReka Edge

Reka Edge is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsinsufficient dataNeed SWE-bench on both sides.
High-volume chatReka EdgeLower output list price ($0.1/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient dataNeed TTFT on both sides.
Long-document RAGLlama 3.3 70BLarger window (131k).
Screenshots / visionReka EdgeReka Edge is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

View all news
launchDec 6, 2024

Llama 3.3 70B stays as the previous Meta 70B workhorse

Dec 2024 instruct 70B. Still a self-host baseline. Llama 4 is the 2026 buy.

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Social Share Card Preview

Dynamic OpenGraph banner generated at /compare/llama-3-3-70b-vs-reka-edge/opengraph-image

Save PNG

CompareLLM AI Matrix

Verified Head-to-Head Telemetry

LIVE BENCHMARK
VS
Meta

Llama 3.3 70B

Elo 1,285
SWE-bench45.1%
Speed (tok/s)140 tok/s
Input / 1M Tokens$0.1/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$0.32/1M
rekaai

Reka Edge

Elo n/a
SWE-bench—
Speed (tok/s)16k
Input / 1M Tokens$0.1/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$0.1/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Llama 3.3 70B or Reka Edge?
We do not have preference Elo for both models, so we do not declare an overall winner. Compare the metrics that exist.
Which is better at coding, Llama 3.3 70B or Reka Edge?
SWE-bench is missing for at least one model, so we do not rank coding from a single number.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
Reka Edge output tokens are $0.1/1M versus $0.32/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, Llama 3.3 70B or Reka Edge?
We do not have TTFT for both models.
Which has the larger context window?
Llama 3.3 70B accepts 131k tokens versus 16k.
Can I self-host either model?
Llama 3.3 70B is marked open-weights in our catalog. The other side is a closed API. Check the provider license before you ship weights.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Llama 3.3 70B and Reka Edge Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Related news

  • launch · Dec 6, 2024

    Llama 3.3 70B stays as the previous Meta 70B workhorse

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All Llama 3.3 70B matchups →|All Reka Edge matchups →
Llama 3.3 70B vs Llama 3.1 70B (previous llama)Llama 3.3 70B vs Llama 4 Maverick (next llama)Llama 3.1 405B vs Llama 3.3 70BLlama 4 Scout vs Llama 3.3 70BClaude Opus 4.5 vs Llama 3.3 70BClaude Opus 4.6 vs Llama 3.3 70B