CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
Explore
Compare
Decide
Track
Learn
…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

Theme:
Currency:
  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711 vs Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 17, 2026

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711 vs Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct benchmark

In this head-to-head showdown, MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711 delivers higher overall intelligence and human-preferred responses (Elo 1,465 vs 1,425), while MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711 leads in SWE-bench software engineering benchmarks (65.8%), while Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct is more budget-friendly at $1/1M per 1M output tokens. Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.

Executive Comparison Verdict

Bottom Line: Choose MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711 if your priority is peak reasoning, complex code generation, and top preference Elo. Choose Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct if you are optimizing for low latency, high throughput, and cost-efficient API deployment.
Share Analysis:Share:
WhatsAppTelegramXLinkedIn
Executive Verdict Summary

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711 holds empirical advantage (4 of 7 metrics)

Coding / SWESWE-bench
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711Top code solve rate
ReasoningGPQA / Live
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711Top logical accuracy
Best Value$/1M Tok
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructLowest API billing cost
Speed / TokTok/Sec
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711Fastest stream rate

Verified Advantage Breakdown

7 benchmarks evaluated across capability, speed, and cost

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711 (4)Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct (3)
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711
4 of 7 Wins
✓Preference Elo✓SWE-bench✓Input price✓Context window
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
3 of 7 Wins
✓Coding Elo✓LiveBench✓Output price
Moonshot
Leads 4 of 7
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711

Auto-discovered from OpenRouter (moonshotai/kimi-k2). Preview until a second source matches.

K2 BaseElo 1,465In: $0.57 · Out: $2.3/1M
Alibaba
Leads 3 of 7
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct

Auto-discovered from OpenRouter (qwen/qwen-2.5-coder-32b-instruct). Preview until a second source matches.

Elo 1,425In: $0.66 · Out: $1/1M

Kimi Series Lineage & Sibling Variants

4 models

Currently comparing MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711 vs Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct. Alternative family tiers available.

Active: MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711
Kimi K3$15MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5$2.85Kimi Chat 1.5$0.8
Top Rival Showdowns for MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711
All Matchups
Compare vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5vs GPT-5vs Gemini 3 Provs Grok 4.6vs DeepSeek V4 Pro
Preference LeaderMoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711 Wins

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711

Δ 40 Arena Elo pts

Throughput Leader

No shared data

No latency data

Value per Dollar LeaderQwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct Wins

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct

$1 / 1M output

Capability Percentiles

Relative percentile scores computed across all active models in the benchmark catalog.

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Leaders Matchup Capability Radar

Comparing top standard models across 6 key capability dimensions. Tap any spoke or dot to inspect.

Tap any node to inspect
0–100 %ile

Overall Matchup Breakdown

Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711 (7)vsQwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct (3)
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711: 7W (70%)Overall: MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct: 3W (30%)
← MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct →
🏆MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711 Leads(3/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Benchmark
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711vsQwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
Preference Elo
1,465vs1,425+40
Coding Elo
1,470vs1,495+25
SWE-bench
65.8%vs65.2%+0.6%
LiveBench
62.8%vs64.8%+2%
GPQA Diamond
76.5%vs—
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711: 3WQwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct: 2W
🏆MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711 Leads(2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Benchmark
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711vsQwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
Output speed
85 tok/svs—
Time to first token
240 msvs—
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711: 2WQwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct: 0W
🏆MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711 Leads(2/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Benchmark
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711vsQwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
Output price
$2.3/1Mvs$1/1M+$1.3/1M
Input price
$0.57/1Mvs$0.66/1M+$0.09/1M
Context window
131kvs33k+98k
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711: 2WQwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct: 1W

Side-by-Side Benchmark Matrix

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
Preference EloMoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711 +40
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 07111,465
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct1,425
Coding EloQwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct +25
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 07111,470
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct1,495
LiveBenchQwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct +2%
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 071162.8%
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct64.8%
SWE-benchMoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711 +0.6%
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 071165.8%
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct65.2%
GPQA Diamond
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 071176.5%
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct—
Time to first token
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711240 ms
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct—
Output speed
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 071185 tok/s
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct—
Input priceMoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711 +$0.09/1M
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711$0.57/1M
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct$0.66/1M
Output priceQwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct +$1.3/1M
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711$2.3/1M
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct$1/1M
Context windowMoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711 +98k
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711131k
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct33k
BenchmarkMoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711Qwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructAdvantage Delta
Preference Elo
1,465
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
1,425
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
+40
Coding Elo
1,470
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
1,495
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
+25
LiveBench
62.8%
livebench · Aug 17, 2026
64.8%
livebench · Aug 17, 2026
+2%
SWE-bench
65.8%
swebench · Aug 17, 2026
65.2%
swebench · Aug 17, 2026
+0.6%
GPQA Diamond
76.5%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
——
Time to first token
240 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
——
Output speed
85 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
——
Input price
$0.57/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
$0.66/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
+$0.09/1M
Output price
$2.3/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
$1/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
+$1.3/1M
Context window
131k
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
33k
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
+98k

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).

Save 30% with Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711$54.45 / mo
In: $19.95Out: $34.5
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct$38.10 / mo
In: $23.1Out: $15
Estimated Cost Delta

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct is estimated to save $16.35/month ($196/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711:Pick MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711 when repo-level coding accuracy is the constraint.
  • 2
    Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct:Pick Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct when you are optimizing output cost.
  • 3
    MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711:Pick MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711 as the default general assistant.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsMoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711

Higher SWE-bench (65.8%).

High-volume chatQwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct

Lower output list price ($1/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient data

Need TTFT on both sides.

Long-document RAGMoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711

Larger window (131k).

Screenshots / visionMoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsMoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711Higher SWE-bench (65.8%).
High-volume chatQwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructLower output list price ($1/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient dataNeed TTFT on both sides.
Long-document RAGMoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711Larger window (131k).
Screenshots / visionMoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Social Share Card Preview

Dynamic OpenGraph banner generated at /compare/kimi-k2-vs-qwen-2-5-coder-32b-instruct/opengraph-image

Save PNG

CompareLLM AI Matrix

Verified Head-to-Head Telemetry

LIVE BENCHMARK
VS
Moonshot

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711

Elo 1,465
SWE-bench65.8%
Speed (tok/s)85 tok/s
Input / 1M Tokens$0.57/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$2.3/1M
Alibaba

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct

Elo 1,425
SWE-bench65.2%
Speed (tok/s)33k
Input / 1M Tokens$0.66/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$1/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711 or Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct?
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711 has the higher preference Elo in our latest snapshot (1,465). “Better” still depends on coding, price, and latency — see the table.
Which is better at coding, MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711 or Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct?
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711 leads SWE-bench at 65.8% vs 65.2%. SWE-bench is one harness, not your repo.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct output tokens are $1/1M versus $2.3/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711 or Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct?
We do not have TTFT for both models.
Which has the larger context window?
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711 accepts 131k tokens versus 33k.
Can I self-host either model?
Neither model is marked open-weights here. You are comparing hosted APIs.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711 and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711 matchups →|All Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct matchups →
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711 vs Kimi Chat 1.5 (previous kimi)MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 (next kimi)Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs Qwen 2.5 Plus (next qwen)Qwen 3 Max vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711Kimi K3 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711Qwen QwQ 32B vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711