CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
Explore
Compare
Decide
Track
Learn
…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

Theme:
Currency:
  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 vs Qwen: Qwen3 Coder Plus

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 17, 2026noindex (thin pair)

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 vs Qwen: Qwen3 Coder Plus benchmark

In this head-to-head showdown, MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 is more budget-friendly at $2.85/1M per 1M output tokens. Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.

Executive Comparison Verdict

Bottom Line: Both MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 and Qwen: Qwen3 Coder Plus present distinct architectural strengths. Compare the verified benchmark matrix below to choose the model tailored to your specific application requirements.
Share Analysis:Share:
WhatsAppTelegramXLinkedIn
Executive Verdict Summary

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 holds empirical advantage (2 of 3 metrics)

Coding / SWESWE-bench
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5Top code solve rate
ReasoningGPQA / Live
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5Top logical accuracy
Best Value$/1M Tok
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5Lowest API billing cost
Speed / TokTok/Sec
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5Fastest stream rate

Verified Advantage Breakdown

3 benchmarks evaluated across capability, speed, and cost

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 (2)Qwen: Qwen3 Coder Plus (1)
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5
2 of 3 Wins
✓Input price✓Output price
Qwen: Qwen3 Coder Plus
1 of 3 Wins
✓Context window
Moonshot
Leads 2 of 3
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5

Auto-discovered from OpenRouter (moonshotai/kimi-k2.5). Preview until a second source matches.

K2.5 MaxElo 1,515In: $0.57 · Out: $2.85/1M
Alibaba
Leads 1 of 3
Qwen: Qwen3 Coder Plus

Auto-discovered from OpenRouter (qwen/qwen3-coder-plus). Preview until a second source matches.

In: $0.65 · Out: $3.25/1M

Kimi Series Lineage & Sibling Variants

4 models

Currently comparing MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 vs Qwen: Qwen3 Coder Plus. Alternative family tiers available.

Active: MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5
Kimi K3$15MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711$2.3Kimi Chat 1.5$0.8

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 Thinking Depth & Cost Scaler

Model A

Simulate accuracy gains vs added response time & token cost

Mode: Medium (Deep Reasoning)

Reasoning models “think before answering” by generating internal reasoning tokens. Higher effort improves math, coding, and logic accuracy, but increases response delay and token costs.

Delay
270 ms
Standard
CoT Tokens
~2,500
Internal reasoning
Cost / 1k
$8.27
7.3× base bill
Accuracy Boost
+5.5%
STEM & Logic
Top Rival Showdowns for MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5
All Matchups
Compare vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5vs GPT-5vs Gemini 3 Provs Grok 4.6vs DeepSeek V4 Pro
Preference Leader

No shared data

Single model data

Throughput Leader

No shared data

No latency data

Value per Dollar LeaderMoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 Wins

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5

$2.8499999999999996 / 1M output

Capability Percentiles

Relative percentile scores computed across all active models in the benchmark catalog.

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Leaders Matchup Capability Radar

Comparing top standard models across 6 key capability dimensions. Tap any spoke or dot to inspect.

Tap any node to inspect
0–100 %ile

Overall Matchup Breakdown

Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 (9)vsQwen: Qwen3 Coder Plus (1)
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5: 9W (90%)Overall: MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5Qwen: Qwen3 Coder Plus: 1W (10%)
← MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5Qwen: Qwen3 Coder Plus →
🏆MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 Leads(5/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Benchmark
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5vsQwen: Qwen3 Coder Plus
Preference Elo
1,515vs—
Coding Elo
1,520vs—
SWE-bench
71.3%vs—
LiveBench
67.2%vs—
GPQA Diamond
87.6%vs—
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5: 5WQwen: Qwen3 Coder Plus: 0W
🏆MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 Leads(2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Benchmark
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5vsQwen: Qwen3 Coder Plus
Output speed
72 tok/svs—
Time to first token
270 msvs—
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5: 2WQwen: Qwen3 Coder Plus: 0W
🏆MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 Leads(2/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Benchmark
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5vsQwen: Qwen3 Coder Plus
Output price
$2.85/1Mvs$3.25/1M+$0.4/1M
Input price
$0.57/1Mvs$0.65/1M+$0.08/1M
Context window
262kvs1M+738k
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5: 2WQwen: Qwen3 Coder Plus: 1W

Side-by-Side Benchmark Matrix

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5Qwen: Qwen3 Coder Plus
Preference Elo
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.51,515
Qwen: Qwen3 Coder Plus—
Coding Elo
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.51,520
Qwen: Qwen3 Coder Plus—
LiveBench
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.567.2%
Qwen: Qwen3 Coder Plus—
SWE-bench
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.571.3%
Qwen: Qwen3 Coder Plus—
GPQA Diamond
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.587.6%
Qwen: Qwen3 Coder Plus—
Time to first token
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5270 ms
Qwen: Qwen3 Coder Plus—
Output speed
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.572 tok/s
Qwen: Qwen3 Coder Plus—
Input priceMoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 +$0.08/1M
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5$0.57/1M
Qwen: Qwen3 Coder Plus$0.65/1M
Output priceMoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 +$0.4/1M
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5$2.85/1M
Qwen: Qwen3 Coder Plus$3.25/1M
Context windowQwen: Qwen3 Coder Plus +738k
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5262k
Qwen: Qwen3 Coder Plus1M
BenchmarkMoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5Qwen: Qwen3 Coder PlusAdvantage Delta
Preference Elo
1,515
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
——
Coding Elo
1,520
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
——
LiveBench
67.2%
livebench · Aug 17, 2026
——
SWE-bench
71.3%
swebench · Aug 17, 2026
——
GPQA Diamond
87.6%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
——
Time to first token
270 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
——
Output speed
72 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
——
Input price
$0.57/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
$0.65/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
+$0.08/1M
Output price
$2.85/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
$3.25/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
+$0.4/1M
Context window
262k
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
+738k

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).

Save 12% with MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5$62.70 / mo
In: $19.95Out: $42.75
Qwen: Qwen3 Coder Plus$71.50 / mo
In: $22.75Out: $48.75
Estimated Cost Delta

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 is estimated to save $8.80/month ($106/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5:Pick MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 when you are optimizing output cost.
  • 2
    Qwen: Qwen3 Coder Plus:Pick Qwen: Qwen3 Coder Plus for million-token RAG or long-document jobs.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsinsufficient data

Need SWE-bench on both sides.

High-volume chatMoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5

Lower output list price ($2.85/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient data

Need TTFT on both sides.

Long-document RAGQwen: Qwen3 Coder Plus

Larger window (1M).

Screenshots / visionMoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsinsufficient dataNeed SWE-bench on both sides.
High-volume chatMoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5Lower output list price ($2.85/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient dataNeed TTFT on both sides.
Long-document RAGQwen: Qwen3 Coder PlusLarger window (1M).
Screenshots / visionMoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Social Share Card Preview

Dynamic OpenGraph banner generated at /compare/kimi-k2-5-vs-qwen3-coder-plus/opengraph-image

Save PNG

CompareLLM AI Matrix

Verified Head-to-Head Telemetry

LIVE BENCHMARK
VS
Moonshot

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5

Elo 1,515
SWE-bench71.3%
Speed (tok/s)72 tok/s
Input / 1M Tokens$0.57/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$2.85/1M
Alibaba

Qwen: Qwen3 Coder Plus

Elo n/a
SWE-bench—
Speed (tok/s)1M
Input / 1M Tokens$0.65/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$3.25/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 or Qwen: Qwen3 Coder Plus?
We do not have preference Elo for both models, so we do not declare an overall winner. Compare the metrics that exist.
Which is better at coding, MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 or Qwen: Qwen3 Coder Plus?
SWE-bench is missing for at least one model, so we do not rank coding from a single number.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 output tokens are $2.85/1M versus $3.25/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 or Qwen: Qwen3 Coder Plus?
We do not have TTFT for both models.
Which has the larger context window?
Qwen: Qwen3 Coder Plus accepts 1M tokens versus 262k.
Can I self-host either model?
Neither model is marked open-weights here. You are comparing hosted APIs.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 and Qwen: Qwen3 Coder Plus Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 matchups →|All Qwen: Qwen3 Coder Plus matchups →
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711 (previous kimi)MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 vs Kimi K3 (next kimi)Qwen 3 Max vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5Qwen QwQ 32B vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5Qwen 2.5 Plus vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5