Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 17, 2026noindex (thin pair)

HiDream-O1-Image-1.5 vs Meta: Muse Spark 1.1 benchmark

Name: HiDream-O1-Image-1.5 vs Meta: Muse Spark 1.1 AI benchmark comparison
Creator: CompareLLM
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Comparing verified benchmark accuracy, speed, and token pricing between HiDream-O1-Image-1.5 and Meta: Muse Spark 1.1. Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.

Share Analysis:Share:

WhatsApp Telegram X LinkedIn

Executive Verdict Summary

HiDream-O1-Image-1.5 holds empirical advantage (0 of 0 metrics)

Coding / SWESWE-bench

HiDream-O1-Image-1.5Top code solve rate

ReasoningGPQA / Live

HiDream-O1-Image-1.5Top logical accuracy

Best Value$/1M Tok

Meta: Muse Spark 1.1Lowest API billing cost

Speed / TokTok/Sec

HiDream-O1-Image-1.5Fastest stream rate

HiDream

HiDream-O1-Image-1.5

HiDream high-definition visual generator optimized for photorealism and accurate complex lighting.

Img Elo 1,227$80/1k imgs

No shared data

Single model data

Generation Speed Leader

No shared data

No latency data

Value per Dollar Leader

No shared data

Unpriced

Overall Matchup Breakdown

Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.

HiDream-O1-Image-1.5 (5)vsMeta: Muse Spark 1.1 (0)

HiDream-O1-Image-1.5: 5W (100%)Meta: Muse Spark 1.1: 0W (0%)

← HiDream-O1-Image-1.5Meta: Muse Spark 1.1 →

🏆HiDream-O1-Image-1.5 Leads(3/3)

Visual Quality & Adherence

Arena Preference Elo, prompt fidelity & typography score

Benchmark

HiDream-O1-Image-1.5vsMeta: Muse Spark 1.1

Image Elo

1,227vs—

Prompt adherence

90.5%vs—

Text rendering

91%vs—

HiDream-O1-Image-1.5: 3WMeta: Muse Spark 1.1: 0W

🏆HiDream-O1-Image-1.5 Leads(1/1)

Generation Latency

Time to render full-resolution image snapshot (seconds)

Benchmark

HiDream-O1-Image-1.5vsMeta: Muse Spark 1.1

Generation time

4.1svs—

HiDream-O1-Image-1.5: 1WMeta: Muse Spark 1.1: 0W

🏆HiDream-O1-Image-1.5 Leads(1/1)

Cost Efficiency

API inference cost per 1,000 generated images

Benchmark

HiDream-O1-Image-1.5vsMeta: Muse Spark 1.1

Price per 1k images

$80/1kvs—

HiDream-O1-Image-1.5: 1WMeta: Muse Spark 1.1: 0W

Side-by-Side Benchmark Matrix

HiDream-O1-Image-1.5Meta: Muse Spark 1.1

Image Elo

HiDream-O1-Image-1.51,227

Meta: Muse Spark 1.1—

Generation time

HiDream-O1-Image-1.54.1s

Meta: Muse Spark 1.1—

Price per 1k images

HiDream-O1-Image-1.5$80/1k

Meta: Muse Spark 1.1—

Prompt adherence

HiDream-O1-Image-1.590.5%

Meta: Muse Spark 1.1—

Text rendering

HiDream-O1-Image-1.591%

Meta: Muse Spark 1.1—

Benchmark	HiDream-O1-Image-1.5	Meta: Muse Spark 1.1	Advantage Delta
Image Elo	1,227 seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026	—	—
Generation time	4.1s seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026	—	—
Price per 1k images	$80/1k seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026	—	—
Prompt adherence	90.5% seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026	—	—
Text rendering	91% seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026	—	—

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).

Save 100% with Meta: Muse Spark 1.1

Monthly Image Production Volume25k images / month (25000 imgs)

Quick Presets:

HiDream-O1-Image-1.5$2,000.00 / mo

Rate: $80/1k

Meta: Muse Spark 1.1$0.00 / mo

Rate: $0/1k

Estimated Cost Delta

Meta: Muse Spark 1.1 is estimated to save $2,000.00/month ($24,000/year).

Based on 25k images generated

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsinsufficient data

Need SWE-bench on both sides.

High-volume chatinsufficient data

Need list prices.

Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient data

Need TTFT on both sides.

Long-document RAGinsufficient data

Need context sizes.

Screenshots / visionHiDream-O1-Image-1.5

HiDream-O1-Image-1.5 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target Workload	Recommended Pick	Evaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agents	insufficient data	Need SWE-bench on both sides.
High-volume chat	insufficient data	Need list prices.
Voice / low-latency UI	insufficient data	Need TTFT on both sides.
Long-document RAG	insufficient data	Need context sizes.
Screenshots / vision	HiDream-O1-Image-1.5	HiDream-O1-Image-1.5 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Social Share Card Preview

Dynamic OpenGraph banner generated at /compare/hidream-o1-image-1-5-vs-muse-spark-1-1/opengraph-image

Save PNG

CompareLLM AI Matrix

Verified Head-to-Head Telemetry

LIVE BENCHMARK

HiDream

HiDream-O1-Image-1.5

Elo n/a

SWE-bench—

Speed (tok/s)—

Input / 1M Tokens$80/1k

Output / 1M Tokens$80/1k

Meta: Muse Spark 1.1

Elo n/a

SWE-bench—

Speed (tok/s)1M

Input / 1M Tokens$1.25/1M

Output / 1M Tokens$4.25/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, HiDream-O1-Image-1.5 or Meta: Muse Spark 1.1?: We do not have preference Elo for both models, so we do not declare an overall winner. Compare the metrics that exist.
Which is better at coding, HiDream-O1-Image-1.5 or Meta: Muse Spark 1.1?: SWE-bench is missing for at least one model, so we do not rank coding from a single number.
Which is cheaper to run in production?: List prices are missing for at least one model.
Which is faster, HiDream-O1-Image-1.5 or Meta: Muse Spark 1.1?: We do not have TTFT for both models.
Which has the larger context window?: Context window is missing for at least one model.
Can I self-host either model?: Neither model is marked open-weights here. You are comparing hosted APIs.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?: No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?: Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. HiDream-O1-Image-1.5 and Meta: Muse Spark 1.1 Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All HiDream-O1-Image-1.5 matchups →|All Meta: Muse Spark 1.1 matchups →

HiDream-O1-Image-1.5 vs Luma UNI 1 Max (previous other)HiDream-O1-Image-1.5 vs MAI-Image-2.5 (next other)

Side-by-Side Benchmark Matrix

HiDream-O1-Image-1.5Meta: Muse Spark 1.1

Image Elo

HiDream-O1-Image-1.51,227

Meta: Muse Spark 1.1—

Generation time

HiDream-O1-Image-1.54.1s

Meta: Muse Spark 1.1—

Price per 1k images

HiDream-O1-Image-1.5$80/1k

Meta: Muse Spark 1.1—

Prompt adherence

HiDream-O1-Image-1.590.5%

Meta: Muse Spark 1.1—

Text rendering

HiDream-O1-Image-1.591%

Meta: Muse Spark 1.1—

Benchmark	HiDream-O1-Image-1.5	Meta: Muse Spark 1.1	Advantage Delta
Image Elo	1,227 seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026	—	—
Generation time	4.1s seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026	—	—
Price per 1k images	$80/1k seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026	—	—
Prompt adherence	90.5% seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026	—	—
Text rendering	91% seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026	—	—

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsinsufficient data

Need SWE-bench on both sides.

High-volume chatinsufficient data

Need list prices.

Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient data

Need TTFT on both sides.

Long-document RAGinsufficient data

Need context sizes.

Screenshots / visionHiDream-O1-Image-1.5

HiDream-O1-Image-1.5 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target Workload	Recommended Pick	Evaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agents	insufficient data	Need SWE-bench on both sides.
High-volume chat	insufficient data	Need list prices.
Voice / low-latency UI	insufficient data	Need TTFT on both sides.
Long-document RAG	insufficient data	Need context sizes.
Screenshots / vision	HiDream-O1-Image-1.5	HiDream-O1-Image-1.5 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, HiDream-O1-Image-1.5 or Meta: Muse Spark 1.1?

We do not have preference Elo for both models, so we do not declare an overall winner. Compare the metrics that exist.

Which is better at coding, HiDream-O1-Image-1.5 or Meta: Muse Spark 1.1?

SWE-bench is missing for at least one model, so we do not rank coding from a single number.

Which is cheaper to run in production?

List prices are missing for at least one model.

Which is faster, HiDream-O1-Image-1.5 or Meta: Muse Spark 1.1?

We do not have TTFT for both models.

Which has the larger context window?

Context window is missing for at least one model.

Can I self-host either model?

Neither model is marked open-weights here. You are comparing hosted APIs.

Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?

No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.

What does preference Elo mean on this page?

Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. HiDream-O1-Image-1.5 and Meta: Muse Spark 1.1 Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.