CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
Explore
Compare
Decide
Track
Learn
…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

Theme:
Currency:
  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. SpaceXAI: Grok Build 0.1 vs Kimi Chat 1.5

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 17, 2026noindex (thin pair)

SpaceXAI: Grok Build 0.1 vs Kimi Chat 1.5 benchmark

In this head-to-head showdown, Kimi Chat 1.5 is more budget-friendly at $0.8/1M per 1M output tokens. Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.

Executive Comparison Verdict

Bottom Line: Choose SpaceXAI: Grok Build 0.1 if your priority is peak reasoning, complex code generation, and top preference Elo. Choose Kimi Chat 1.5 if you are optimizing for low latency, high throughput, and cost-efficient API deployment.
Share Analysis:Share:
WhatsAppTelegramXLinkedIn
Executive Verdict Summary

Kimi Chat 1.5 holds empirical advantage (3 of 3 metrics)

Coding / SWESWE-bench
Kimi Chat 1.5Top code solve rate
ReasoningGPQA / Live
Kimi Chat 1.5Top logical accuracy
Best Value$/1M Tok
Kimi Chat 1.5Lowest API billing cost
Speed / TokTok/Sec
Kimi Chat 1.5Fastest stream rate

Verified Advantage Breakdown

3 benchmarks evaluated across capability, speed, and cost

SpaceXAI: Grok Build 0.1 (0)Kimi Chat 1.5 (3)
SpaceXAI: Grok Build 0.1
0 of 3 Wins
Competitive baseline across remaining benchmarks
Kimi Chat 1.5
3 of 3 Wins
✓Input price✓Output price✓Context window
xAI
SpaceXAI: Grok Build 0.1

Auto-discovered from OpenRouter (x-ai/grok-build-0.1). Preview until a second source matches.

In: $1 · Out: $2/1M
Moonshot
Leads 3 of 3
Kimi Chat 1.5

Moonshot ultra-long context model supporting up to 2 million tokens per request.

2M ContextElo 1,420In: $0.2 · Out: $0.8/1M
Top Rival Showdowns for SpaceXAI: Grok Build 0.1
All Matchups
Compare vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5vs GPT-5vs Gemini 3 Provs DeepSeek V4 Provs Qwen 3 Max
Preference Leader

No shared data

Single model data

Throughput Leader

No shared data

No latency data

Value per Dollar LeaderKimi Chat 1.5 Wins

Kimi Chat 1.5

$0.8 / 1M output

Capability Percentiles

Relative percentile scores computed across all active models in the benchmark catalog.

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Leaders Matchup Capability Radar

Comparing top standard models across 6 key capability dimensions. Tap any spoke or dot to inspect.

Tap any node to inspect
0–100 %ile

Overall Matchup Breakdown

Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.

SpaceXAI: Grok Build 0.1 (0)vsKimi Chat 1.5 (10)
SpaceXAI: Grok Build 0.1: 0W (0%)Overall: Kimi Chat 1.5Kimi Chat 1.5: 10W (100%)
← SpaceXAI: Grok Build 0.1Kimi Chat 1.5 →
🏆Kimi Chat 1.5 Leads(5/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Benchmark
SpaceXAI: Grok Build 0.1vsKimi Chat 1.5
Preference Elo
—vs1,420
Coding Elo
—vs1,390
SWE-bench
—vs51%
LiveBench
—vs58%
GPQA Diamond
—vs71.5%
SpaceXAI: Grok Build 0.1: 0WKimi Chat 1.5: 5W
🏆Kimi Chat 1.5 Leads(2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Benchmark
SpaceXAI: Grok Build 0.1vsKimi Chat 1.5
Output speed
—vs95 tok/s
Time to first token
—vs210 ms
SpaceXAI: Grok Build 0.1: 0WKimi Chat 1.5: 2W
🏆Kimi Chat 1.5 Leads(3/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Benchmark
SpaceXAI: Grok Build 0.1vsKimi Chat 1.5
Output price
$2/1Mvs$0.8/1M+$1.2/1M
Input price
$1/1Mvs$0.2/1M+$0.8/1M
Context window
256kvs2M+1.7M
SpaceXAI: Grok Build 0.1: 0WKimi Chat 1.5: 3W

Side-by-Side Benchmark Matrix

SpaceXAI: Grok Build 0.1Kimi Chat 1.5
Preference Elo
SpaceXAI: Grok Build 0.1—
Kimi Chat 1.51,420
Coding Elo
SpaceXAI: Grok Build 0.1—
Kimi Chat 1.51,390
LiveBench
SpaceXAI: Grok Build 0.1—
Kimi Chat 1.558%
SWE-bench
SpaceXAI: Grok Build 0.1—
Kimi Chat 1.551%
GPQA Diamond
SpaceXAI: Grok Build 0.1—
Kimi Chat 1.571.5%
Time to first token
SpaceXAI: Grok Build 0.1—
Kimi Chat 1.5210 ms
Output speed
SpaceXAI: Grok Build 0.1—
Kimi Chat 1.595 tok/s
Input priceKimi Chat 1.5 +$0.8/1M
SpaceXAI: Grok Build 0.1$1/1M
Kimi Chat 1.5$0.2/1M
Output priceKimi Chat 1.5 +$1.2/1M
SpaceXAI: Grok Build 0.1$2/1M
Kimi Chat 1.5$0.8/1M
Context windowKimi Chat 1.5 +1.7M
SpaceXAI: Grok Build 0.1256k
Kimi Chat 1.52M
BenchmarkSpaceXAI: Grok Build 0.1Kimi Chat 1.5Advantage Delta
Preference Elo—
1,420
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
—
Coding Elo—
1,390
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
—
LiveBench—
58%
livebench · Aug 17, 2026
—
SWE-bench—
51%
swebench · Aug 17, 2026
—
GPQA Diamond—
71.5%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
—
Time to first token—
210 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
—
Output speed—
95 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
—
Input price
$1/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
$0.2/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+$0.8/1M
Output price
$2/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
$0.8/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+$1.2/1M
Context window
256k
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
2M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+1.7M

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).

Save 71% with Kimi Chat 1.5
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
SpaceXAI: Grok Build 0.1$65.00 / mo
In: $35Out: $30
Kimi Chat 1.5$19.00 / mo
In: $7Out: $12
Estimated Cost Delta

Kimi Chat 1.5 is estimated to save $46.00/month ($552/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    Kimi Chat 1.5:Pick Kimi Chat 1.5 when you are optimizing output cost.
  • 2
    Kimi Chat 1.5:Pick Kimi Chat 1.5 for million-token RAG or long-document jobs.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsinsufficient data

Need SWE-bench on both sides.

High-volume chatKimi Chat 1.5

Lower output list price ($0.8/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient data

Need TTFT on both sides.

Long-document RAGKimi Chat 1.5

Larger window (2M).

Screenshots / visionKimi Chat 1.5

Kimi Chat 1.5 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsinsufficient dataNeed SWE-bench on both sides.
High-volume chatKimi Chat 1.5Lower output list price ($0.8/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient dataNeed TTFT on both sides.
Long-document RAGKimi Chat 1.5Larger window (2M).
Screenshots / visionKimi Chat 1.5Kimi Chat 1.5 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Social Share Card Preview

Dynamic OpenGraph banner generated at /compare/grok-build-0-1-vs-kimi-1-5-long/opengraph-image

Save PNG

CompareLLM AI Matrix

Verified Head-to-Head Telemetry

LIVE BENCHMARK
VS
xAI

SpaceXAI: Grok Build 0.1

Elo n/a
SWE-bench—
Speed (tok/s)256k
Input / 1M Tokens$1/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$2/1M
Moonshot

Kimi Chat 1.5

Elo 1,420
SWE-bench51%
Speed (tok/s)95 tok/s
Input / 1M Tokens$0.2/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$0.8/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, SpaceXAI: Grok Build 0.1 or Kimi Chat 1.5?
We do not have preference Elo for both models, so we do not declare an overall winner. Compare the metrics that exist.
Which is better at coding, SpaceXAI: Grok Build 0.1 or Kimi Chat 1.5?
SWE-bench is missing for at least one model, so we do not rank coding from a single number.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
Kimi Chat 1.5 output tokens are $0.8/1M versus $2/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, SpaceXAI: Grok Build 0.1 or Kimi Chat 1.5?
We do not have TTFT for both models.
Which has the larger context window?
Kimi Chat 1.5 accepts 2M tokens versus 256k.
Can I self-host either model?
Neither model is marked open-weights here. You are comparing hosted APIs.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. SpaceXAI: Grok Build 0.1 and Kimi Chat 1.5 Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All SpaceXAI: Grok Build 0.1 matchups →|All Kimi Chat 1.5 matchups →
Kimi Chat 1.5 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711 (next kimi)Grok 4.6 vs Kimi Chat 1.5Kimi K3 vs Kimi Chat 1.5Grok 4 vs Kimi Chat 1.5MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 vs Kimi Chat 1.5Grok 3 vs Kimi Chat 1.5