CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
Explore
Compare
Decide
Track
Learn
…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

Theme:
Currency:
  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. Grok 4.6 vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 17, 2026noindex (thin pair)

Grok 4.6 vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B benchmark

In this head-to-head showdown, Grok 4.6 is more budget-friendly at $6/1M per 1M output tokens. Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.

Executive Comparison Verdict

Bottom Line: Both Grok 4.6 and Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B present distinct architectural strengths. Compare the verified benchmark matrix below to choose the model tailored to your specific application requirements.
Share Analysis:Share:
WhatsAppTelegramXLinkedIn
Executive Verdict Summary

Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B holds empirical advantage (1 of 1 metrics)

Coding / SWESWE-bench
Grok 4.6Top code solve rate
ReasoningGPQA / Live
Grok 4.6Top logical accuracy
Best Value$/1M Tok
Grok 4.6Lowest API billing cost
Speed / TokTok/Sec
Grok 4.6Fastest stream rate

Verified Advantage Breakdown

1 benchmarks evaluated across capability, speed, and cost

Grok 4.6 (0)Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B (1)
Grok 4.6
0 of 1 Wins
Competitive baseline across remaining benchmarks
Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
1 of 1 Wins
✓Context window
xAI
Grok 4.6

xAI Aug 12 2026 post-training refresh of Grok 4.5. Same $2/$6 API price, 500k context, stronger agentic traces.

Elo 1,592In: $2 · Out: $6/1M
Alibaba
Leads 1 of 1
Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B

Auto-discovered from OpenRouter (qwen/qwen3.8-2.4t-a95b). Preview until a second source matches.

In: $2 · Out: $6/1M
Top Rival Showdowns for Grok 4.6
All Matchups
Compare vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5vs GPT-5vs Gemini 3 Provs DeepSeek V4 Provs Qwen 3 Max
Preference Leader

No shared data

Single model data

Throughput Leader

No shared data

No latency data

Value per Dollar LeaderGrok 4.6 Wins

Grok 4.6

$6 / 1M output

Capability Percentiles

Relative percentile scores computed across all active models in the benchmark catalog.

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Leaders Matchup Capability Radar

Comparing top standard models across 6 key capability dimensions. Tap any spoke or dot to inspect.

Tap any node to inspect
0–100 %ile

Overall Matchup Breakdown

Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.

Grok 4.6 (7)vsQwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B (1)
Grok 4.6: 7W (88%)Overall: Grok 4.6Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B: 1W (12%)
← Grok 4.62 tiesQwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B →
🏆Grok 4.6 Leads(5/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Benchmark
Grok 4.6vsQwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
Preference Elo
1,592vs—
Coding Elo
1,568vs—
SWE-bench
69.1%vs—
LiveBench
71.4%vs—
GPQA Diamond
84.6%vs—
Grok 4.6: 5WQwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B: 0W
🏆Grok 4.6 Leads(2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Benchmark
Grok 4.6vsQwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
Output speed
118 tok/svs—
Time to first token
195 msvs—
Grok 4.6: 2WQwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B: 0W
🏆Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B Leads(1/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Benchmark
Grok 4.6vsQwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
Output price
$6/1Mvs$6/1M
Input price
$2/1Mvs$2/1M
Context window
500kvs1M+549k
Grok 4.6: 0WQwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B: 1W

Side-by-Side Benchmark Matrix

Grok 4.6Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
Preference Elo
Grok 4.61,592
Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B—
Coding Elo
Grok 4.61,568
Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B—
LiveBench
Grok 4.671.4%
Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B—
SWE-bench
Grok 4.669.1%
Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B—
GPQA Diamond
Grok 4.684.6%
Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B—
Time to first token
Grok 4.6195 ms
Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B—
Output speed
Grok 4.6118 tok/s
Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B—
Input price
Grok 4.6$2/1M
Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B$2/1M
Output price
Grok 4.6$6/1M
Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B$6/1M
Context windowQwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B +549k
Grok 4.6500k
Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B1M
BenchmarkGrok 4.6Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95BAdvantage Delta
Preference Elo
1,592
lmarena · Aug 16, 2026
——
Coding Elo
1,568
lmarena · Aug 16, 2026
——
LiveBench
71.4%
livebench · Aug 16, 2026
——
SWE-bench
69.1%
swebench · Aug 16, 2026
——
GPQA Diamond
84.6%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
——
Time to first token
195 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
——
Output speed
118 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
——
Input price
$2/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
$2/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
—
Output price
$6/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
$6/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
—
Context window
500k
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
+549k

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).

Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
Grok 4.6$160.00 / mo
In: $70Out: $90
Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B$160.00 / mo
In: $70Out: $90

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    Grok 4.6:Pick Grok 4.6 when you are optimizing output cost.
  • 2
    Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B:Pick Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B for million-token RAG or long-document jobs.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsinsufficient data

Need SWE-bench on both sides.

High-volume chatGrok 4.6

Lower output list price ($6/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient data

Need TTFT on both sides.

Long-document RAGQwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B

Larger window (1M).

Screenshots / visionGrok 4.6

Grok 4.6 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsinsufficient dataNeed SWE-bench on both sides.
High-volume chatGrok 4.6Lower output list price ($6/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient dataNeed TTFT on both sides.
Long-document RAGQwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95BLarger window (1M).
Screenshots / visionGrok 4.6Grok 4.6 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

View all news
compareAug 12, 2026

Grok vs ChatGPT: price and Elo, not a personality contest

Brand hub remaps to top xAI vs top OpenAI. After Aug 12 that is Grok 4.6 vs Sol.

launchAug 12, 2026

Grok 4.6 (Aug 12): post-training refresh, same $2/$6 list

xAI’s Aug 12 2026 refresh of Grok 4.5. 500k context. The Grok vs ChatGPT hub remaps here.

launchJul 10, 2025

Grok 4 remains the previous xAI flagship on this catalog

2025-07 row. 4.6 is the buy. We keep 4 so upgrade pairs and old inbound links resolve.

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Social Share Card Preview

Dynamic OpenGraph banner generated at /compare/grok-4-6-vs-qwen3-8-2-4t-a95b/opengraph-image

Save PNG

CompareLLM AI Matrix

Verified Head-to-Head Telemetry

LIVE BENCHMARK
VS
xAI

Grok 4.6

Elo 1,592
SWE-bench69.1%
Speed (tok/s)118 tok/s
Input / 1M Tokens$2/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$6/1M
Alibaba

Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B

Elo n/a
SWE-bench—
Speed (tok/s)1M
Input / 1M Tokens$2/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$6/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Grok 4.6 or Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B?
We do not have preference Elo for both models, so we do not declare an overall winner. Compare the metrics that exist.
Which is better at coding, Grok 4.6 or Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B?
SWE-bench is missing for at least one model, so we do not rank coding from a single number.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
Grok 4.6 output tokens are $6/1M versus $6/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, Grok 4.6 or Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B?
We do not have TTFT for both models.
Which has the larger context window?
Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B accepts 1M tokens versus 500k.
Can I self-host either model?
Neither model is marked open-weights here. You are comparing hosted APIs.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Grok 4.6 and Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Related news

  • compare · Aug 12, 2026

    Grok vs ChatGPT: price and Elo, not a personality contest

  • launch · Aug 12, 2026

    Grok 4.6 (Aug 12): post-training refresh, same $2/$6 list

  • launch · Jul 10, 2025

    Grok 4 remains the previous xAI flagship on this catalog

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All Grok 4.6 matchups →|All Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B matchups →
Grok 4.6 vs Grok 4 (previous grok)Qwen 3 Max vs Grok 4.6Qwen QwQ 32B vs Grok 4.6Claude Opus 4.8 vs Grok 4.6GPT-5.6 Sol vs Grok 4.6Claude Opus 4.6 vs Grok 4.6