CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
Explore
Compare
Decide
Track
Learn
…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

Theme:
Currency:
  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. Grok 3 vs SpaceXAI: Grok Build 0.1

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 17, 2026noindex (thin pair)

Grok 3 vs SpaceXAI: Grok Build 0.1 benchmark

In this head-to-head showdown, SpaceXAI: Grok Build 0.1 is more budget-friendly at $2/1M per 1M output tokens. Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.

Executive Comparison Verdict

Bottom Line: Choose Grok 3 if your priority is peak reasoning, complex code generation, and top preference Elo. Choose SpaceXAI: Grok Build 0.1 if you are optimizing for low latency, high throughput, and cost-efficient API deployment.
Share Analysis:Share:
WhatsAppTelegramXLinkedIn
Executive Verdict Summary

SpaceXAI: Grok Build 0.1 holds empirical advantage (3 of 3 metrics)

Coding / SWESWE-bench
Grok 3Top code solve rate
ReasoningGPQA / Live
Grok 3Top logical accuracy
Best Value$/1M Tok
SpaceXAI: Grok Build 0.1Lowest API billing cost
Speed / TokTok/Sec
Grok 3Fastest stream rate

Verified Advantage Breakdown

3 benchmarks evaluated across capability, speed, and cost

Grok 3 (0)SpaceXAI: Grok Build 0.1 (3)
Grok 3
0 of 3 Wins
Competitive baseline across remaining benchmarks
SpaceXAI: Grok Build 0.1
3 of 3 Wins
✓Input price✓Output price✓Context window
xAI
Grok 3

Previous xAI generation before Grok 4. Kept for grok 3 vs grok 4.

Elo 1,405In: $3 · Out: $15/1M
xAI
Leads 3 of 3
SpaceXAI: Grok Build 0.1

Auto-discovered from OpenRouter (x-ai/grok-build-0.1). Preview until a second source matches.

In: $1 · Out: $2/1M
Top Rival Showdowns for Grok 3
All Matchups
Compare vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5vs GPT-5vs Gemini 3 Provs DeepSeek V4 Provs Qwen 3 Max
Preference Leader

No shared data

Single model data

Throughput Leader

No shared data

No latency data

Value per Dollar LeaderSpaceXAI: Grok Build 0.1 Wins

SpaceXAI: Grok Build 0.1

$2 / 1M output

Capability Percentiles

Relative percentile scores computed across all active models in the benchmark catalog.

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Leaders Matchup Capability Radar

Comparing top standard models across 6 key capability dimensions. Tap any spoke or dot to inspect.

Tap any node to inspect
0–100 %ile

Overall Matchup Breakdown

Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.

Grok 3 (6)vsSpaceXAI: Grok Build 0.1 (3)
Grok 3: 6W (67%)Overall: Grok 3SpaceXAI: Grok Build 0.1: 3W (33%)
← Grok 3SpaceXAI: Grok Build 0.1 →
🏆Grok 3 Leads(4/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Benchmark
Grok 3vsSpaceXAI: Grok Build 0.1
Preference Elo
1,405vs—
Coding Elo
—vs—
SWE-bench
51.4%vs—
LiveBench
60.2%vs—
GPQA Diamond
74.2%vs—
Grok 3: 4WSpaceXAI: Grok Build 0.1: 0W
🏆Grok 3 Leads(2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Benchmark
Grok 3vsSpaceXAI: Grok Build 0.1
Output speed
88 tok/svs—
Time to first token
250 msvs—
Grok 3: 2WSpaceXAI: Grok Build 0.1: 0W
🏆SpaceXAI: Grok Build 0.1 Leads(3/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Benchmark
Grok 3vsSpaceXAI: Grok Build 0.1
Output price
$15/1Mvs$2/1M+$13/1M
Input price
$3/1Mvs$1/1M+$2/1M
Context window
131kvs256k+125k
Grok 3: 0WSpaceXAI: Grok Build 0.1: 3W

Side-by-Side Benchmark Matrix

Grok 3SpaceXAI: Grok Build 0.1
Preference Elo
Grok 31,405
SpaceXAI: Grok Build 0.1—
LiveBench
Grok 360.2%
SpaceXAI: Grok Build 0.1—
SWE-bench
Grok 351.4%
SpaceXAI: Grok Build 0.1—
GPQA Diamond
Grok 374.2%
SpaceXAI: Grok Build 0.1—
Time to first token
Grok 3250 ms
SpaceXAI: Grok Build 0.1—
Output speed
Grok 388 tok/s
SpaceXAI: Grok Build 0.1—
Input priceSpaceXAI: Grok Build 0.1 +$2/1M
Grok 3$3/1M
SpaceXAI: Grok Build 0.1$1/1M
Output priceSpaceXAI: Grok Build 0.1 +$13/1M
Grok 3$15/1M
SpaceXAI: Grok Build 0.1$2/1M
Context windowSpaceXAI: Grok Build 0.1 +125k
Grok 3131k
SpaceXAI: Grok Build 0.1256k
BenchmarkGrok 3SpaceXAI: Grok Build 0.1Advantage Delta
Preference Elo
1,405
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
——
LiveBench
60.2%
livebench · Aug 17, 2026
——
SWE-bench
51.4%
swebench · Aug 17, 2026
——
GPQA Diamond
74.2%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
——
Time to first token
250 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
——
Output speed
88 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
——
Input price
$3/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
$1/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
+$2/1M
Output price
$15/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
$2/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
+$13/1M
Context window
131k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
256k
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
+125k

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).

Save 80% with SpaceXAI: Grok Build 0.1
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
Grok 3$330.00 / mo
In: $105Out: $225
SpaceXAI: Grok Build 0.1$65.00 / mo
In: $35Out: $30
Estimated Cost Delta

SpaceXAI: Grok Build 0.1 is estimated to save $265.00/month ($3,180/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    SpaceXAI: Grok Build 0.1:Pick SpaceXAI: Grok Build 0.1 when you are optimizing output cost.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsinsufficient data

Need SWE-bench on both sides.

High-volume chatSpaceXAI: Grok Build 0.1

Lower output list price ($2/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient data

Need TTFT on both sides.

Long-document RAGSpaceXAI: Grok Build 0.1

Larger window (256k).

Screenshots / visionGrok 3

Grok 3 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsinsufficient dataNeed SWE-bench on both sides.
High-volume chatSpaceXAI: Grok Build 0.1Lower output list price ($2/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient dataNeed TTFT on both sides.
Long-document RAGSpaceXAI: Grok Build 0.1Larger window (256k).
Screenshots / visionGrok 3Grok 3 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Social Share Card Preview

Dynamic OpenGraph banner generated at /compare/grok-3-vs-grok-build-0-1/opengraph-image

Save PNG

CompareLLM AI Matrix

Verified Head-to-Head Telemetry

LIVE BENCHMARK
VS
xAI

Grok 3

Elo 1,405
SWE-bench51.4%
Speed (tok/s)88 tok/s
Input / 1M Tokens$3/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$15/1M
xAI

SpaceXAI: Grok Build 0.1

Elo n/a
SWE-bench—
Speed (tok/s)256k
Input / 1M Tokens$1/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$2/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Grok 3 or SpaceXAI: Grok Build 0.1?
We do not have preference Elo for both models, so we do not declare an overall winner. Compare the metrics that exist.
Which is better at coding, Grok 3 or SpaceXAI: Grok Build 0.1?
SWE-bench is missing for at least one model, so we do not rank coding from a single number.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
SpaceXAI: Grok Build 0.1 output tokens are $2/1M versus $15/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, Grok 3 or SpaceXAI: Grok Build 0.1?
We do not have TTFT for both models.
Which has the larger context window?
SpaceXAI: Grok Build 0.1 accepts 256k tokens versus 131k.
Can I self-host either model?
Neither model is marked open-weights here. You are comparing hosted APIs.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Grok 3 and SpaceXAI: Grok Build 0.1 Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All Grok 3 matchups →|All SpaceXAI: Grok Build 0.1 matchups →
Grok 3 vs Grok 4 (next grok)Grok 4.6 vs Grok 3Mistral Large 3 vs Grok 3Doubao Pro 1.5 vs Grok 3Yi-Lightning vs Grok 3Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking vs Grok 3