Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 1, 2026
In this head-to-head showdown, GLM-5V Turbo delivers higher overall intelligence and human-preferred responses (Elo 1,475 vs 1,425), while GLM-5V Turbo leads in SWE-bench software engineering benchmarks (65.2%), while GLM-5V Turbo is more budget-friendly at $0.6/1M per 1M output tokens. Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.
8 direct benchmark disciplines evaluated across capability, speed, and cost
Zhipu high-throughput multimodal vision model with sub-second latency and competitive coding.
Alibaba dedicated open-weight code generation model with near-frontier SWE-bench Verified coding capability.
Currently comparing GLM-5V Turbo vs Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B. Alternative family tiers available.
Δ 50 Arena Elo pts
112 tok/s
$0.6 / 1M output
Relative percentile scores computed across all active models in the benchmark catalog.
Comparing top Western standard models with China's leading frontier rival across 6 skill dimensions. Tap any spoke or dot to inspect.
Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.
Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy
Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness
Cost per million tokens and max context window length
| Benchmark | GLM-5V Turbo | Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B | Advantage Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| Preference Elo | +50 | ||
| Coding Elo | +13 | ||
| LiveBench | +1% | ||
| SWE-bench | — | ||
| GPQA Diamond | +3.4% | ||
| Time to first token | — | ||
| Output speed | 112 tok/s | 110 tok/s | +2 tok/s |
| Input price | $0.15/1M | $0.18/1M | +$0.03/1M |
| Output price | $0.6/1M | $0.72/1M | +$0.12/1M |
| Context window | +3k |
Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).
GLM-5V Turbo is estimated to save $2.85/month ($34/year).
Higher SWE-bench (65.2%).
Lower output list price ($0.6/1M).
Lower TTFT (180 ms).
Larger window (131k).
GLM-5V Turbo is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.
| Target Workload | Recommended Pick | Evaluation Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Repo / coding agents | GLM-5V Turbo | Higher SWE-bench (65.2%). |
| High-volume chat | GLM-5V Turbo | Lower output list price ($0.6/1M). |
| Voice / low-latency UI | GLM-5V Turbo | Lower TTFT (180 ms). |
| Long-document RAG | Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B | Larger window (131k). |
| Screenshots / vision | GLM-5V Turbo | GLM-5V Turbo is the side marked multimodal in the catalog. |
No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!
Dynamic OpenGraph banner generated at /compare/glm-5v-turbo-vs-qwen-2-5-coder-32b/opengraph-image
Verified Head-to-Head Telemetry