CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
Explore
Compare
Decide
Track
Learn
…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

Theme:
Currency:
  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. GLM-5.3 vs OpenAI: GPT-5.4 Image 2

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 17, 2026noindex (thin pair)

GLM-5.3 vs OpenAI: GPT-5.4 Image 2 benchmark

In this head-to-head showdown, GLM-5.3 is more budget-friendly at $1.8/1M per 1M output tokens. Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.

Executive Comparison Verdict

Bottom Line: Both GLM-5.3 and OpenAI: GPT-5.4 Image 2 present distinct architectural strengths. Compare the verified benchmark matrix below to choose the model tailored to your specific application requirements.
Share Analysis:Share:
WhatsAppTelegramXLinkedIn
Executive Verdict Summary

GLM-5.3 holds empirical advantage (2 of 3 metrics)

Coding / SWESWE-bench
GLM-5.3Top code solve rate
ReasoningGPQA / Live
GLM-5.3Top logical accuracy
Best Value$/1M Tok
GLM-5.3Lowest API billing cost
Speed / TokTok/Sec
GLM-5.3Fastest stream rate

Verified Advantage Breakdown

3 benchmarks evaluated across capability, speed, and cost

GLM-5.3 (2)OpenAI: GPT-5.4 Image 2 (1)
GLM-5.3
2 of 3 Wins
✓Input price✓Output price
OpenAI: GPT-5.4 Image 2
1 of 3 Wins
✓Context window
Zhipu
Leads 2 of 3
GLM-5.3

Z.ai Aug 14 2026 post-train of the GLM-5.2 744B base. Coding-plan live; open weights promised after a two-week safety review (z.ai/blog/glm-5.3).

Elo 1,558In: $0.5 · Out: $1.8/1M
OpenAI
Leads 1 of 3
OpenAI: GPT-5.4 Image 2

Auto-discovered from OpenRouter (openai/gpt-5.4-image-2). Preview until a second source matches.

In: $8 · Out: $15/1M
Top Rival Showdowns for GLM-5.3
All Matchups
Compare vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5vs GPT-5vs Gemini 3 Provs Grok 4.6vs DeepSeek V4 Pro
Preference Leader

No shared data

Single model data

Throughput Leader

No shared data

No latency data

Value per Dollar LeaderGLM-5.3 Wins

GLM-5.3

$1.8 / 1M output

Capability Percentiles

Relative percentile scores computed across all active models in the benchmark catalog.

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Leaders Matchup Capability Radar

Comparing top standard models across 6 key capability dimensions. Tap any spoke or dot to inspect.

Tap any node to inspect
0–100 %ile

Overall Matchup Breakdown

Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.

GLM-5.3 (9)vsOpenAI: GPT-5.4 Image 2 (1)
GLM-5.3: 9W (90%)Overall: GLM-5.3OpenAI: GPT-5.4 Image 2: 1W (10%)
← GLM-5.3OpenAI: GPT-5.4 Image 2 →
🏆GLM-5.3 Leads(5/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Benchmark
GLM-5.3vsOpenAI: GPT-5.4 Image 2
Preference Elo
1,558vs—
Coding Elo
1,586vs—
SWE-bench
76.4%vs—
LiveBench
70.8%vs—
GPQA Diamond
83.2%vs—
GLM-5.3: 5WOpenAI: GPT-5.4 Image 2: 0W
🏆GLM-5.3 Leads(2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Benchmark
GLM-5.3vsOpenAI: GPT-5.4 Image 2
Output speed
90 tok/svs—
Time to first token
255 msvs—
GLM-5.3: 2WOpenAI: GPT-5.4 Image 2: 0W
🏆GLM-5.3 Leads(2/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Benchmark
GLM-5.3vsOpenAI: GPT-5.4 Image 2
Output price
$1.8/1Mvs$15/1M+$13.2/1M
Input price
$0.5/1Mvs$8/1M+$7.5/1M
Context window
200kvs272k+72k
GLM-5.3: 2WOpenAI: GPT-5.4 Image 2: 1W

Side-by-Side Benchmark Matrix

GLM-5.3OpenAI: GPT-5.4 Image 2
Preference Elo
GLM-5.31,558
OpenAI: GPT-5.4 Image 2—
Coding Elo
GLM-5.31,586
OpenAI: GPT-5.4 Image 2—
LiveBench
GLM-5.370.8%
OpenAI: GPT-5.4 Image 2—
SWE-bench
GLM-5.376.4%
OpenAI: GPT-5.4 Image 2—
GPQA Diamond
GLM-5.383.2%
OpenAI: GPT-5.4 Image 2—
Time to first token
GLM-5.3255 ms
OpenAI: GPT-5.4 Image 2—
Output speed
GLM-5.390 tok/s
OpenAI: GPT-5.4 Image 2—
Input priceGLM-5.3 +$7.5/1M
GLM-5.3$0.5/1M
OpenAI: GPT-5.4 Image 2$8/1M
Output priceGLM-5.3 +$13.2/1M
GLM-5.3$1.8/1M
OpenAI: GPT-5.4 Image 2$15/1M
Context windowOpenAI: GPT-5.4 Image 2 +72k
GLM-5.3200k
OpenAI: GPT-5.4 Image 2272k
BenchmarkGLM-5.3OpenAI: GPT-5.4 Image 2Advantage Delta
Preference Elo
1,558
lmarena · Aug 16, 2026
——
Coding Elo
1,586
lmarena · Aug 16, 2026
——
LiveBench
70.8%
livebench · Aug 16, 2026
——
SWE-bench
76.4%
swebench · Aug 16, 2026
——
GPQA Diamond
83.2%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
——
Time to first token
255 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
——
Output speed
90 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
——
Input price
$0.5/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
$8/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
+$7.5/1M
Output price
$1.8/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
$15/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
+$13.2/1M
Context window
200k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
272k
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
+72k

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).

Save 91% with GLM-5.3
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
GLM-5.3$44.50 / mo
In: $17.5Out: $27
OpenAI: GPT-5.4 Image 2$505.00 / mo
In: $280Out: $225
Estimated Cost Delta

GLM-5.3 is estimated to save $460.50/month ($5,526/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    GLM-5.3:Pick GLM-5.3 when you are optimizing output cost.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsinsufficient data

Need SWE-bench on both sides.

High-volume chatGLM-5.3

Lower output list price ($1.8/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient data

Need TTFT on both sides.

Long-document RAGOpenAI: GPT-5.4 Image 2

Larger window (272k).

Screenshots / visionGLM-5.3

GLM-5.3 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsinsufficient dataNeed SWE-bench on both sides.
High-volume chatGLM-5.3Lower output list price ($1.8/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient dataNeed TTFT on both sides.
Long-document RAGOpenAI: GPT-5.4 Image 2Larger window (272k).
Screenshots / visionGLM-5.3GLM-5.3 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

View all news
launchAug 14, 2026

GLM-5.3 (Aug 14): Z.ai post-train of the 5.2 744B base

Coding-plan live; open weights promised after a two-week safety review. Newest Zhipu row.

launchJun 18, 2026

GLM-5.2 remains the prior Zhipu flagship for upgrade pairs

Strong Chinese/English coding. 5.3 is the new row; 5.2 stays so the delta is visible.

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Social Share Card Preview

Dynamic OpenGraph banner generated at /compare/glm-5-3-vs-gpt-5-4-image-2/opengraph-image

Save PNG

CompareLLM AI Matrix

Verified Head-to-Head Telemetry

LIVE BENCHMARK
VS
Zhipu

GLM-5.3

Elo 1,558
SWE-bench76.4%
Speed (tok/s)90 tok/s
Input / 1M Tokens$0.5/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$1.8/1M
OpenAI

OpenAI: GPT-5.4 Image 2

Elo n/a
SWE-bench—
Speed (tok/s)272k
Input / 1M Tokens$8/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$15/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, GLM-5.3 or OpenAI: GPT-5.4 Image 2?
We do not have preference Elo for both models, so we do not declare an overall winner. Compare the metrics that exist.
Which is better at coding, GLM-5.3 or OpenAI: GPT-5.4 Image 2?
SWE-bench is missing for at least one model, so we do not rank coding from a single number.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
GLM-5.3 output tokens are $1.8/1M versus $15/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, GLM-5.3 or OpenAI: GPT-5.4 Image 2?
We do not have TTFT for both models.
Which has the larger context window?
OpenAI: GPT-5.4 Image 2 accepts 272k tokens versus 200k.
Can I self-host either model?
Neither model is marked open-weights here. You are comparing hosted APIs.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. GLM-5.3 and OpenAI: GPT-5.4 Image 2 Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Related news

  • launch · Aug 14, 2026

    GLM-5.3 (Aug 14): Z.ai post-train of the 5.2 744B base

  • launch · Jun 18, 2026

    GLM-5.2 remains the prior Zhipu flagship for upgrade pairs

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All GLM-5.3 matchups →|All OpenAI: GPT-5.4 Image 2 matchups →
GLM-5.3 vs Z.ai: GLM 5V Turbo (previous glm)GPT-5 vs GLM-5.3GPT-5.6 Terra vs GLM-5.3GPT-4.5 Orion vs GLM-5.3GPT-5.6 Sol vs GLM-5.3GLM-5.2 vs GLM-5.3