CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
Explore
Compare
Decide
Track
Learn
…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

Theme:
Currency:
  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. GLM-5.2 vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 Max Preview
Independent ReportPairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 17, 2026
noindex (thin pair)
GLM-5.2(Zhipu)
vs
Qwen: Qwen3.6 Max Preview(Alibaba)

GLM-5.2 vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 Max Preview benchmark

In this head-to-head showdown, GLM-5.2 is more budget-friendly at $3.74/1M per 1M output tokens. Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.

Executive Comparison Verdict

Bottom Line: Both GLM-5.2 and Qwen: Qwen3.6 Max Preview present distinct architectural strengths. Compare the verified benchmark matrix below to choose the model tailored to your specific application requirements.
Share Analysis:Share:
WhatsAppTelegramXLinkedIn
Executive Verdict Summary

GLM-5.2 holds empirical advantage (2 of 3 metrics)

Coding / SWESWE-bench
GLM-5.2Top code solve rate
ReasoningGPQA / Live
GLM-5.2Top logical accuracy
Best Value$/1M Tok
GLM-5.2Lowest API billing cost
Speed / TokTok/Sec
GLM-5.2Fastest stream rate

Verified Advantage Breakdown

3 benchmarks evaluated across capability, speed, and cost

GLM-5.2 (2)Qwen: Qwen3.6 Max Preview (1)
GLM-5.2
2 of 3 Wins
✓Output price✓Context window
Qwen: Qwen3.6 Max Preview
1 of 3 Wins
✓Input price
Zhipu
Leads 2 of 3
GLM-5.2

Zhipu flagship. Strong Chinese/English coding and agents.

GLM-5.2Elo 1,492In: $1.19 · Out: $3.74/1M
Alibaba
Leads 1 of 3
Qwen: Qwen3.6 Max Preview

Auto-discovered from OpenRouter (qwen/qwen3.6-max-preview). Preview until a second source matches.

In: $1.027 · Out: $6.162/1M

GLM-5 Series Lineage & Sibling Variants

2 models

Currently comparing GLM-5.2 vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 Max Preview. Alternative family tiers available.

Active: GLM-5.2
GLM-5.3$1.8
Top Rival Showdowns for GLM-5.2
All Matchups
Compare vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5vs GPT-5vs Gemini 3 Provs Grok 4.6vs DeepSeek V4 Pro
Preference Leader

No shared data

Single model data

Throughput Leader

No shared data

No latency data

Value per Dollar LeaderGLM-5.2 Wins

GLM-5.2

$3.74 / 1M output

Capability Percentiles

Relative percentile scores computed across all active models in the benchmark catalog.

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Leaders Matchup Capability Radar

Comparing top standard models across 6 key capability dimensions. Tap any spoke or dot to inspect.

Tap any node to inspect
0–100 %ile

Overall Matchup Breakdown

Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.

GLM-5.2 (9)vsQwen: Qwen3.6 Max Preview (1)
GLM-5.2: 9W (90%)Overall: GLM-5.2Qwen: Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 1W (10%)
← GLM-5.2Qwen: Qwen3.6 Max Preview →
🏆GLM-5.2 Leads(5/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Benchmark
GLM-5.2vsQwen: Qwen3.6 Max Preview
Preference Elo
1,492vs—
Coding Elo
1,504vs—
SWE-bench
69.3%vs—
LiveBench
65.2%vs—
GPQA Diamond
79.5%vs—
GLM-5.2: 5WQwen: Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 0W
🏆GLM-5.2 Leads(2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Benchmark
GLM-5.2vsQwen: Qwen3.6 Max Preview
Output speed
84 tok/svs—
Time to first token
270 msvs—
GLM-5.2: 2WQwen: Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 0W
🏆GLM-5.2 Leads(2/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Benchmark
GLM-5.2vsQwen: Qwen3.6 Max Preview
Output price
$3.74/1Mvs$6.162/1M+$2.422/1M
Input price
$1.19/1Mvs$1.027/1M+$0.163/1M
Context window
1Mvs262k+786k
GLM-5.2: 2WQwen: Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 1W

Side-by-Side Benchmark Matrix

GLM-5.2Qwen: Qwen3.6 Max Preview
Preference Elo
GLM-5.21,492
Qwen: Qwen3.6 Max Preview—
Coding Elo
GLM-5.21,504
Qwen: Qwen3.6 Max Preview—
LiveBench
GLM-5.265.2%
Qwen: Qwen3.6 Max Preview—
SWE-bench
GLM-5.269.3%
Qwen: Qwen3.6 Max Preview—
GPQA Diamond
GLM-5.279.5%
Qwen: Qwen3.6 Max Preview—
Time to first token
GLM-5.2270 ms
Qwen: Qwen3.6 Max Preview—
Output speed
GLM-5.284 tok/s
Qwen: Qwen3.6 Max Preview—
Input priceQwen: Qwen3.6 Max Preview +$0.163/1M
GLM-5.2$1.19/1M
Qwen: Qwen3.6 Max Preview$1.027/1M
Output priceGLM-5.2 +$2.422/1M
GLM-5.2$3.74/1M
Qwen: Qwen3.6 Max Preview$6.162/1M
Context windowGLM-5.2 +786k
GLM-5.21M
Qwen: Qwen3.6 Max Preview262k
BenchmarkGLM-5.2Qwen: Qwen3.6 Max PreviewAdvantage Delta
Preference Elo
1,492
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
——
Coding Elo
1,504
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
——
LiveBench
65.2%
livebench · Aug 17, 2026
——
SWE-bench
69.3%
swebench · Aug 17, 2026
——
GPQA Diamond
79.5%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
——
Time to first token
270 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
——
Output speed
84 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
——
Input price
$1.19/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
$1.027/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
+$0.163/1M
Output price
$3.74/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
$6.162/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
+$2.422/1M
Context window
1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
262k
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
+786k

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).

Save 24% with GLM-5.2
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
GLM-5.2$97.75 / mo
In: $41.65Out: $56.1
Qwen: Qwen3.6 Max Preview$128.38 / mo
In: $35.95Out: $92.43
Estimated Cost Delta

GLM-5.2 is estimated to save $30.63/month ($368/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    GLM-5.2:Pick GLM-5.2 when you are optimizing output cost.
  • 2
    GLM-5.2:Pick GLM-5.2 for million-token RAG or long-document jobs.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsinsufficient data

Need SWE-bench on both sides.

High-volume chatGLM-5.2

Lower output list price ($3.74/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient data

Need TTFT on both sides.

Long-document RAGGLM-5.2

Larger window (1M).

Screenshots / visionGLM-5.2

GLM-5.2 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsinsufficient dataNeed SWE-bench on both sides.
High-volume chatGLM-5.2Lower output list price ($3.74/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient dataNeed TTFT on both sides.
Long-document RAGGLM-5.2Larger window (1M).
Screenshots / visionGLM-5.2GLM-5.2 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

View all news
newsAug 16, 2026

GLM-5.2 vs GLM 5V Turbo Price and SWE-bench 2026

GLM-5.2 undercuts GLM 5V Turbo by 74.2% on input at $0.31/1M, with 1,492 Elo and 69.3% SWE-bench in dated 2026 snapshots.

launchJun 18, 2026

GLM-5.2 remains the prior Zhipu flagship for upgrade pairs

Strong Chinese/English coding. 5.3 is the new row; 5.2 stays so the delta is visible.

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Social Share Card Preview

Dynamic OpenGraph banner generated at /compare/glm-5-2-vs-qwen3-6-max-preview/opengraph-image

Save PNG

CompareLLM AI Matrix

Verified Head-to-Head Telemetry

LIVE BENCHMARK
VS
Zhipu

GLM-5.2

Elo 1,492
SWE-bench69.3%
Speed (tok/s)84 tok/s
Input / 1M Tokens$1.19/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$3.74/1M
Alibaba

Qwen: Qwen3.6 Max Preview

Elo n/a
SWE-bench—
Speed (tok/s)262k
Input / 1M Tokens$1.027/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$6.162/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, GLM-5.2 or Qwen: Qwen3.6 Max Preview?
We do not have preference Elo for both models, so we do not declare an overall winner. Compare the metrics that exist.
Which is better at coding, GLM-5.2 or Qwen: Qwen3.6 Max Preview?
SWE-bench is missing for at least one model, so we do not rank coding from a single number.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
GLM-5.2 output tokens are $3.74/1M versus $6.162/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, GLM-5.2 or Qwen: Qwen3.6 Max Preview?
We do not have TTFT for both models.
Which has the larger context window?
GLM-5.2 accepts 1M tokens versus 262k.
Can I self-host either model?
GLM-5.2 is marked open-weights in our catalog. The other side is a closed API. Check the provider license before you ship weights.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. GLM-5.2 and Qwen: Qwen3.6 Max Preview Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Related news

  • news · Aug 16, 2026

    GLM-5.2 vs GLM 5V Turbo Price and SWE-bench 2026

  • launch · Jun 18, 2026

    GLM-5.2 remains the prior Zhipu flagship for upgrade pairs

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All GLM-5.2 matchups →|All Qwen: Qwen3.6 Max Preview matchups →
GLM-5.2 vs Z.ai: GLM 5V Turbo (next glm)Qwen QwQ 32B vs GLM-5.2Qwen 3 Max vs GLM-5.2GLM-5.3 vs GLM-5.2Qwen 2.5 Plus vs GLM-5.2Qwen3 235B vs GLM-5.2