CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
Leaderboard
Models
Compare
Best of & Stacks
Research & News
…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

Theme:
Currency:
  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Grok 4

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 17, 2026noindex (thin pair)

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Grok 4 benchmark

In this head-to-head showdown, Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B is more budget-friendly at $0.34/1M per 1M output tokens. Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.

Executive Comparison Verdict

Bottom Line: Both Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B and Grok 4 present distinct architectural strengths. Compare the verified benchmark matrix below to choose the model tailored to your specific application requirements.
Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramXLinkedInReddit

Verified Head-to-Head Advantage Breakdown

3 direct benchmark disciplines evaluated across capability, speed, and cost

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B (3)Grok 4 (0)
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B
3 of 3 Wins
✓Input price✓Output price✓Context window
Grok 4
0 of 3 Wins
Competitive baseline across remaining benchmarks
Google
Leads 3 of 3 metrics
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B

Auto-discovered from OpenRouter (google/gemma-4-26b-a4b-it). Preview until a second source matches.

$0.33999999999999997/1M out
xAI
Grok 4

Previous xAI flagship.

Grok 4.0Elo 1,488$15/1M out
Top Rival Showdowns for Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B
All Matchups
Compare vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5vs GPT-5vs Grok 4.6vs DeepSeek V4 Provs Qwen 3 Max
Preference Leader

No shared data

Single model data

Throughput Leader

No shared data

No latency data

Value per Dollar LeaderGoogle: Gemma 4 26B A4B Wins

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B

$0.33999999999999997 / 1M output

Capability Percentiles

Relative percentile scores computed across all active models in the benchmark catalog.

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Leaders Matchup Capability Radar

Comparing top Western standard models with China's leading frontier rival across 6 skill dimensions. Tap any spoke or dot to inspect.

Tap any node to inspect
0–100 %ile
Head-to-Head Comparison

Overall Matchup Breakdown

Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B (3)vsGrok 4 (6)
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B : 3W (33%)Overall: Grok 4Grok 4: 6W (67%)
← Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B Grok 4 →
🏆Grok 4(4/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Benchmark
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B vsGrok 4
Preference Elo
—vs1,488
Coding Elo
—vs—
SWE-bench
—vs58.6%
LiveBench
—vs64.1%
GPQA Diamond
—vs79%
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B : 0WGrok 4: 4W
🏆Grok 4(2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Benchmark
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B vsGrok 4
Output speed
—vs98 tok/s
Time to first token
—vs230 ms
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B : 0WGrok 4: 2W
🏆Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B (3/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Benchmark
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B vsGrok 4
Output price
$0.34/1Mvs$15/1M+$14.66/1M
Input price
$0.07/1Mvs$3/1M+$2.93/1M
Context window
262kvs256k+6k
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B : 3WGrok 4: 0W

Side-by-Side Benchmark Matrix

Preference Elo
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B —
Grok 41,488
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
LiveBench
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B —
Grok 464.1%
livebench · Aug 17, 2026
SWE-bench
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B —
Grok 458.6%
swebench · Aug 17, 2026
GPQA Diamond
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B —
Grok 479%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Time to first token
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B —
Grok 4230 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Output speed
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B —
Grok 498 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Input price+$2.93/1M
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B $0.07/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
Grok 4$3/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Output price+$14.66/1M
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B $0.34/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
Grok 4$15/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Context window+6k
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B 262k
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
Grok 4256k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
BenchmarkGoogle: Gemma 4 26B A4B Grok 4Advantage Delta
Preference Elo—
1,488
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
—
LiveBench—
64.1%
livebench · Aug 17, 2026
—
SWE-bench—
58.6%
swebench · Aug 17, 2026
—
GPQA Diamond—
79%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
—
Time to first token—
230 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
—
Output speed—
98 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
—
Input price
$0.07/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
$3/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+$2.93/1M
Output price
$0.34/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
$15/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+$14.66/1M
Context window
262k
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
256k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+6k
Interactive Simulator (USD)

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).

Save up to 98% with Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B $7.55 / mo
In: $2.45Out: $5.1
Grok 4$330.00 / mo
In: $105Out: $225
Estimated Cost Delta

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B is estimated to save $322.45/month ($3,869/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B :Pick Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B when you are optimizing output cost.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsinsufficient data

Need SWE-bench on both sides.

High-volume chatGoogle: Gemma 4 26B A4B

Lower output list price ($0.34/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient data

Need TTFT on both sides.

Long-document RAGGoogle: Gemma 4 26B A4B

Larger window (262k).

Screenshots / visionGrok 4

Grok 4 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsinsufficient dataNeed SWE-bench on both sides.
High-volume chatGoogle: Gemma 4 26B A4B Lower output list price ($0.34/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient dataNeed TTFT on both sides.
Long-document RAGGoogle: Gemma 4 26B A4B Larger window (262k).
Screenshots / visionGrok 4Grok 4 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

View all news
launchJul 10, 2025

Grok 4 remains the previous xAI flagship on this catalog

2025-07 row. 4.6 is the buy. We keep 4 so upgrade pairs and old inbound links resolve.

Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Social Share Card Preview

Dynamic OpenGraph banner generated at /compare/gemma-4-26b-a4b-it-vs-grok-4/opengraph-image

Save PNG

CompareLLM AI Matrix

Verified Head-to-Head Telemetry

LIVE BENCHMARK
VS
Google

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B

Elo n/a
SWE-bench—
Speed (tok/s)262k
Input / 1M Tokens$0.07/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$0.34/1M
xAI

Grok 4

Elo 1,488
SWE-bench58.6%
Speed (tok/s)98 tok/s
Input / 1M Tokens$3/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$15/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B or Grok 4?
We do not have preference Elo for both models, so we do not declare an overall winner. Compare the metrics that exist.
Which is better at coding, Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B or Grok 4?
SWE-bench is missing for at least one model, so we do not rank coding from a single number.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B output tokens are $0.34/1M versus $15/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B or Grok 4?
We do not have TTFT for both models.
Which has the larger context window?
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B accepts 262k tokens versus 256k.
Can I self-host either model?
Neither model is marked open-weights here. You are comparing hosted APIs.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B and Grok 4 Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Related news

  • launch · Jul 10, 2025

    Grok 4 remains the previous xAI flagship on this catalog

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B matchups →|All Grok 4 matchups →
Grok 4 vs Grok 3 (previous grok)Grok 4 vs Grok 4.6 (next grok)Gemini 3 Pro vs Grok 4Gemini 3 Flash vs Grok 4Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking vs Grok 4Gemini 3.6 Pro vs Grok 4