CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
Explore
Compare
Decide
Track
Learn
…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

Theme:
Currency:
  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free) vs GLM-5.3

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 17, 2026noindex (thin pair)

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free) vs GLM-5.3 benchmark

In this head-to-head showdown, Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free) is more budget-friendly at $0/1M per 1M output tokens. Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.

Executive Comparison Verdict

Bottom Line: Both Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free) and GLM-5.3 present distinct architectural strengths. Compare the verified benchmark matrix below to choose the model tailored to your specific application requirements.
Share Analysis:Share:
WhatsAppTelegramXLinkedIn
Executive Verdict Summary

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free) holds empirical advantage (3 of 3 metrics)

Coding / SWESWE-bench
GLM-5.3Top code solve rate
ReasoningGPQA / Live
GLM-5.3Top logical accuracy
Best Value$/1M Tok
GLM-5.3Lowest API billing cost
Speed / TokTok/Sec
GLM-5.3Fastest stream rate

Verified Advantage Breakdown

3 benchmarks evaluated across capability, speed, and cost

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free) (3)GLM-5.3 (0)
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free)
3 of 3 Wins
✓Input price✓Output price✓Context window
GLM-5.3
0 of 3 Wins
Competitive baseline across remaining benchmarks
Google
Leads 3 of 3
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free)

Auto-discovered from OpenRouter (google/gemma-4-26b-a4b-it:free). Preview until a second source matches.

In: $0 · Out: $0/1M
Zhipu
GLM-5.3

Z.ai Aug 14 2026 post-train of the GLM-5.2 744B base. Coding-plan live; open weights promised after a two-week safety review (z.ai/blog/glm-5.3).

Elo 1,558In: $0.5 · Out: $1.8/1M
Top Rival Showdowns for Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free)
All Matchups
Compare vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5vs GPT-5vs Grok 4.6vs DeepSeek V4 Provs Qwen 3 Max
Preference Leader

No shared data

Single model data

Throughput Leader

No shared data

No latency data

Value per Dollar LeaderGoogle: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free) Wins

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free)

$0 / 1M output

Capability Percentiles

Relative percentile scores computed across all active models in the benchmark catalog.

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Leaders Matchup Capability Radar

Comparing top standard models across 6 key capability dimensions. Tap any spoke or dot to inspect.

Tap any node to inspect
0–100 %ile

Overall Matchup Breakdown

Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free) (3)vsGLM-5.3 (7)
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free): 3W (30%)Overall: GLM-5.3GLM-5.3: 7W (70%)
← Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free)GLM-5.3 →
🏆GLM-5.3 Leads(5/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Benchmark
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free)vsGLM-5.3
Preference Elo
—vs1,558
Coding Elo
—vs1,586
SWE-bench
—vs76.4%
LiveBench
—vs70.8%
GPQA Diamond
—vs83.2%
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free): 0WGLM-5.3: 5W
🏆GLM-5.3 Leads(2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Benchmark
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free)vsGLM-5.3
Output speed
—vs90 tok/s
Time to first token
—vs255 ms
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free): 0WGLM-5.3: 2W
🏆Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free) Leads(3/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Benchmark
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free)vsGLM-5.3
Output price
$0/1Mvs$1.8/1M+$1.8/1M
Input price
$0/1Mvs$0.5/1M+$0.5/1M
Context window
262kvs200k+62k
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free): 3WGLM-5.3: 0W

Side-by-Side Benchmark Matrix

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free)GLM-5.3
Preference Elo
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free)—
GLM-5.31,558
Coding Elo
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free)—
GLM-5.31,586
LiveBench
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free)—
GLM-5.370.8%
SWE-bench
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free)—
GLM-5.376.4%
GPQA Diamond
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free)—
GLM-5.383.2%
Time to first token
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free)—
GLM-5.3255 ms
Output speed
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free)—
GLM-5.390 tok/s
Input priceGoogle: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free) +$0.5/1M
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free)$0/1M
GLM-5.3$0.5/1M
Output priceGoogle: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free) +$1.8/1M
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free)$0/1M
GLM-5.3$1.8/1M
Context windowGoogle: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free) +62k
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free)262k
GLM-5.3200k
BenchmarkGoogle: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free)GLM-5.3Advantage Delta
Preference Elo—
1,558
lmarena · Aug 16, 2026
—
Coding Elo—
1,586
lmarena · Aug 16, 2026
—
LiveBench—
70.8%
livebench · Aug 16, 2026
—
SWE-bench—
76.4%
swebench · Aug 16, 2026
—
GPQA Diamond—
83.2%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
—
Time to first token—
255 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
—
Output speed—
90 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
—
Input price
$0/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
$0.5/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
+$0.5/1M
Output price
$0/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
$1.8/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
+$1.8/1M
Context window
262k
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
200k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
+62k

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free):Pick Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free) when you are optimizing output cost.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsinsufficient data

Need SWE-bench on both sides.

High-volume chatGoogle: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free)

Lower output list price ($0/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient data

Need TTFT on both sides.

Long-document RAGGoogle: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free)

Larger window (262k).

Screenshots / visionGLM-5.3

GLM-5.3 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsinsufficient dataNeed SWE-bench on both sides.
High-volume chatGoogle: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free)Lower output list price ($0/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient dataNeed TTFT on both sides.
Long-document RAGGoogle: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free)Larger window (262k).
Screenshots / visionGLM-5.3GLM-5.3 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

View all news
launchAug 14, 2026

GLM-5.3 (Aug 14): Z.ai post-train of the 5.2 744B base

Coding-plan live; open weights promised after a two-week safety review. Newest Zhipu row.

launchJun 18, 2026

GLM-5.2 remains the prior Zhipu flagship for upgrade pairs

Strong Chinese/English coding. 5.3 is the new row; 5.2 stays so the delta is visible.

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Social Share Card Preview

Dynamic OpenGraph banner generated at /compare/gemma-4-26b-a4b-it-free-vs-glm-5-3/opengraph-image

Save PNG

CompareLLM AI Matrix

Verified Head-to-Head Telemetry

LIVE BENCHMARK
VS
Google

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free)

Elo n/a
SWE-bench—
Speed (tok/s)262k
Input / 1M Tokens$0/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$0/1M
Zhipu

GLM-5.3

Elo 1,558
SWE-bench76.4%
Speed (tok/s)90 tok/s
Input / 1M Tokens$0.5/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$1.8/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free) or GLM-5.3?
We do not have preference Elo for both models, so we do not declare an overall winner. Compare the metrics that exist.
Which is better at coding, Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free) or GLM-5.3?
SWE-bench is missing for at least one model, so we do not rank coding from a single number.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free) output tokens are $0/1M versus $1.8/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free) or GLM-5.3?
We do not have TTFT for both models.
Which has the larger context window?
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free) accepts 262k tokens versus 200k.
Can I self-host either model?
Neither model is marked open-weights here. You are comparing hosted APIs.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free) and GLM-5.3 Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Related news

  • launch · Aug 14, 2026

    GLM-5.3 (Aug 14): Z.ai post-train of the 5.2 744B base

  • launch · Jun 18, 2026

    GLM-5.2 remains the prior Zhipu flagship for upgrade pairs

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free) matchups →|All GLM-5.3 matchups →
GLM-5.3 vs Z.ai: GLM 5V Turbo (previous glm)Gemini 3 Pro vs GLM-5.3Gemini 3 Flash vs GLM-5.3Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking vs GLM-5.3Gemini 3.6 Pro vs GLM-5.3Gemini 3.6 Flash vs GLM-5.3