Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 17, 2026
In this head-to-head showdown, Gemini 3.7 Flash delivers higher overall intelligence and human-preferred responses (Elo 1,530 vs 1,492), while Gemini 3.7 Flash leads in SWE-bench software engineering benchmarks (72.4%), while Gemini 3.7 Flash is more budget-friendly at $1.875/1M per 1M output tokens. Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.
9 direct benchmark disciplines evaluated across capability, speed, and cost
Google Aug 13 2026 workhorse. Official intro price $0.75/$3.75 per 1M through Dec 31 2026; 1,048,576-token context (Google blog).
Currently comparing Gemini 3.7 Flash vs GLM-5.2. Alternative family tiers available.
Δ 38 Arena Elo pts
215 tok/s
$1.875 / 1M output
Relative percentile scores computed across all active models in the benchmark catalog.
Comparing top Western standard models with China's leading frontier rival across 6 skill dimensions. Tap any spoke or dot to inspect.
Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.
Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy
Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness
Cost per million tokens and max context window length
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.7 Flash | GLM-5.2 | Advantage Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| Preference Elo | +38 | ||
| Coding Elo | +42 | ||
| LiveBench | +4.4% | ||
| SWE-bench | +3.1% | ||
| GPQA Diamond | +1.7% | ||
| Time to first token | +188 ms | ||
| Output speed | 215 tok/s | 84 tok/s | +131 tok/s |
| Input price | $0.375/1M | $1.19/1M | +$0.815/1M |
| Output price | $1.875/1M | $3.74/1M | +$1.865/1M |
| Context window | — |
Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).
Gemini 3.7 Flash is estimated to save $56.50/month ($678/year).
Higher SWE-bench (72.4%).
Lower output list price ($1.875/1M).
Lower TTFT (82 ms).
Larger window (1M).
Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (Gemini 3.7 Flash).
| Target Workload | Recommended Pick | Evaluation Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Repo / coding agents | Gemini 3.7 Flash | Higher SWE-bench (72.4%). |
| High-volume chat | Gemini 3.7 Flash | Lower output list price ($1.875/1M). |
| Voice / low-latency UI | Gemini 3.7 Flash | Lower TTFT (82 ms). |
| Long-document RAG | Gemini 3.7 Flash | Larger window (1M). |
| Screenshots / vision | Gemini 3.7 Flash | Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (Gemini 3.7 Flash). |
GLM-5.2 undercuts GLM 5V Turbo by 74.2% on input at $0.31/1M, with 1,492 Elo and 69.3% SWE-bench in dated 2026 snapshots.
3.7 Flash vs 3.6 Pro is the current Google volume-versus-upgrade pair.
Jul 21 workhorse that inherited $0.75/$3.75 through year-end. Keep the row; 3.7 is the newer sibling.
Google’s current workhorse drop. Official intro list and 1,048,576-token context. Compare to Luna and Haiku.
No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!
Dynamic OpenGraph banner generated at /compare/gemini-3-7-flash-vs-glm-5-2/opengraph-image
Verified Head-to-Head Telemetry
news · Aug 16, 2026
GLM-5.2 vs GLM 5V Turbo Price and SWE-bench 2026
compare · Aug 13, 2026
Gemini Flash vs Pro: when Flash is the whole product
price · Aug 13, 2026
Gemini 3.6 Flash (Jul 21) now shares the 3.7 intro rate
launch · Aug 13, 2026
Gemini 3.7 Flash (Aug 13): $0.75/$3.75 intro through Dec 31 2026