Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 17, 2026
In this head-to-head showdown, Gemini 3 Flash delivers higher overall intelligence and human-preferred responses (Elo 1,495 vs 1,492), while Gemini 3 Flash leads in SWE-bench software engineering benchmarks (75.8%), while Gemini 3 Flash is more budget-friendly at $3/1M per 1M output tokens. Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.
9 direct benchmark disciplines evaluated across capability, speed, and cost
Fast Google frontier-adjacent model. Near-top official SWE-bench at a fraction of Opus price.
Zhipu flagship. Strong Chinese/English coding and agents.
Currently comparing Gemini 3 Flash vs GLM-5.2. Alternative family tiers available.
Δ 3 Arena Elo pts
190 tok/s
$3 / 1M output
Relative percentile scores computed across all active models in the benchmark catalog.
Comparing top Western standard models with China's leading frontier rival across 6 skill dimensions. Tap any spoke or dot to inspect.
Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.
Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy
Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness
Cost per million tokens and max context window length
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Flash | GLM-5.2 | Advantage Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| Preference Elo | +3 | ||
| Coding Elo | +6 | ||
| LiveBench | +1.6% | ||
| SWE-bench | +6.5% | ||
| GPQA Diamond | +1.1% | ||
| Time to first token | +175 ms | ||
| Output speed | 190 tok/s | 84 tok/s | +106 tok/s |
| Input price | $0.5/1M | $1.19/1M | +$0.69/1M |
| Output price | $3.74/1M | +$0.74/1M | |
| Context window | — |
Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).
Gemini 3 Flash is estimated to save $35.25/month ($423/year).
Higher SWE-bench (75.8%).
Lower output list price ($3/1M).
Lower TTFT (95 ms).
Larger window (1M).
Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (Gemini 3 Flash).
| Target Workload | Recommended Pick | Evaluation Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Repo / coding agents | Gemini 3 Flash | Higher SWE-bench (75.8%). |
| High-volume chat | Gemini 3 Flash | Lower output list price ($3/1M). |
| Voice / low-latency UI | Gemini 3 Flash | Lower TTFT (95 ms). |
| Long-document RAG | Gemini 3 Flash | Larger window (1M). |
| Screenshots / vision | Gemini 3 Flash | Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (Gemini 3 Flash). |
GLM-5.2 undercuts GLM 5V Turbo by 74.2% on input at $0.31/1M, with 1,492 Elo and 69.3% SWE-bench in dated 2026 snapshots.
Strong Chinese/English coding. 5.3 is the new row; 5.2 stays so the delta is visible.
March 2026 speed SKU. Still a useful cheap-coding compare even after 3.6/3.7 Flash.
No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!
Dynamic OpenGraph banner generated at /compare/gemini-3-flash-vs-glm-5-2/opengraph-image
Verified Head-to-Head Telemetry