CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
Explore
Compare
Decide
Track
Learn
…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

Theme:
Currency:
  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. Google: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) vs OpenAI o1-mini

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 17, 2026noindex (thin pair)

Google: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) vs OpenAI o1-mini benchmark

In this head-to-head showdown, Google: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) is more budget-friendly at $1.5/1M per 1M output tokens. Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.

Executive Comparison Verdict

Bottom Line: Both Google: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) and OpenAI o1-mini present distinct architectural strengths. Compare the verified benchmark matrix below to choose the model tailored to your specific application requirements.
Share Analysis:Share:
WhatsAppTelegramXLinkedIn
Executive Verdict Summary

Google: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) holds empirical advantage (2 of 3 metrics)

Coding / SWESWE-bench
OpenAI o1-miniTop code solve rate
ReasoningGPQA / Live
OpenAI o1-miniTop logical accuracy
Best Value$/1M Tok
Google: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)Lowest API billing cost
Speed / TokTok/Sec
OpenAI o1-miniFastest stream rate

Verified Advantage Breakdown

3 benchmarks evaluated across capability, speed, and cost

Google: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) (2)OpenAI o1-mini (1)
Google: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)
2 of 3 Wins
✓Input price✓Output price
OpenAI o1-mini
1 of 3 Wins
✓Context window
Google
Leads 2 of 3
Google: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)

Auto-discovered from OpenRouter (google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-image). Preview until a second source matches.

In: $0.25 · Out: $1.5/1M
OpenAI
Leads 1 of 3
OpenAI o1-mini

OpenAI high-speed, cost-effective reasoning model optimized for STEM, math, and code generation.

Elo 1,445In: $1.1 · Out: $4.4/1M
Top Rival Showdowns for Google: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)
All Matchups
Compare vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5vs GPT-5vs Grok 4.6vs DeepSeek V4 Provs Qwen 3 Max
Preference Leader

No shared data

Single model data

Throughput Leader

No shared data

No latency data

Value per Dollar LeaderGoogle: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) Wins

Google: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)

$1.5 / 1M output

Capability Percentiles

Relative percentile scores computed across all active models in the benchmark catalog.

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Leaders Matchup Capability Radar

Comparing top standard models across 6 key capability dimensions. Tap any spoke or dot to inspect.

Tap any node to inspect
0–100 %ile

Overall Matchup Breakdown

Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.

Google: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) (2)vsOpenAI o1-mini (8)
Google: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image): 2W (20%)Overall: OpenAI o1-miniOpenAI o1-mini: 8W (80%)
← Google: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)OpenAI o1-mini →
🏆OpenAI o1-mini Leads(5/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Benchmark
Google: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)vsOpenAI o1-mini
Preference Elo
—vs1,445
Coding Elo
—vs1,468
SWE-bench
—vs56.4%
LiveBench
—vs62%
GPQA Diamond
—vs76.8%
Google: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image): 0WOpenAI o1-mini: 5W
🏆OpenAI o1-mini Leads(2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Benchmark
Google: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)vsOpenAI o1-mini
Output speed
—vs85 tok/s
Time to first token
—vs280 ms
Google: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image): 0WOpenAI o1-mini: 2W
🏆Google: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) Leads(2/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Benchmark
Google: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)vsOpenAI o1-mini
Output price
$1.5/1Mvs$4.4/1M+$2.9/1M
Input price
$0.25/1Mvs$1.1/1M+$0.85/1M
Context window
66kvs128k+62k
Google: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image): 2WOpenAI o1-mini: 1W

Side-by-Side Benchmark Matrix

Google: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)OpenAI o1-mini
Preference Elo
Google: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)—
OpenAI o1-mini1,445
Coding Elo
Google: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)—
OpenAI o1-mini1,468
LiveBench
Google: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)—
OpenAI o1-mini62%
SWE-bench
Google: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)—
OpenAI o1-mini56.4%
GPQA Diamond
Google: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)—
OpenAI o1-mini76.8%
Time to first token
Google: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)—
OpenAI o1-mini280 ms
Output speed
Google: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)—
OpenAI o1-mini85 tok/s
Input priceGoogle: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) +$0.85/1M
Google: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)$0.25/1M
OpenAI o1-mini$1.1/1M
Output priceGoogle: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) +$2.9/1M
Google: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)$1.5/1M
OpenAI o1-mini$4.4/1M
Context windowOpenAI o1-mini +62k
Google: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)66k
OpenAI o1-mini128k
BenchmarkGoogle: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)OpenAI o1-miniAdvantage Delta
Preference Elo—
1,445
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
—
Coding Elo—
1,468
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
—
LiveBench—
62%
livebench · Aug 17, 2026
—
SWE-bench—
56.4%
swebench · Aug 17, 2026
—
GPQA Diamond—
76.8%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
—
Time to first token—
280 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
—
Output speed—
85 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
—
Input price
$0.25/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
$1.1/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+$0.85/1M
Output price
$1.5/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
$4.4/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+$2.9/1M
Context window
66k
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
128k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+62k

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).

Save 70% with Google: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
Google: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)$31.25 / mo
In: $8.75Out: $22.5
OpenAI o1-mini$104.50 / mo
In: $38.5Out: $66
Estimated Cost Delta

Google: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) is estimated to save $73.25/month ($879/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    Google: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image):Pick Google: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) when you are optimizing output cost.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsinsufficient data

Need SWE-bench on both sides.

High-volume chatGoogle: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)

Lower output list price ($1.5/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient data

Need TTFT on both sides.

Long-document RAGOpenAI o1-mini

Larger window (128k).

Screenshots / visionOpenAI o1-mini

OpenAI o1-mini is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsinsufficient dataNeed SWE-bench on both sides.
High-volume chatGoogle: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)Lower output list price ($1.5/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient dataNeed TTFT on both sides.
Long-document RAGOpenAI o1-miniLarger window (128k).
Screenshots / visionOpenAI o1-miniOpenAI o1-mini is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Social Share Card Preview

Dynamic OpenGraph banner generated at /compare/gemini-3-1-flash-lite-image-vs-o1-mini/opengraph-image

Save PNG

CompareLLM AI Matrix

Verified Head-to-Head Telemetry

LIVE BENCHMARK
VS
Google

Google: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)

Elo n/a
SWE-bench—
Speed (tok/s)66k
Input / 1M Tokens$0.25/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$1.5/1M
OpenAI

OpenAI o1-mini

Elo 1,445
SWE-bench56.4%
Speed (tok/s)85 tok/s
Input / 1M Tokens$1.1/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$4.4/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Google: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) or OpenAI o1-mini?
We do not have preference Elo for both models, so we do not declare an overall winner. Compare the metrics that exist.
Which is better at coding, Google: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) or OpenAI o1-mini?
SWE-bench is missing for at least one model, so we do not rank coding from a single number.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
Google: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) output tokens are $1.5/1M versus $4.4/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, Google: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) or OpenAI o1-mini?
We do not have TTFT for both models.
Which has the larger context window?
OpenAI o1-mini accepts 128k tokens versus 66k.
Can I self-host either model?
Neither model is marked open-weights here. You are comparing hosted APIs.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Google: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) and OpenAI o1-mini Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All Google: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) matchups →|All OpenAI o1-mini matchups →
OpenAI o1-mini vs GPT-4o mini (previous gpt-mini)OpenAI o1-mini vs OpenAI: o3 Mini (next gpt-mini)GPT-5 vs OpenAI o1-miniGemini 3 Pro vs OpenAI o1-miniGemini 3 Flash vs OpenAI o1-miniGPT-4.5 Orion vs OpenAI o1-mini