Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 1, 2026

FLUX.1 [schnell] vs Reve 2.1 benchmark

Name: FLUX.1 [schnell] vs Reve 2.1 AI benchmark comparison
Creator: CompareLLM
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Comparing verified benchmark accuracy, speed, and token pricing between FLUX.1 [schnell] and Reve 2.1. Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.

Share Analysis:

Verified Head-to-Head Advantage Breakdown

5 direct benchmark disciplines evaluated across capability, speed, and cost

FLUX.1 [schnell] (2)Reve 2.1 (3)

FLUX.1 [schnell]

2 of 5 Wins

✓Generation time✓Price per 1k images

Reve 2.1

3 of 5 Wins

✓Image Elo✓Prompt adherence✓Text rendering

Black Forest Labs

Leads 2 of 5 metrics

FLUX.1 [schnell]

Apache 2.0 4-step distilled open weights model optimized for local inference and instant preview generation.

Schnell 4-StepImg Elo 1,142$15/1k imgs

Reve

Leads 3 of 5 metrics

Reve 2.1

State-of-the-art cinematic image synthesis foundation model known for photorealistic lighting and aesthetic composition.

Img Elo 1,325$200/1k imgs

FLUX.1 Series Lineage & Sibling Variants

3 models

Currently comparing FLUX.1 [schnell] vs Reve 2.1. Alternative family tiers available.

Active: FLUX.1 [schnell]

FLUX.1.1 [pro]$50/1k FLUX.1 [dev]$30/1k

Top Rival Showdowns for FLUX.1 [schnell]

All Matchups

Compare vs:vs GPT Image 2 (High)vs Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image)vs Ideogram 4.0 (Quality)vs Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro vs Krea 2 Large

Image Quality LeaderReve 2.1 Wins

Reve 2.1

Δ 183 Image Elo pts

Generation Speed LeaderFLUX.1 [schnell] Wins

FLUX.1 [schnell]

1.2s per render

Value per Dollar LeaderFLUX.1 [schnell] Wins

FLUX.1 [schnell]

$15/1k images

Head-to-Head Comparison

Overall Matchup Breakdown

Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.

FLUX.1 [schnell] (2)vsReve 2.1 (3)

FLUX.1 [schnell]: 2W (40%)Overall: Reve 2.1Reve 2.1: 3W (60%)

← FLUX.1 [schnell]Reve 2.1 →

🏆Reve 2.1(3/3)

Visual Quality & Adherence

Arena Preference Elo, prompt fidelity & typography score

Benchmark

FLUX.1 [schnell]vsReve 2.1

Image Elo

1,142vs1,325+183

Prompt adherence

84%vs93%+9%

Text rendering

82%vs93.5%+11.5%

FLUX.1 [schnell]: 0WReve 2.1: 3W

🏆FLUX.1 [schnell](1/1)

Generation Latency

Time to render full-resolution image snapshot (seconds)

Benchmark

FLUX.1 [schnell]vsReve 2.1

Generation time

1.2svs4.5s+3.3s

FLUX.1 [schnell]: 1WReve 2.1: 0W

🏆FLUX.1 [schnell](1/1)

Cost Efficiency

API inference cost per 1,000 generated images

Benchmark

FLUX.1 [schnell]vsReve 2.1

Price per 1k images

$15/1kvs$200/1k+$185/1k

FLUX.1 [schnell]: 1WReve 2.1: 0W

Side-by-Side Benchmark Matrix

Image Elo+183

FLUX.1 [schnell]1,142

seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026

Reve 2.11,325

seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026

Generation time+3.3s

FLUX.1 [schnell]1.2s

seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026

Reve 2.14.5s

seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026

Price per 1k images+$185/1k

FLUX.1 [schnell]$15/1k

seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026

Reve 2.1$200/1k

seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026

Prompt adherence+9%

FLUX.1 [schnell]84%

seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026

Reve 2.193%

seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026

Text rendering+11.5%

FLUX.1 [schnell]82%

seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026

Reve 2.193.5%

seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026

Benchmark	FLUX.1 [schnell]	Reve 2.1	Advantage Delta
Image Elo	1,142 seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026	1,325 seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026	+183
Generation time	1.2s seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026	4.5s seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026	+3.3s
Price per 1k images	$15/1k seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026	$200/1k seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026	+$185/1k
Prompt adherence	84% seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026	93% seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026	+9%
Text rendering	82% seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026	93.5% seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026	+11.5%

Interactive Simulator (USD)

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).

Save up to 93% with FLUX.1 [schnell]

Monthly Image Production Volume25k images / month (25000 imgs)

Quick Presets:

FLUX.1 [schnell]$375.00 / mo

Rate: $15/1k

Reve 2.1$5,000.00 / mo

Rate: $200/1k

Estimated Cost Delta

FLUX.1 [schnell] is estimated to save $4,625.00/month ($55,500/year).

Based on 25k images generated

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsinsufficient data

Need SWE-bench on both sides.

High-volume chatinsufficient data

Need list prices.

Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient data

Need TTFT on both sides.

Long-document RAGinsufficient data

Need context sizes.

Screenshots / visioninsufficient data

Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (undefined).

Target Workload	Recommended Pick	Evaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agents	insufficient data	Need SWE-bench on both sides.
High-volume chat	insufficient data	Need list prices.
Voice / low-latency UI	insufficient data	Need TTFT on both sides.
Long-document RAG	insufficient data	Need context sizes.
Screenshots / vision	insufficient data	Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (undefined).

Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Social Share Card Preview

Dynamic OpenGraph banner generated at /compare/flux-1-schnell-vs-reve-2-1/opengraph-image

Save PNG

CompareLLM AI Matrix

Verified Head-to-Head Telemetry

LIVE BENCHMARK

Black Forest Labs

FLUX.1 [schnell]

Elo n/a

SWE-bench—

Speed (tok/s)—

Input / 1M Tokens$15/1k

Output / 1M Tokens$15/1k

Reve

Reve 2.1

Elo n/a

SWE-bench—

Speed (tok/s)—

Input / 1M Tokens$200/1k

Output / 1M Tokens$200/1k

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, FLUX.1 [schnell] or Reve 2.1?: We do not have preference Elo for both models, so we do not declare an overall winner. Compare the metrics that exist.
Which is better at coding, FLUX.1 [schnell] or Reve 2.1?: SWE-bench is missing for at least one model, so we do not rank coding from a single number.
Which is cheaper to run in production?: List prices are missing for at least one model.
Which is faster, FLUX.1 [schnell] or Reve 2.1?: We do not have TTFT for both models.
Which has the larger context window?: Context window is missing for at least one model.
Can I self-host either model?: FLUX.1 [schnell] is marked open-weights in our catalog. The other side is a closed API. Check the provider license before you ship weights.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?: No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?: Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. FLUX.1 [schnell] and Reve 2.1 Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All FLUX.1 [schnell] matchups →|All Reve 2.1 matchups →

FLUX.1 [schnell] vs FLUX.1 [dev] (previous flux)FLUX.1 [schnell] vs FLUX.1.1 [pro] (next flux)FLUX.2 [max] vs Reve 2.1 FLUX.2 [flex] vs Reve 2.1 FLUX.1.1 [pro] vs Reve 2.1 FLUX.1 [dev] vs Reve 2.1

Benchmark

FLUX.1 [schnell]

Reve 2.1

Advantage Delta

Image Elo

1,142

seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026

1,325

seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026

+183

Generation time

1.2s

seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026

4.5s

seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026

+3.3s

Price per 1k images

$15/1k

seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026

$200/1k

seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026

+$185/1k

Prompt adherence

84%

seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026

93%

seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026

+9%

Text rendering

82%

seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026

93.5%

seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026

+11.5%

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsinsufficient data

Need SWE-bench on both sides.

High-volume chatinsufficient data

Need list prices.

Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient data

Need TTFT on both sides.

Long-document RAGinsufficient data

Need context sizes.

Screenshots / visioninsufficient data

Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (undefined).

Target Workload	Recommended Pick	Evaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agents	insufficient data	Need SWE-bench on both sides.
High-volume chat	insufficient data	Need list prices.
Voice / low-latency UI	insufficient data	Need TTFT on both sides.
Long-document RAG	insufficient data	Need context sizes.
Screenshots / vision	insufficient data	Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (undefined).

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, FLUX.1 [schnell] or Reve 2.1?

We do not have preference Elo for both models, so we do not declare an overall winner. Compare the metrics that exist.

Which is better at coding, FLUX.1 [schnell] or Reve 2.1?

SWE-bench is missing for at least one model, so we do not rank coding from a single number.

Which is cheaper to run in production?

List prices are missing for at least one model.

Which is faster, FLUX.1 [schnell] or Reve 2.1?

We do not have TTFT for both models.

Which has the larger context window?

Context window is missing for at least one model.

Can I self-host either model?

FLUX.1 [schnell] is marked open-weights in our catalog. The other side is a closed API. Check the provider license before you ship weights.

Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?

No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.

What does preference Elo mean on this page?

Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. FLUX.1 [schnell] and Reve 2.1 Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.