Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 17, 2026noindex (thin pair)

FLUX.1 [schnell] vs Qwen: Qwen Plus 0728 benchmark

Name: FLUX.1 [schnell] vs Qwen: Qwen Plus 0728 AI benchmark comparison
Creator: CompareLLM
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Comparing verified benchmark accuracy, speed, and token pricing between FLUX.1 [schnell] and Qwen: Qwen Plus 0728. Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.

Share Analysis:

Black Forest Labs

FLUX.1 [schnell]

Apache 2.0 4-step distilled open weights model optimized for local inference and instant preview generation.

Schnell 4-StepImg Elo 1,142$15/1k imgs

Alibaba

Qwen: Qwen Plus 0728

Auto-discovered from OpenRouter (qwen/qwen-plus-2025-07-28). Preview until a second source matches.

FLUX.1 Series Lineage & Sibling Variants

3 models

Currently comparing FLUX.1 [schnell] vs Qwen: Qwen Plus 0728. Alternative family tiers available.

Active: FLUX.1 [schnell]

FLUX.1.1 [pro]$50/1k FLUX.1 [dev]$30/1k

Top Rival Showdowns for FLUX.1 [schnell]

All Matchups

Compare vs:vs GPT Image 2 (High)vs Reve 2.1 vs Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image)vs Ideogram 4.0 (Quality)vs Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro

Image Quality Leader

No shared data

Single model data

Generation Speed Leader

No shared data

No latency data

Value per Dollar Leader

No shared data

Unpriced

Head-to-Head Comparison

Overall Matchup Breakdown

Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.

FLUX.1 [schnell] (5)vsQwen: Qwen Plus 0728 (0)

FLUX.1 [schnell]: 5W (100%)Overall: FLUX.1 [schnell]Qwen: Qwen Plus 0728: 0W (0%)

← FLUX.1 [schnell]Qwen: Qwen Plus 0728 →

🏆FLUX.1 [schnell](3/3)

Visual Quality & Adherence

Arena Preference Elo, prompt fidelity & typography score

Benchmark

FLUX.1 [schnell]vsQwen: Qwen Plus 0728

Image Elo

1,142vs—

Prompt adherence

84%vs—

Text rendering

82%vs—

FLUX.1 [schnell]: 3WQwen: Qwen Plus 0728: 0W

🏆FLUX.1 [schnell](1/1)

Generation Latency

Time to render full-resolution image snapshot (seconds)

Benchmark

FLUX.1 [schnell]vsQwen: Qwen Plus 0728

Generation time

1.2svs—

FLUX.1 [schnell]: 1WQwen: Qwen Plus 0728: 0W

🏆FLUX.1 [schnell](1/1)

Cost Efficiency

API inference cost per 1,000 generated images

Benchmark

FLUX.1 [schnell]vsQwen: Qwen Plus 0728

Price per 1k images

$15/1kvs—

FLUX.1 [schnell]: 1WQwen: Qwen Plus 0728: 0W

Side-by-Side Benchmark Matrix

Image Elo

FLUX.1 [schnell]1,142

seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026

Qwen: Qwen Plus 0728—

Generation time

FLUX.1 [schnell]1.2s

seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026

Qwen: Qwen Plus 0728—

Price per 1k images

FLUX.1 [schnell]$15/1k

seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026

Qwen: Qwen Plus 0728—

Prompt adherence

FLUX.1 [schnell]84%

seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026

Qwen: Qwen Plus 0728—

Text rendering

FLUX.1 [schnell]82%

seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026

Qwen: Qwen Plus 0728—

Benchmark	FLUX.1 [schnell]	Qwen: Qwen Plus 0728	Advantage Delta
Image Elo	1,142 seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026	—	—
Generation time	1.2s seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026	—	—
Price per 1k images	$15/1k seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026	—	—
Prompt adherence	84% seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026	—	—
Text rendering	82% seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026	—	—

Interactive Simulator (USD)

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).

Save up to 100% with Qwen: Qwen Plus 0728

Monthly Image Production Volume25k images / month (25000 imgs)

Quick Presets:

FLUX.1 [schnell]$375.00 / mo

Rate: $15/1k

Qwen: Qwen Plus 0728$0.00 / mo

Rate: $0/1k

Estimated Cost Delta

Qwen: Qwen Plus 0728 is estimated to save $375.00/month ($4,500/year).

Based on 25k images generated

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsinsufficient data

Need SWE-bench on both sides.

High-volume chatinsufficient data

Need list prices.

Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient data

Need TTFT on both sides.

Long-document RAGinsufficient data

Need context sizes.

Screenshots / visionFLUX.1 [schnell]

FLUX.1 [schnell] is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target Workload	Recommended Pick	Evaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agents	insufficient data	Need SWE-bench on both sides.
High-volume chat	insufficient data	Need list prices.
Voice / low-latency UI	insufficient data	Need TTFT on both sides.
Long-document RAG	insufficient data	Need context sizes.
Screenshots / vision	FLUX.1 [schnell]	FLUX.1 [schnell] is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Social Share Card Preview

Dynamic OpenGraph banner generated at /compare/flux-1-schnell-vs-qwen-plus-2025-07-28/opengraph-image

Save PNG

CompareLLM AI Matrix

Verified Head-to-Head Telemetry

LIVE BENCHMARK

Black Forest Labs

FLUX.1 [schnell]

Elo n/a

SWE-bench—

Speed (tok/s)—

Input / 1M Tokens$15/1k

Output / 1M Tokens$15/1k

Alibaba

Qwen: Qwen Plus 0728

Elo n/a

SWE-bench—

Speed (tok/s)1M

Input / 1M Tokens$0.26/1M

Output / 1M Tokens$0.78/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, FLUX.1 [schnell] or Qwen: Qwen Plus 0728?: We do not have preference Elo for both models, so we do not declare an overall winner. Compare the metrics that exist.
Which is better at coding, FLUX.1 [schnell] or Qwen: Qwen Plus 0728?: SWE-bench is missing for at least one model, so we do not rank coding from a single number.
Which is cheaper to run in production?: List prices are missing for at least one model.
Which is faster, FLUX.1 [schnell] or Qwen: Qwen Plus 0728?: We do not have TTFT for both models.
Which has the larger context window?: Context window is missing for at least one model.
Can I self-host either model?: FLUX.1 [schnell] is marked open-weights in our catalog. The other side is a closed API. Check the provider license before you ship weights.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?: No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?: Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. FLUX.1 [schnell] and Qwen: Qwen Plus 0728 Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All FLUX.1 [schnell] matchups →|All Qwen: Qwen Plus 0728 matchups →

FLUX.1 [schnell] vs FLUX.1 [dev] (previous flux)FLUX.1 [schnell] vs FLUX.1.1 [pro] (next flux)

Side-by-Side Benchmark Matrix

Image Elo

FLUX.1 [schnell]1,142

seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026

Qwen: Qwen Plus 0728—

Generation time

FLUX.1 [schnell]1.2s

seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026

Qwen: Qwen Plus 0728—

Price per 1k images

FLUX.1 [schnell]$15/1k

seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026

Qwen: Qwen Plus 0728—

Prompt adherence

FLUX.1 [schnell]84%

seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026

Qwen: Qwen Plus 0728—

Text rendering

FLUX.1 [schnell]82%

seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026

Qwen: Qwen Plus 0728—

Benchmark

FLUX.1 [schnell]

Qwen: Qwen Plus 0728

Advantage Delta

Image Elo

1,142

seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026

—

Generation time

1.2s

seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026

—

Price per 1k images

$15/1k

seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026

—

Prompt adherence

84%

seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026

—

Text rendering

82%

seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026

—

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsinsufficient data

Need SWE-bench on both sides.

High-volume chatinsufficient data

Need list prices.

Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient data

Need TTFT on both sides.

Long-document RAGinsufficient data

Need context sizes.

Screenshots / visionFLUX.1 [schnell]

FLUX.1 [schnell] is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target Workload	Recommended Pick	Evaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agents	insufficient data	Need SWE-bench on both sides.
High-volume chat	insufficient data	Need list prices.
Voice / low-latency UI	insufficient data	Need TTFT on both sides.
Long-document RAG	insufficient data	Need context sizes.
Screenshots / vision	FLUX.1 [schnell]	FLUX.1 [schnell] is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, FLUX.1 [schnell] or Qwen: Qwen Plus 0728?

We do not have preference Elo for both models, so we do not declare an overall winner. Compare the metrics that exist.

Which is better at coding, FLUX.1 [schnell] or Qwen: Qwen Plus 0728?

SWE-bench is missing for at least one model, so we do not rank coding from a single number.

Which is cheaper to run in production?

List prices are missing for at least one model.

Which is faster, FLUX.1 [schnell] or Qwen: Qwen Plus 0728?

We do not have TTFT for both models.

Which has the larger context window?

Context window is missing for at least one model.

Can I self-host either model?

FLUX.1 [schnell] is marked open-weights in our catalog. The other side is a closed API. Check the provider license before you ship weights.

Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?

No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.

What does preference Elo mean on this page?

Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. FLUX.1 [schnell] and Qwen: Qwen Plus 0728 Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.