Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 1, 2026

FLUX.1 [dev] vs Wan2.6 Text to Image benchmark

Name: FLUX.1 [dev] vs Wan2.6 Text to Image AI benchmark comparison
Creator: CompareLLM
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Comparing verified benchmark accuracy, speed, and token pricing between FLUX.1 [dev] and Wan2.6 Text to Image. Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.

Share Analysis:

Verified Head-to-Head Advantage Breakdown

4 direct benchmark disciplines evaluated across capability, speed, and cost

FLUX.1 [dev] (0)Wan2.6 Text to Image (4)

FLUX.1 [dev]

0 of 4 Wins

Competitive baseline across remaining benchmarks

Wan2.6 Text to Image

4 of 4 Wins

✓Image Elo✓Generation time✓Prompt adherence✓Text rendering

Black Forest Labs

FLUX.1 [dev]

Open-weights non-commercial base model with 12B parameters, serving as the foundation for the open-source fine-tuning ecosystem.

Open Dev 12BImg Elo 1,180$30/1k imgs

Alibaba

Leads 4 of 4 metrics

Wan2.6 Text to Image

Alibaba high-efficiency open video/image unified transformer backbone.

Img Elo 1,215$30/1k imgs

FLUX.1 Series Lineage & Sibling Variants

3 models

Currently comparing FLUX.1 [dev] vs Wan2.6 Text to Image. Alternative family tiers available.

Active: FLUX.1 [dev]

FLUX.1.1 [pro]$50/1k FLUX.1 [schnell]$15/1k

Top Rival Showdowns for FLUX.1 [dev]

All Matchups

Compare vs:vs GPT Image 2 (High)vs Reve 2.1 vs Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image)vs Ideogram 4.0 (Quality)vs Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro

Image Quality LeaderWan2.6 Text to Image Wins

Wan2.6 Text to Image

Δ 35 Image Elo pts

Generation Speed LeaderWan2.6 Text to Image Wins

Wan2.6 Text to Image

3.1s per render

Value per Dollar LeaderFLUX.1 [dev] Wins

FLUX.1 [dev]

$30/1k images

Head-to-Head Comparison

Overall Matchup Breakdown

Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.

FLUX.1 [dev] (0)vsWan2.6 Text to Image (4)

FLUX.1 [dev]: 0W (0%)Overall: Wan2.6 Text to ImageWan2.6 Text to Image: 4W (100%)

← FLUX.1 [dev]1 tiesWan2.6 Text to Image →

🏆Wan2.6 Text to Image(3/3)

Visual Quality & Adherence

Arena Preference Elo, prompt fidelity & typography score

Benchmark

FLUX.1 [dev]vsWan2.6 Text to Image

Image Elo

1,180vs1,215+35

Prompt adherence

87.5%vs89.5%+2%

Text rendering

86%vs87%+1%

FLUX.1 [dev]: 0WWan2.6 Text to Image: 3W

🏆Wan2.6 Text to Image(1/1)

Generation Latency

Time to render full-resolution image snapshot (seconds)

Benchmark

FLUX.1 [dev]vsWan2.6 Text to Image

Generation time

4svs3.1s+0.9s

FLUX.1 [dev]: 0WWan2.6 Text to Image: 1W

Tied (0-0)

Cost Efficiency

API inference cost per 1,000 generated images

Benchmark

FLUX.1 [dev]vsWan2.6 Text to Image

Price per 1k images

$30/1kvs$30/1k

FLUX.1 [dev]: 0WWan2.6 Text to Image: 0W

Side-by-Side Benchmark Matrix

Image Elo+35

FLUX.1 [dev]1,180

seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026

Wan2.6 Text to Image1,215

seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026

Generation time+0.9s

FLUX.1 [dev]4s

seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026

Wan2.6 Text to Image3.1s

seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026

Price per 1k images

FLUX.1 [dev]$30/1k

seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026

Wan2.6 Text to Image$30/1k

seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026

Prompt adherence+2%

FLUX.1 [dev]87.5%

seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026

Wan2.6 Text to Image89.5%

seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026

Text rendering+1%

FLUX.1 [dev]86%

seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026

Wan2.6 Text to Image87%

seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026

Benchmark	FLUX.1 [dev]	Wan2.6 Text to Image	Advantage Delta
Image Elo	1,180 seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026	1,215 seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026	+35
Generation time	4s seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026	3.1s seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026	+0.9s
Price per 1k images	$30/1k seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026	$30/1k seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026	—
Prompt adherence	87.5% seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026	89.5% seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026	+2%
Text rendering	86% seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026	87% seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026	+1%

Interactive Simulator (USD)

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).

Monthly Image Production Volume25k images / month (25000 imgs)

Quick Presets:

FLUX.1 [dev]$750.00 / mo

Rate: $30/1k

Wan2.6 Text to Image$750.00 / mo

Rate: $30/1k

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsinsufficient data

Need SWE-bench on both sides.

High-volume chatinsufficient data

Need list prices.

Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient data

Need TTFT on both sides.

Long-document RAGinsufficient data

Need context sizes.

Screenshots / visioninsufficient data

Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (undefined).

Target Workload	Recommended Pick	Evaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agents	insufficient data	Need SWE-bench on both sides.
High-volume chat	insufficient data	Need list prices.
Voice / low-latency UI	insufficient data	Need TTFT on both sides.
Long-document RAG	insufficient data	Need context sizes.
Screenshots / vision	insufficient data	Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (undefined).

Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Social Share Card Preview

Dynamic OpenGraph banner generated at /compare/flux-1-dev-vs-wan-2-6-t2i/opengraph-image

Save PNG

CompareLLM AI Matrix

Verified Head-to-Head Telemetry

LIVE BENCHMARK

Black Forest Labs

FLUX.1 [dev]

Elo n/a

SWE-bench—

Speed (tok/s)—

Input / 1M Tokens$30/1k

Output / 1M Tokens$30/1k

Alibaba

Wan2.6 Text to Image

Elo n/a

SWE-bench—

Speed (tok/s)—

Input / 1M Tokens$30/1k

Output / 1M Tokens$30/1k

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, FLUX.1 [dev] or Wan2.6 Text to Image?: We do not have preference Elo for both models, so we do not declare an overall winner. Compare the metrics that exist.
Which is better at coding, FLUX.1 [dev] or Wan2.6 Text to Image?: SWE-bench is missing for at least one model, so we do not rank coding from a single number.
Which is cheaper to run in production?: List prices are missing for at least one model.
Which is faster, FLUX.1 [dev] or Wan2.6 Text to Image?: We do not have TTFT for both models.
Which has the larger context window?: Context window is missing for at least one model.
Can I self-host either model?: Both FLUX.1 [dev] and Wan2.6 Text to Image are marked open-weights. Hosting cost is not in this table.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?: No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?: Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. FLUX.1 [dev] and Wan2.6 Text to Image Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All FLUX.1 [dev] matchups →|All Wan2.6 Text to Image matchups →

FLUX.1 [dev] vs FLUX.1 [schnell] (next flux)FLUX.2 [max] vs Wan2.6 Text to Image FLUX.2 [flex] vs Wan2.6 Text to Image Qwen Image 2.0 Pro vs Wan2.6 Text to Image FLUX.1 [schnell] vs Wan2.6 Text to Image FLUX.1.1 [pro] vs Wan2.6 Text to Image

Benchmark

FLUX.1 [dev]

Wan2.6 Text to Image

Advantage Delta

Image Elo

1,180

seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026

1,215

seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026

+35

Generation time

seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026

3.1s

seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026

+0.9s

Price per 1k images

$30/1k

seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026

$30/1k

seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026

—

Prompt adherence

87.5%

seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026

89.5%

seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026

+2%

Text rendering

86%

seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026

87%

seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026

+1%

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsinsufficient data

Need SWE-bench on both sides.

High-volume chatinsufficient data

Need list prices.

Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient data

Need TTFT on both sides.

Long-document RAGinsufficient data

Need context sizes.

Screenshots / visioninsufficient data

Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (undefined).

Target Workload	Recommended Pick	Evaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agents	insufficient data	Need SWE-bench on both sides.
High-volume chat	insufficient data	Need list prices.
Voice / low-latency UI	insufficient data	Need TTFT on both sides.
Long-document RAG	insufficient data	Need context sizes.
Screenshots / vision	insufficient data	Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (undefined).

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, FLUX.1 [dev] or Wan2.6 Text to Image?

We do not have preference Elo for both models, so we do not declare an overall winner. Compare the metrics that exist.

Which is better at coding, FLUX.1 [dev] or Wan2.6 Text to Image?

SWE-bench is missing for at least one model, so we do not rank coding from a single number.

Which is cheaper to run in production?

List prices are missing for at least one model.

Which is faster, FLUX.1 [dev] or Wan2.6 Text to Image?

We do not have TTFT for both models.

Which has the larger context window?

Context window is missing for at least one model.

Can I self-host either model?

Both FLUX.1 [dev] and Wan2.6 Text to Image are marked open-weights. Hosting cost is not in this table.

Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?

No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.

What does preference Elo mean on this page?

Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. FLUX.1 [dev] and Wan2.6 Text to Image Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.