Doubao Lite 1.5 vs Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct benchmark

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct1,425

Coding Elo+175

Doubao Lite 1.51,320

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct1,495

LiveBench+10.8%

Doubao Lite 1.554%

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct64.8%

SWE-bench+19.2%

Doubao Lite 1.546%

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct65.2%

GPQA Diamond

Doubao Lite 1.564.2%

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct—

Time to first token

Doubao Lite 1.5110 ms

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct—

Output speed

Doubao Lite 1.5180 tok/s

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct—

Input price+$0.62/1M

Doubao Lite 1.5$0.04/1M

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct$0.66/1M

Output price+$0.9/1M

Doubao Lite 1.5$0.1/1M

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct$1/1M

Context window

Doubao Lite 1.533k

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct33k

All Doubao Lite 1.5 matchups →|All Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct matchups →

Benchmark	Doubao Lite 1.5	Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct	Advantage Delta
Preference Elo	1,360 lmarena · Aug 17, 2026	1,425 lmarena · Aug 17, 2026	+65
Coding Elo	1,320 lmarena · Aug 17, 2026	1,495 lmarena · Aug 17, 2026	+175
LiveBench	54% livebench · Aug 17, 2026	64.8% livebench · Aug 17, 2026	+10.8%
SWE-bench	46% swebench · Aug 17, 2026	65.2% swebench · Aug 17, 2026	+19.2%
GPQA Diamond	64.2% seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026	—	—
Time to first token	110 ms seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026	—	—
Output speed	180 tok/s seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026	—	—
Input price	$0.04/1M seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026	$0.66/1M openrouter · Aug 17, 2026	+$0.62/1M
Output price	$0.1/1M seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026	$1/1M openrouter · Aug 17, 2026	+$0.9/1M
Context window	33k seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026	33k openrouter · Aug 17, 2026	—

Interactive Simulator (USD)

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).

Save up to 92% with Doubao Lite 1.5

Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo

Quick Presets:

Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out

RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)

Doubao Lite 1.5$2.90 / mo

In: $1.4Out: $1.5

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct$38.10 / mo

In: $23.1Out: $15

Estimated Cost Delta

Doubao Lite 1.5 is estimated to save $35.20/month ($422/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

1
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct:Pick Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct when repo-level coding accuracy is the constraint.
2
Doubao Lite 1.5:Pick Doubao Lite 1.5 when you are optimizing output cost.
3
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct:Pick Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct as the default general assistant.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsQwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct

Higher SWE-bench (65.2%).

High-volume chatDoubao Lite 1.5

Lower output list price ($0.1/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient data

Need TTFT on both sides.

Long-document RAGDoubao Lite 1.5

Larger window (33k).

Screenshots / visionQwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target Workload	Recommended Pick	Evaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agents	Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct	Higher SWE-bench (65.2%).
High-volume chat	Doubao Lite 1.5	Lower output list price ($0.1/1M).
Voice / low-latency UI	insufficient data	Need TTFT on both sides.
Long-document RAG	Doubao Lite 1.5	Larger window (33k).
Screenshots / vision	Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct	Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Social Share Card Preview

Dynamic OpenGraph banner generated at /compare/doubao-1-5-lite-vs-qwen-2-5-coder-32b-instruct/opengraph-image

Save PNG

CompareLLM AI Matrix

Verified Head-to-Head Telemetry

LIVE BENCHMARK

ByteDance

Doubao Lite 1.5

Elo 1,360

SWE-bench46%

Speed (tok/s)180 tok/s

Input / 1M Tokens$0.04/1M

Output / 1M Tokens$0.1/1M

Alibaba

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct

Elo 1,425

SWE-bench65.2%

Speed (tok/s)33k

Input / 1M Tokens$0.66/1M

Output / 1M Tokens$1/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Doubao Lite 1.5 or Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct?: Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct has the higher preference Elo in our latest snapshot (1,425). “Better” still depends on coding, price, and latency — see the table.
Which is better at coding, Doubao Lite 1.5 or Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct?: Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct leads SWE-bench at 65.2% vs 46%. SWE-bench is one harness, not your repo.
Which is cheaper to run in production?: Doubao Lite 1.5 output tokens are $0.1/1M versus $1/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, Doubao Lite 1.5 or Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct?: We do not have TTFT for both models.
Which has the larger context window?: Doubao Lite 1.5 accepts 33k tokens versus 33k.
Can I self-host either model?: Neither model is marked open-weights here. You are comparing hosted APIs.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?: No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?: Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Doubao Lite 1.5 and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

Doubao Lite 1.5 vs Doubao Pro 1.5 (next seed)Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs Qwen 2.5 Plus (next qwen)Doubao Pro 1.5 vs Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct Qwen 3 Max vs Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct Qwen QwQ 32B vs Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct Seed 2.1 Turbo vs Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct

Doubao Lite 1.5 vs Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct benchmark

Capability Percentiles

Relative percentile scores computed across all active models in the benchmark catalog.

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Leaders Matchup Capability Radar

Comparing top Western standard models with China's leading frontier rival across 6 skill dimensions. Tap any spoke or dot to inspect.

Tap any node to inspect

0–100 %ile

Side-by-Side Benchmark Matrix

Preference Elo+65

Doubao Lite 1.51,360

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct1,425

Coding Elo+175

Doubao Lite 1.51,320

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct1,495

LiveBench+10.8%

Doubao Lite 1.554%

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct64.8%

SWE-bench+19.2%

Doubao Lite 1.546%

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct65.2%

GPQA Diamond

Doubao Lite 1.564.2%

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct—

Time to first token

Doubao Lite 1.5110 ms

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct—

Output speed

Doubao Lite 1.5180 tok/s

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct—

Input price+$0.62/1M

Doubao Lite 1.5$0.04/1M

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct$0.66/1M

Output price+$0.9/1M

Doubao Lite 1.5$0.1/1M

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct$1/1M

Context window

Doubao Lite 1.533k

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct33k

Benchmark

Doubao Lite 1.5

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct

Advantage Delta

Preference Elo

1,360

1,425

+65

Coding Elo

1,320

1,495

+175

LiveBench

54%

64.8%

+10.8%

SWE-bench

46%

65.2%

+19.2%

GPQA Diamond

64.2%

—

Time to first token

110 ms

—

Output speed

180 tok/s

—

Input price

$0.04/1M

$0.66/1M

+$0.62/1M

Output price

$0.1/1M

$1/1M

+$0.9/1M

Context window

33k

33k