Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 17, 2026
In this head-to-head showdown, Doubao Pro 1.5 delivers higher overall intelligence and human-preferred responses (Elo 1,470 vs 1,425), while Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct leads in SWE-bench software engineering benchmarks (65.2%), while Doubao Pro 1.5 is more budget-friendly at $0.28/1M per 1M output tokens. Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.
7 direct benchmark disciplines evaluated across capability, speed, and cost
ByteDance flagship enterprise model with ultra-low token cost and 128k context.
Auto-discovered from OpenRouter (qwen/qwen-2.5-coder-32b-instruct). Preview until a second source matches.
Δ 45 Arena Elo pts
No latency data
$0.28 / 1M output
Relative percentile scores computed across all active models in the benchmark catalog.
Comparing top Western standard models with China's leading frontier rival across 6 skill dimensions. Tap any spoke or dot to inspect.
Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.
Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy
Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness
Cost per million tokens and max context window length
| Benchmark | Doubao Pro 1.5 | Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct | Advantage Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| Preference Elo | +45 | ||
| Coding Elo | +30 | ||
| LiveBench | +0.8% | ||
| SWE-bench | +3.1% | ||
| GPQA Diamond | — | — | |
| Time to first token | — | — | |
| Output speed | 105 tok/s | — | — |
| Input price | $0.11/1M | $0.66/1M | +$0.55/1M |
| Output price | $0.28/1M | +$0.72/1M | |
| Context window | +95k |
Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).
Doubao Pro 1.5 is estimated to save $30.05/month ($361/year).
Higher SWE-bench (65.2%).
Lower output list price ($0.28/1M).
Need TTFT on both sides.
Larger window (128k).
Doubao Pro 1.5 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.
| Target Workload | Recommended Pick | Evaluation Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Repo / coding agents | Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct | Higher SWE-bench (65.2%). |
| High-volume chat | Doubao Pro 1.5 | Lower output list price ($0.28/1M). |
| Voice / low-latency UI | insufficient data | Need TTFT on both sides. |
| Long-document RAG | Doubao Pro 1.5 | Larger window (128k). |
| Screenshots / vision | Doubao Pro 1.5 | Doubao Pro 1.5 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog. |
No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!
Dynamic OpenGraph banner generated at /compare/doubao-1-5-pro-128k-vs-qwen-2-5-coder-32b-instruct/opengraph-image
Verified Head-to-Head Telemetry
