CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
Explore
Compare
Decide
Track
Learn
…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

Theme:
Currency:
  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Qwen 2.5 Plus

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 17, 2026

DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Qwen 2.5 Plus benchmark

In this head-to-head showdown, DeepSeek V4 Flash delivers higher overall intelligence and human-preferred responses (Elo 1,490 vs 1,445), while DeepSeek V4 Flash leads in SWE-bench software engineering benchmarks (71.2%), while DeepSeek V4 Flash is more budget-friendly at $0.28/1M per 1M output tokens. Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.

Executive Comparison Verdict

Bottom Line: DeepSeek V4 Flash holds the advantage over Qwen 2.5 Plus in overall benchmark performance and human evaluation rankings. Choose DeepSeek V4 Flash for demanding workloads, or review the breakdown below to compare coding and pricing metrics.
Share Analysis:Share:
WhatsAppTelegramXLinkedIn
Executive Verdict Summary

DeepSeek V4 Flash holds empirical advantage (10 of 10 metrics)

Coding / SWESWE-bench
DeepSeek V4 FlashTop code solve rate
ReasoningGPQA / Live
DeepSeek V4 FlashTop logical accuracy
Best Value$/1M Tok
DeepSeek V4 FlashLowest API billing cost
Speed / TokTok/Sec
DeepSeek V4 FlashFastest stream rate

Verified Advantage Breakdown

10 benchmarks evaluated across capability, speed, and cost

DeepSeek V4 Flash (10)Qwen 2.5 Plus (0)
DeepSeek V4 Flash
10 of 10 Wins
✓Preference Elo✓Coding Elo✓LiveBench✓SWE-bench✓GPQA Diamond✓Time to first token✓Output speed✓Input price✓Output price✓Context window
Qwen 2.5 Plus
0 of 10 Wins
Competitive baseline across remaining benchmarks
DeepSeek
Leads 10 of 10
DeepSeek V4 Flash

DeepSeek Jul 31 2026 price-performance SKU. Public listings put it near $0.14/$0.28 per 1M tokens.

V4 Flash SpeedElo 1,490In: $0.14 · Out: $0.28/1M
Alibaba
Qwen 2.5 Plus

Alibaba balanced flagship API model with high-throughput general reasoning.

Elo 1,445In: $0.25 · Out: $1/1M

DeepSeek V4 Series Lineage & Sibling Variants

2 models

Currently comparing DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Qwen 2.5 Plus. Alternative family tiers available.

Active: DeepSeek V4 Flash
DeepSeek V4 Pro$3.96
Top Rival Showdowns for DeepSeek V4 Flash
All Matchups
Compare vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5vs GPT-5vs Gemini 3 Provs Grok 4.6vs Qwen 3 Max
Preference LeaderDeepSeek V4 Flash Wins

DeepSeek V4 Flash

Δ 45 Arena Elo pts

Throughput LeaderDeepSeek V4 Flash Wins

DeepSeek V4 Flash

142 tok/s

Value per Dollar LeaderDeepSeek V4 Flash Wins

DeepSeek V4 Flash

$0.28 / 1M output

Capability Percentiles

Relative percentile scores computed across all active models in the benchmark catalog.

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Leaders Matchup Capability Radar

Comparing top standard models across 6 key capability dimensions. Tap any spoke or dot to inspect.

Tap any node to inspect
0–100 %ile

Overall Matchup Breakdown

Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.

DeepSeek V4 Flash (10)vsQwen 2.5 Plus (0)
DeepSeek V4 Flash: 10W (100%)Overall: DeepSeek V4 FlashQwen 2.5 Plus: 0W (0%)
← DeepSeek V4 FlashQwen 2.5 Plus →
🏆DeepSeek V4 Flash Leads(5/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Benchmark
DeepSeek V4 FlashvsQwen 2.5 Plus
Preference Elo
1,490vs1,445+45
Coding Elo
1,516vs1,460+56
SWE-bench
71.2%vs59.2%+12%
LiveBench
67.8%vs63.5%+4.3%
GPQA Diamond
81.6%vs75.8%+5.8%
DeepSeek V4 Flash: 5WQwen 2.5 Plus: 0W
🏆DeepSeek V4 Flash Leads(2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Benchmark
DeepSeek V4 FlashvsQwen 2.5 Plus
Output speed
142 tok/svs110 tok/s+32 tok/s
Time to first token
165 msvs180 ms+15 ms
DeepSeek V4 Flash: 2WQwen 2.5 Plus: 0W
🏆DeepSeek V4 Flash Leads(3/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Benchmark
DeepSeek V4 FlashvsQwen 2.5 Plus
Output price
$0.28/1Mvs$1/1M+$0.72/1M
Input price
$0.14/1Mvs$0.25/1M+$0.11/1M
Context window
1.3Mvs128k+1.2M
DeepSeek V4 Flash: 3WQwen 2.5 Plus: 0W

Side-by-Side Benchmark Matrix

DeepSeek V4 FlashQwen 2.5 Plus
Preference EloDeepSeek V4 Flash +45
DeepSeek V4 Flash1,490
Qwen 2.5 Plus1,445
Coding EloDeepSeek V4 Flash +56
DeepSeek V4 Flash1,516
Qwen 2.5 Plus1,460
LiveBenchDeepSeek V4 Flash +4.3%
DeepSeek V4 Flash67.8%
Qwen 2.5 Plus63.5%
SWE-benchDeepSeek V4 Flash +12%
DeepSeek V4 Flash71.2%
Qwen 2.5 Plus59.2%
GPQA DiamondDeepSeek V4 Flash +5.8%
DeepSeek V4 Flash81.6%
Qwen 2.5 Plus75.8%
Time to first tokenDeepSeek V4 Flash +15 ms
DeepSeek V4 Flash165 ms
Qwen 2.5 Plus180 ms
Output speedDeepSeek V4 Flash +32 tok/s
DeepSeek V4 Flash142 tok/s
Qwen 2.5 Plus110 tok/s
Input priceDeepSeek V4 Flash +$0.11/1M
DeepSeek V4 Flash$0.14/1M
Qwen 2.5 Plus$0.25/1M
Output priceDeepSeek V4 Flash +$0.72/1M
DeepSeek V4 Flash$0.28/1M
Qwen 2.5 Plus$1/1M
Context windowDeepSeek V4 Flash +1.2M
DeepSeek V4 Flash1.3M
Qwen 2.5 Plus128k
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashQwen 2.5 PlusAdvantage Delta
Preference Elo
1,490
lmarena · Aug 16, 2026
1,445
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
+45
Coding Elo
1,516
lmarena · Aug 16, 2026
1,460
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
+56
LiveBench
67.8%
livebench · Aug 16, 2026
63.5%
livebench · Aug 17, 2026
+4.3%
SWE-bench
71.2%
swebench · Aug 16, 2026
59.2%
swebench · Aug 17, 2026
+12%
GPQA Diamond
81.6%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
75.8%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+5.8%
Time to first token
165 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
180 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+15 ms
Output speed
142 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
110 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+32 tok/s
Input price
$0.14/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
$0.25/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+$0.11/1M
Output price
$0.28/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
$1/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+$0.72/1M
Context window
1.3M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
128k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+1.2M

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).

Save 62% with DeepSeek V4 Flash
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
DeepSeek V4 Flash$9.10 / mo
In: $4.9Out: $4.2
Qwen 2.5 Plus$23.75 / mo
In: $8.75Out: $15
Estimated Cost Delta

DeepSeek V4 Flash is estimated to save $14.65/month ($176/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    DeepSeek V4 Flash:Pick DeepSeek V4 Flash when repo-level coding accuracy is the constraint.
  • 2
    DeepSeek V4 Flash:Pick DeepSeek V4 Flash when time-to-first-token matters more than peak Elo.
  • 3
    DeepSeek V4 Flash:Pick DeepSeek V4 Flash for million-token RAG or long-document jobs.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsDeepSeek V4 Flash

Higher SWE-bench (71.2%).

High-volume chatDeepSeek V4 Flash

Lower output list price ($0.28/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIDeepSeek V4 Flash

Lower TTFT (165 ms).

Long-document RAGDeepSeek V4 Flash

Larger window (1.3M).

Screenshots / visionQwen 2.5 Plus

Qwen 2.5 Plus is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsDeepSeek V4 FlashHigher SWE-bench (71.2%).
High-volume chatDeepSeek V4 FlashLower output list price ($0.28/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIDeepSeek V4 FlashLower TTFT (165 ms).
Long-document RAGDeepSeek V4 FlashLarger window (1.3M).
Screenshots / visionQwen 2.5 PlusQwen 2.5 Plus is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

View all news
priceJul 31, 2026

DeepSeek V4 Flash (Jul 31): the $0.14/$0.28 price-performance SKU

Public listings put Flash near $0.14/$0.28 per 1M. That is a batch SKU, not a chatbot crown.

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Social Share Card Preview

Dynamic OpenGraph banner generated at /compare/deepseek-v4-flash-vs-qwen-2-5-plus/opengraph-image

Save PNG

CompareLLM AI Matrix

Verified Head-to-Head Telemetry

LIVE BENCHMARK
VS
DeepSeek

DeepSeek V4 Flash

Elo 1,490
SWE-bench71.2%
Speed (tok/s)142 tok/s
Input / 1M Tokens$0.14/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$0.28/1M
Alibaba

Qwen 2.5 Plus

Elo 1,445
SWE-bench59.2%
Speed (tok/s)110 tok/s
Input / 1M Tokens$0.25/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$1/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, DeepSeek V4 Flash or Qwen 2.5 Plus?
DeepSeek V4 Flash has the higher preference Elo in our latest snapshot (1,490). “Better” still depends on coding, price, and latency — see the table.
Which is better at coding, DeepSeek V4 Flash or Qwen 2.5 Plus?
DeepSeek V4 Flash leads SWE-bench at 71.2% vs 59.2%. SWE-bench is one harness, not your repo.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
DeepSeek V4 Flash output tokens are $0.28/1M versus $1/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, DeepSeek V4 Flash or Qwen 2.5 Plus?
DeepSeek V4 Flash has the lower time-to-first-token (165 ms vs 180 ms). Tokens/sec is a separate column if you care about long completions.
Which has the larger context window?
DeepSeek V4 Flash accepts 1.3M tokens versus 128k.
Can I self-host either model?
DeepSeek V4 Flash is marked open-weights in our catalog. The other side is a closed API. Check the provider license before you ship weights.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. DeepSeek V4 Flash and Qwen 2.5 Plus Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Related news

  • price · Jul 31, 2026

    DeepSeek V4 Flash (Jul 31): the $0.14/$0.28 price-performance SKU

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All DeepSeek V4 Flash matchups →|All Qwen 2.5 Plus matchups →
DeepSeek V4 Flash vs DeepSeek V4 Pro (previous deepseek)Qwen 2.5 Plus vs Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct (previous qwen)Qwen 2.5 Plus vs Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B (next qwen)Qwen QwQ 32B vs DeepSeek V4 FlashQwen 3 Max vs DeepSeek V4 FlashQwen3 235B vs Qwen 2.5 Plus