CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
Explore
Compare
Decide
Track
Learn
…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

Theme:
Currency:
  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest vs GLM-5.2

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 17, 2026noindex (thin pair)

DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest vs GLM-5.2 benchmark

In this head-to-head showdown, DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest is more budget-friendly at $0.121/1M per 1M output tokens. Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.

Executive Comparison Verdict

Bottom Line: Both DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest and GLM-5.2 present distinct architectural strengths. Compare the verified benchmark matrix below to choose the model tailored to your specific application requirements.
Share Analysis:Share:
WhatsAppTelegramXLinkedIn
Executive Verdict Summary

DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest holds empirical advantage (3 of 3 metrics)

Coding / SWESWE-bench
GLM-5.2Top code solve rate
ReasoningGPQA / Live
GLM-5.2Top logical accuracy
Best Value$/1M Tok
DeepSeek V4 Flash LatestLowest API billing cost
Speed / TokTok/Sec
GLM-5.2Fastest stream rate

Verified Advantage Breakdown

3 benchmarks evaluated across capability, speed, and cost

DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest (3)GLM-5.2 (0)
DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest
3 of 3 Wins
✓Input price✓Output price✓Context window
GLM-5.2
0 of 3 Wins
Competitive baseline across remaining benchmarks
~deepseek
Leads 3 of 3
DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest

Auto-discovered from OpenRouter (~deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-latest). Preview until a second source matches.

In: $0.06 · Out: $0.121/1M
Zhipu
GLM-5.2

Zhipu flagship. Strong Chinese/English coding and agents.

GLM-5.2Elo 1,492In: $1.19 · Out: $3.74/1M
Top Rival Showdowns for DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest
All Matchups
Compare vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5vs GPT-5vs Gemini 3 Provs Grok 4.6vs DeepSeek V4 Pro
Preference Leader

No shared data

Single model data

Throughput Leader

No shared data

No latency data

Value per Dollar LeaderDeepSeek V4 Flash Latest Wins

DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest

$0.12060000000000001 / 1M output

Capability Percentiles

Relative percentile scores computed across all active models in the benchmark catalog.

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Leaders Matchup Capability Radar

Comparing top standard models across 6 key capability dimensions. Tap any spoke or dot to inspect.

Tap any node to inspect
0–100 %ile

Overall Matchup Breakdown

Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.

DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest (3)vsGLM-5.2 (7)
DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest: 3W (30%)Overall: GLM-5.2GLM-5.2: 7W (70%)
← DeepSeek V4 Flash LatestGLM-5.2 →
🏆GLM-5.2 Leads(5/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Benchmark
DeepSeek V4 Flash LatestvsGLM-5.2
Preference Elo
—vs1,492
Coding Elo
—vs1,504
SWE-bench
—vs69.3%
LiveBench
—vs65.2%
GPQA Diamond
—vs79.5%
DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest: 0WGLM-5.2: 5W
🏆GLM-5.2 Leads(2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Benchmark
DeepSeek V4 Flash LatestvsGLM-5.2
Output speed
—vs84 tok/s
Time to first token
—vs270 ms
DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest: 0WGLM-5.2: 2W
🏆DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest Leads(3/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Benchmark
DeepSeek V4 Flash LatestvsGLM-5.2
Output price
$0.121/1Mvs$3.74/1M+$3.619/1M
Input price
$0.06/1Mvs$1.19/1M+$1.13/1M
Context window
1.3Mvs1M+262k
DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest: 3WGLM-5.2: 0W

Side-by-Side Benchmark Matrix

DeepSeek V4 Flash LatestGLM-5.2
Preference Elo
DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest—
GLM-5.21,492
Coding Elo
DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest—
GLM-5.21,504
LiveBench
DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest—
GLM-5.265.2%
SWE-bench
DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest—
GLM-5.269.3%
GPQA Diamond
DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest—
GLM-5.279.5%
Time to first token
DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest—
GLM-5.2270 ms
Output speed
DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest—
GLM-5.284 tok/s
Input priceDeepSeek V4 Flash Latest +$1.13/1M
DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest$0.06/1M
GLM-5.2$1.19/1M
Output priceDeepSeek V4 Flash Latest +$3.619/1M
DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest$0.121/1M
GLM-5.2$3.74/1M
Context windowDeepSeek V4 Flash Latest +262k
DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest1.3M
GLM-5.21M
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash LatestGLM-5.2Advantage Delta
Preference Elo—
1,492
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
—
Coding Elo—
1,504
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
—
LiveBench—
65.2%
livebench · Aug 17, 2026
—
SWE-bench—
69.3%
swebench · Aug 17, 2026
—
GPQA Diamond—
79.5%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
—
Time to first token—
270 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
—
Output speed—
84 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
—
Input price
$0.06/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
$1.19/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
+$1.13/1M
Output price
$0.121/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
$3.74/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
+$3.619/1M
Context window
1.3M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
+262k

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).

Save 96% with DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest$3.92 / mo
In: $2.11Out: $1.81
GLM-5.2$97.75 / mo
In: $41.65Out: $56.1
Estimated Cost Delta

DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest is estimated to save $93.83/month ($1,126/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest:Pick DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest when you are optimizing output cost.
  • 2
    DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest:Pick DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest for million-token RAG or long-document jobs.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsinsufficient data

Need SWE-bench on both sides.

High-volume chatDeepSeek V4 Flash Latest

Lower output list price ($0.121/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient data

Need TTFT on both sides.

Long-document RAGDeepSeek V4 Flash Latest

Larger window (1.3M).

Screenshots / visionGLM-5.2

GLM-5.2 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsinsufficient dataNeed SWE-bench on both sides.
High-volume chatDeepSeek V4 Flash LatestLower output list price ($0.121/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient dataNeed TTFT on both sides.
Long-document RAGDeepSeek V4 Flash LatestLarger window (1.3M).
Screenshots / visionGLM-5.2GLM-5.2 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

View all news
newsAug 16, 2026

GLM-5.2 vs GLM 5V Turbo Price and SWE-bench 2026

GLM-5.2 undercuts GLM 5V Turbo by 74.2% on input at $0.31/1M, with 1,492 Elo and 69.3% SWE-bench in dated 2026 snapshots.

launchJun 18, 2026

GLM-5.2 remains the prior Zhipu flagship for upgrade pairs

Strong Chinese/English coding. 5.3 is the new row; 5.2 stays so the delta is visible.

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Social Share Card Preview

Dynamic OpenGraph banner generated at /compare/deepseek-v4-flash-latest-vs-glm-5-2/opengraph-image

Save PNG

CompareLLM AI Matrix

Verified Head-to-Head Telemetry

LIVE BENCHMARK
VS
~deepseek

DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest

Elo n/a
SWE-bench—
Speed (tok/s)1.3M
Input / 1M Tokens$0.06/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$0.121/1M
Zhipu

GLM-5.2

Elo 1,492
SWE-bench69.3%
Speed (tok/s)84 tok/s
Input / 1M Tokens$1.19/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$3.74/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest or GLM-5.2?
We do not have preference Elo for both models, so we do not declare an overall winner. Compare the metrics that exist.
Which is better at coding, DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest or GLM-5.2?
SWE-bench is missing for at least one model, so we do not rank coding from a single number.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest output tokens are $0.121/1M versus $3.74/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest or GLM-5.2?
We do not have TTFT for both models.
Which has the larger context window?
DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest accepts 1.3M tokens versus 1M.
Can I self-host either model?
GLM-5.2 is marked open-weights in our catalog. The other side is a closed API. Check the provider license before you ship weights.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest and GLM-5.2 Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Related news

  • news · Aug 16, 2026

    GLM-5.2 vs GLM 5V Turbo Price and SWE-bench 2026

  • launch · Jun 18, 2026

    GLM-5.2 remains the prior Zhipu flagship for upgrade pairs

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest matchups →|All GLM-5.2 matchups →
GLM-5.2 vs Z.ai: GLM 5V Turbo (next glm)GLM-5.3 vs GLM-5.2Claude Opus 4.5 vs GLM-5.2Claude Opus 4.6 vs GLM-5.2Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs GLM-5.2GPT-5 vs GLM-5.2