CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
Explore
Compare
Decide
Track
Learn
…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

Theme:
Currency:
  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. DeepSeek V3 vs Meta: Llama Guard 4 12B

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 17, 2026noindex (thin pair)

DeepSeek V3 vs Meta: Llama Guard 4 12B benchmark

In this head-to-head showdown, Meta: Llama Guard 4 12B is more budget-friendly at $0.18/1M per 1M output tokens. Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.

Executive Comparison Verdict

Bottom Line: Choose DeepSeek V3 if your priority is peak reasoning, complex code generation, and top preference Elo. Choose Meta: Llama Guard 4 12B if you are optimizing for low latency, high throughput, and cost-efficient API deployment.
Share Analysis:Share:
WhatsAppTelegramXLinkedIn
Executive Verdict Summary

Meta: Llama Guard 4 12B holds empirical advantage (3 of 3 metrics)

Coding / SWESWE-bench
DeepSeek V3Top code solve rate
ReasoningGPQA / Live
DeepSeek V3Top logical accuracy
Best Value$/1M Tok
Meta: Llama Guard 4 12BLowest API billing cost
Speed / TokTok/Sec
DeepSeek V3Fastest stream rate

Verified Advantage Breakdown

3 benchmarks evaluated across capability, speed, and cost

DeepSeek V3 (0)Meta: Llama Guard 4 12B (3)
DeepSeek V3
0 of 3 Wins
Competitive baseline across remaining benchmarks
Meta: Llama Guard 4 12B
3 of 3 Wins
✓Input price✓Output price✓Context window
DeepSeek
DeepSeek V3

Prior DeepSeek flagship. Baseline for v3 vs v4.

Elo 1,310In: $0.257 · Out: $1.029/1M
Meta
Leads 3 of 3
Meta: Llama Guard 4 12B

Auto-discovered from OpenRouter (meta-llama/llama-guard-4-12b). Preview until a second source matches.

In: $0.18 · Out: $0.18/1M
Top Rival Showdowns for DeepSeek V3
All Matchups
Compare vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5vs GPT-5vs Gemini 3 Provs Grok 4.6vs Qwen 3 Max
Preference Leader

No shared data

Single model data

Throughput Leader

No shared data

No latency data

Value per Dollar LeaderMeta: Llama Guard 4 12B Wins

Meta: Llama Guard 4 12B

$0.18 / 1M output

Capability Percentiles

Relative percentile scores computed across all active models in the benchmark catalog.

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Leaders Matchup Capability Radar

Comparing top standard models across 6 key capability dimensions. Tap any spoke or dot to inspect.

Tap any node to inspect
0–100 %ile

Overall Matchup Breakdown

Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.

DeepSeek V3 (6)vsMeta: Llama Guard 4 12B (3)
DeepSeek V3: 6W (67%)Overall: DeepSeek V3Meta: Llama Guard 4 12B: 3W (33%)
← DeepSeek V3Meta: Llama Guard 4 12B →
🏆DeepSeek V3 Leads(4/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Benchmark
DeepSeek V3vsMeta: Llama Guard 4 12B
Preference Elo
1,310vs—
Coding Elo
—vs—
SWE-bench
48.6%vs—
LiveBench
55.4%vs—
GPQA Diamond
59.1%vs—
DeepSeek V3: 4WMeta: Llama Guard 4 12B: 0W
🏆DeepSeek V3 Leads(2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Benchmark
DeepSeek V3vsMeta: Llama Guard 4 12B
Output speed
66 tok/svs—
Time to first token
380 msvs—
DeepSeek V3: 2WMeta: Llama Guard 4 12B: 0W
🏆Meta: Llama Guard 4 12B Leads(3/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Benchmark
DeepSeek V3vsMeta: Llama Guard 4 12B
Output price
$1.029/1Mvs$0.18/1M+$0.849/1M
Input price
$0.257/1Mvs$0.18/1M+$0.077/1M
Context window
164kvs1M+885k
DeepSeek V3: 0WMeta: Llama Guard 4 12B: 3W

Side-by-Side Benchmark Matrix

DeepSeek V3Meta: Llama Guard 4 12B
Preference Elo
DeepSeek V31,310
Meta: Llama Guard 4 12B—
LiveBench
DeepSeek V355.4%
Meta: Llama Guard 4 12B—
SWE-bench
DeepSeek V348.6%
Meta: Llama Guard 4 12B—
GPQA Diamond
DeepSeek V359.1%
Meta: Llama Guard 4 12B—
Time to first token
DeepSeek V3380 ms
Meta: Llama Guard 4 12B—
Output speed
DeepSeek V366 tok/s
Meta: Llama Guard 4 12B—
Input priceMeta: Llama Guard 4 12B +$0.077/1M
DeepSeek V3$0.257/1M
Meta: Llama Guard 4 12B$0.18/1M
Output priceMeta: Llama Guard 4 12B +$0.849/1M
DeepSeek V3$1.029/1M
Meta: Llama Guard 4 12B$0.18/1M
Context windowMeta: Llama Guard 4 12B +885k
DeepSeek V3164k
Meta: Llama Guard 4 12B1M
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3Meta: Llama Guard 4 12BAdvantage Delta
Preference Elo
1,310
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
——
LiveBench
55.4%
livebench · Aug 17, 2026
——
SWE-bench
48.6%
swebench · Aug 17, 2026
——
GPQA Diamond
59.1%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
——
Time to first token
380 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
——
Output speed
66 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
——
Input price
$0.257/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
$0.18/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
+$0.077/1M
Output price
$1.029/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
$0.18/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
+$0.849/1M
Context window
164k
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
+885k

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).

Save 63% with Meta: Llama Guard 4 12B
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
DeepSeek V3$24.44 / mo
In: $9.01Out: $15.43
Meta: Llama Guard 4 12B$9.00 / mo
In: $6.3Out: $2.7
Estimated Cost Delta

Meta: Llama Guard 4 12B is estimated to save $15.44/month ($185/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    Meta: Llama Guard 4 12B:Pick Meta: Llama Guard 4 12B when you are optimizing output cost.
  • 2
    Meta: Llama Guard 4 12B:Pick Meta: Llama Guard 4 12B for million-token RAG or long-document jobs.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsinsufficient data

Need SWE-bench on both sides.

High-volume chatMeta: Llama Guard 4 12B

Lower output list price ($0.18/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient data

Need TTFT on both sides.

Long-document RAGMeta: Llama Guard 4 12B

Larger window (1M).

Screenshots / visionMeta: Llama Guard 4 12B

Meta: Llama Guard 4 12B is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsinsufficient dataNeed SWE-bench on both sides.
High-volume chatMeta: Llama Guard 4 12BLower output list price ($0.18/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient dataNeed TTFT on both sides.
Long-document RAGMeta: Llama Guard 4 12BLarger window (1M).
Screenshots / visionMeta: Llama Guard 4 12BMeta: Llama Guard 4 12B is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Social Share Card Preview

Dynamic OpenGraph banner generated at /compare/deepseek-v3-vs-llama-guard-4-12b/opengraph-image

Save PNG

CompareLLM AI Matrix

Verified Head-to-Head Telemetry

LIVE BENCHMARK
VS
DeepSeek

DeepSeek V3

Elo 1,310
SWE-bench48.6%
Speed (tok/s)66 tok/s
Input / 1M Tokens$0.257/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$1.029/1M
Meta

Meta: Llama Guard 4 12B

Elo n/a
SWE-bench—
Speed (tok/s)1M
Input / 1M Tokens$0.18/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$0.18/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, DeepSeek V3 or Meta: Llama Guard 4 12B?
We do not have preference Elo for both models, so we do not declare an overall winner. Compare the metrics that exist.
Which is better at coding, DeepSeek V3 or Meta: Llama Guard 4 12B?
SWE-bench is missing for at least one model, so we do not rank coding from a single number.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
Meta: Llama Guard 4 12B output tokens are $0.18/1M versus $1.029/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, DeepSeek V3 or Meta: Llama Guard 4 12B?
We do not have TTFT for both models.
Which has the larger context window?
Meta: Llama Guard 4 12B accepts 1M tokens versus 164k.
Can I self-host either model?
DeepSeek V3 is marked open-weights in our catalog. The other side is a closed API. Check the provider license before you ship weights.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. DeepSeek V3 and Meta: Llama Guard 4 12B Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All DeepSeek V3 matchups →|All Meta: Llama Guard 4 12B matchups →
DeepSeek V3 vs DeepSeek Coder V2 (previous deepseek)DeepSeek V3 vs DeepSeek R1 (next deepseek)Llama 4 Maverick vs DeepSeek V3DeepSeek V4 Pro vs DeepSeek V3DeepSeek V4 Flash vs DeepSeek V3Llama 3.3 70B vs DeepSeek V3