CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
Leaderboard
Models
Compare
Best of & Stacks
Research & News
…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

Theme:
Currency:
  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. DeepSeek R1 vs Qwen: Qwen3 32B

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 17, 2026noindex (thin pair)

DeepSeek R1 vs Qwen: Qwen3 32B benchmark

In this head-to-head showdown, Qwen: Qwen3 32B is more budget-friendly at $0.28/1M per 1M output tokens. Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.

Executive Comparison Verdict

Bottom Line: Choose DeepSeek R1 if your priority is peak reasoning, complex code generation, and top preference Elo. Choose Qwen: Qwen3 32B if you are optimizing for low latency, high throughput, and cost-efficient API deployment.
Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramXLinkedInReddit

Verified Head-to-Head Advantage Breakdown

3 direct benchmark disciplines evaluated across capability, speed, and cost

DeepSeek R1 (0)Qwen: Qwen3 32B (3)
DeepSeek R1
0 of 3 Wins
Competitive baseline across remaining benchmarks
Qwen: Qwen3 32B
3 of 3 Wins
✓Input price✓Output price✓Context window
DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1

Open-weights reasoning model trained with large-scale RL.

Elo 1,358$2.5/1M out
Alibaba
Leads 3 of 3 metrics
Qwen: Qwen3 32B

Auto-discovered from OpenRouter (qwen/qwen3-32b). Preview until a second source matches.

$0.28/1M out

DeepSeek R1 Thinking Depth & Cost Scaler

Model A

Simulate accuracy gains vs added response time & token cost

Mode: Medium (Full RL CoT)

Reasoning models “think before answering” by generating internal reasoning tokens. Higher effort improves math, coding, and logic accuracy, but increases response delay and token costs.

Thinking Delay
420 ms
Standard speed
Reasoning Depth
~2,800
Internal tokens
Cost / 1k Calls
$8.10
7.4× standard bill
Accuracy Boost
+6.5% accuracy
STEM & SWE-bench
Top Rival Showdowns for DeepSeek R1
All Matchups
Compare vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5vs GPT-5vs Gemini 3 Provs Grok 4.6vs Qwen 3 Max
Preference Leader

No shared data

Single model data

Throughput Leader

No shared data

No latency data

Value per Dollar LeaderQwen: Qwen3 32B Wins

Qwen: Qwen3 32B

$0.28 / 1M output

Capability Percentiles

Relative percentile scores computed across all active models in the benchmark catalog.

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Leaders Matchup Capability Radar

Comparing top Western standard models with China's leading frontier rival across 6 skill dimensions. Tap any spoke or dot to inspect.

Tap any node to inspect
0–100 %ile
Head-to-Head Comparison

Overall Matchup Breakdown

Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.

DeepSeek R1 (6)vsQwen: Qwen3 32B (3)
DeepSeek R1: 6W (67%)Overall: DeepSeek R1Qwen: Qwen3 32B: 3W (33%)
← DeepSeek R1Qwen: Qwen3 32B →
🏆DeepSeek R1(4/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Benchmark
DeepSeek R1vsQwen: Qwen3 32B
Preference Elo
1,358vs—
Coding Elo
—vs—
SWE-bench
65.2%vs—
LiveBench
59%vs—
GPQA Diamond
79.8%vs—
DeepSeek R1: 4WQwen: Qwen3 32B: 0W
🏆DeepSeek R1(2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Benchmark
DeepSeek R1vsQwen: Qwen3 32B
Output speed
62 tok/svs—
Time to first token
420 msvs—
DeepSeek R1: 2WQwen: Qwen3 32B: 0W
🏆Qwen: Qwen3 32B(3/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Benchmark
DeepSeek R1vsQwen: Qwen3 32B
Output price
$2.5/1Mvs$0.28/1M+$2.22/1M
Input price
$0.7/1Mvs$0.08/1M+$0.62/1M
Context window
64kvs131k+67k
DeepSeek R1: 0WQwen: Qwen3 32B: 3W

Side-by-Side Benchmark Matrix

Preference Elo
DeepSeek R11,358
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
Qwen: Qwen3 32B—
LiveBench
DeepSeek R159%
livebench · Aug 17, 2026
Qwen: Qwen3 32B—
SWE-bench
DeepSeek R165.2%
swebench · Aug 17, 2026
Qwen: Qwen3 32B—
GPQA Diamond
DeepSeek R179.8%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Qwen: Qwen3 32B—
Time to first token
DeepSeek R1420 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Qwen: Qwen3 32B—
Output speed
DeepSeek R162 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Qwen: Qwen3 32B—
Input price+$0.62/1M
DeepSeek R1$0.7/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
Qwen: Qwen3 32B$0.08/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
Output price+$2.22/1M
DeepSeek R1$2.5/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
Qwen: Qwen3 32B$0.28/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
Context window+67k
DeepSeek R164k
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
Qwen: Qwen3 32B131k
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
BenchmarkDeepSeek R1Qwen: Qwen3 32BAdvantage Delta
Preference Elo
1,358
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
——
LiveBench
59%
livebench · Aug 17, 2026
——
SWE-bench
65.2%
swebench · Aug 17, 2026
——
GPQA Diamond
79.8%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
——
Time to first token
420 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
——
Output speed
62 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
——
Input price
$0.7/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
$0.08/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
+$0.62/1M
Output price
$2.5/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
$0.28/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
+$2.22/1M
Context window
64k
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
131k
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
+67k
Interactive Simulator (USD)

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).

Save up to 89% with Qwen: Qwen3 32B
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
DeepSeek R1$62.00 / mo
In: $24.5Out: $37.5
Qwen: Qwen3 32B$7.00 / mo
In: $2.8Out: $4.2
Estimated Cost Delta

Qwen: Qwen3 32B is estimated to save $55.00/month ($660/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    Qwen: Qwen3 32B:Pick Qwen: Qwen3 32B when you are optimizing output cost.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsinsufficient data

Need SWE-bench on both sides.

High-volume chatQwen: Qwen3 32B

Lower output list price ($0.28/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient data

Need TTFT on both sides.

Long-document RAGQwen: Qwen3 32B

Larger window (131k).

Screenshots / visionQwen: Qwen3 32B

Qwen: Qwen3 32B is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsinsufficient dataNeed SWE-bench on both sides.
High-volume chatQwen: Qwen3 32BLower output list price ($0.28/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient dataNeed TTFT on both sides.
Long-document RAGQwen: Qwen3 32BLarger window (131k).
Screenshots / visionQwen: Qwen3 32BQwen: Qwen3 32B is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

View all news
launchJan 20, 2025

DeepSeek R1 stays as the open-weights RL baseline

Jan 2025 reasoning model. Still searched. V4 Pro is the newer DeepSeek buy.

Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Social Share Card Preview

Dynamic OpenGraph banner generated at /compare/deepseek-r1-vs-qwen3-32b/opengraph-image

Save PNG

CompareLLM AI Matrix

Verified Head-to-Head Telemetry

LIVE BENCHMARK
VS
DeepSeek

DeepSeek R1

Elo 1,358
SWE-bench65.2%
Speed (tok/s)62 tok/s
Input / 1M Tokens$0.7/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$2.5/1M
Alibaba

Qwen: Qwen3 32B

Elo n/a
SWE-bench—
Speed (tok/s)131k
Input / 1M Tokens$0.08/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$0.28/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, DeepSeek R1 or Qwen: Qwen3 32B?
We do not have preference Elo for both models, so we do not declare an overall winner. Compare the metrics that exist.
Which is better at coding, DeepSeek R1 or Qwen: Qwen3 32B?
SWE-bench is missing for at least one model, so we do not rank coding from a single number.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
Qwen: Qwen3 32B output tokens are $0.28/1M versus $2.5/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, DeepSeek R1 or Qwen: Qwen3 32B?
We do not have TTFT for both models.
Which has the larger context window?
Qwen: Qwen3 32B accepts 131k tokens versus 64k.
Can I self-host either model?
DeepSeek R1 is marked open-weights in our catalog. The other side is a closed API. Check the provider license before you ship weights.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. DeepSeek R1 and Qwen: Qwen3 32B Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Related news

  • launch · Jan 20, 2025

    DeepSeek R1 stays as the open-weights RL baseline

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All DeepSeek R1 matchups →|All Qwen: Qwen3 32B matchups →
DeepSeek R1 vs DeepSeek V3 (previous deepseek)DeepSeek R1 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro (next deepseek)DeepSeek V4 Flash vs DeepSeek R1Qwen QwQ 32B vs DeepSeek R1Qwen 3 Max vs DeepSeek R1DeepSeek Coder V2 vs DeepSeek R1