Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 1, 2026
In this head-to-head showdown, MiniMax M2.5 delivers higher overall intelligence and human-preferred responses (Elo 1,478 vs 1,365), while MiniMax M2.5 leads in SWE-bench software engineering benchmarks (75.8%), while DeepSeek Coder V2 is more budget-friendly at $0.28/1M per 1M output tokens, while MiniMax M2.5 provides faster response streaming (90 tok/s). Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.
10 direct benchmark disciplines evaluated across capability, speed, and cost
DeepSeek open-weight Mixture-of-Experts coding model supporting 338 programming languages and 128k context.
MiniMax coding model. Tied near the top of official SWE-bench bash-only in Feb 2026.
Δ 113 Arena Elo pts
90 tok/s
$0.28 / 1M output
Relative percentile scores computed across all active models in the benchmark catalog.
Comparing top Western standard models with China's leading frontier rival across 6 skill dimensions. Tap any spoke or dot to inspect.
Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.
Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy
Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness
Cost per million tokens and max context window length
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder V2 | MiniMax M2.5 | Advantage Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| Preference Elo | +113 | ||
| Coding Elo | +94 | ||
| LiveBench | +5.8% | ||
| SWE-bench | +15.3% | ||
| GPQA Diamond | +6% | ||
| Time to first token | +40 ms | ||
| Output speed | 75 tok/s | 90 tok/s | +15 tok/s |
| Input price | $0.14/1M | $0.3/1M | +$0.16/1M |
| Output price | $0.28/1M | $1.2/1M | +$0.92/1M |
| Context window | +77k |
Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).
DeepSeek Coder V2 is estimated to save $19.40/month ($233/year).
Higher SWE-bench (75.8%).
Lower output list price ($0.28/1M).
Lower TTFT (250 ms).
Larger window (205k).
MiniMax M2.5 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.
| Target Workload | Recommended Pick | Evaluation Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Repo / coding agents | MiniMax M2.5 | Higher SWE-bench (75.8%). |
| High-volume chat | DeepSeek Coder V2 | Lower output list price ($0.28/1M). |
| Voice / low-latency UI | MiniMax M2.5 | Lower TTFT (250 ms). |
| Long-document RAG | MiniMax M2.5 | Larger window (205k). |
| Screenshots / vision | MiniMax M2.5 | MiniMax M2.5 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog. |
No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!
Dynamic OpenGraph banner generated at /compare/deepseek-coder-v2-vs-minimax-m2-5/opengraph-image
Verified Head-to-Head Telemetry