CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
Leaderboard
Models
Compare
Best of & Stacks
Research & News
…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

Theme:
Currency:
  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. DeepSeek Coder V2 vs Ernie 4.5 Turbo

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 1, 2026

DeepSeek Coder V2 vs Ernie 4.5 Turbo benchmark

In this head-to-head showdown, Ernie 4.5 Turbo delivers higher overall intelligence and human-preferred responses (Elo 1,450 vs 1,365), while DeepSeek Coder V2 leads in SWE-bench software engineering benchmarks (60.5%), while DeepSeek Coder V2 is more budget-friendly at $0.28/1M per 1M output tokens, while Ernie 4.5 Turbo provides faster response streaming (95 tok/s). Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.

Executive Comparison Verdict

Bottom Line: Choose Ernie 4.5 Turbo if your priority is peak reasoning, complex code generation, and top preference Elo. Choose DeepSeek Coder V2 if you are optimizing for low latency, high throughput, and cost-efficient API deployment.
Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramXLinkedInReddit

Verified Head-to-Head Advantage Breakdown

9 direct benchmark disciplines evaluated across capability, speed, and cost

DeepSeek Coder V2 (4)Ernie 4.5 Turbo (5)
DeepSeek Coder V2
4 of 9 Wins
✓Coding Elo✓SWE-bench✓Input price✓Output price
Ernie 4.5 Turbo
5 of 9 Wins
✓Preference Elo✓LiveBench✓GPQA Diamond✓Time to first token✓Output speed
DeepSeek
Leads 4 of 9 metrics
DeepSeek Coder V2

DeepSeek open-weight Mixture-of-Experts coding model supporting 338 programming languages and 128k context.

Elo 1,365$0.28/1M out
Baidu
Leads 5 of 9 metrics
Ernie 4.5 Turbo

Baidu current multimodal enterprise foundation model with broad Chinese knowledge.

Elo 1,450$1.2/1M out
Top Rival Showdowns for DeepSeek Coder V2
All Matchups
Compare vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5vs GPT-5vs Gemini 3 Provs Grok 4.6vs Qwen 3 Max
Preference LeaderErnie 4.5 Turbo Wins

Ernie 4.5 Turbo

Δ 85 Arena Elo pts

Throughput LeaderErnie 4.5 Turbo Wins

Ernie 4.5 Turbo

95 tok/s

Value per Dollar LeaderDeepSeek Coder V2 Wins

DeepSeek Coder V2

$0.28 / 1M output

Capability Percentiles

Relative percentile scores computed across all active models in the benchmark catalog.

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Leaders Matchup Capability Radar

Comparing top Western standard models with China's leading frontier rival across 6 skill dimensions. Tap any spoke or dot to inspect.

Tap any node to inspect
Percentile 0–100
Head-to-Head Comparison

Overall Matchup Breakdown

Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.

DeepSeek Coder V2 (4)vsErnie 4.5 Turbo (5)
DeepSeek Coder V2: 4W (44%)Overall: Ernie 4.5 TurboErnie 4.5 Turbo: 5W (56%)
← DeepSeek Coder V21 tiesErnie 4.5 Turbo →
🏆Ernie 4.5 Turbo(3/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Benchmark
DeepSeek Coder V2vsErnie 4.5 Turbo
Preference Elo
1,365vs1,450+85
Coding Elo
1,442vs1,435+7
SWE-bench
60.5%vs57%+3.5%
LiveBench
58.6%vs61%+2.4%
GPQA Diamond
70.2%vs74.5%+4.3%
DeepSeek Coder V2: 2WErnie 4.5 Turbo: 3W
🏆Ernie 4.5 Turbo(2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Benchmark
DeepSeek Coder V2vsErnie 4.5 Turbo
Output speed
75 tok/svs95 tok/s+20 tok/s
Time to first token
290 msvs200 ms+90 ms
DeepSeek Coder V2: 0WErnie 4.5 Turbo: 2W
🏆DeepSeek Coder V2(2/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Benchmark
DeepSeek Coder V2vsErnie 4.5 Turbo
Output price
$0.28/1Mvs$1.2/1M+$0.92/1M
Input price
$0.14/1Mvs$0.3/1M+$0.16/1M
Context window
128kvs128k
DeepSeek Coder V2: 2WErnie 4.5 Turbo: 0W

Side-by-Side Benchmark Matrix

Preference Elo+85
DeepSeek Coder V21,365
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Ernie 4.5 Turbo1,450
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Coding Elo+7
DeepSeek Coder V21,442
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Ernie 4.5 Turbo1,435
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
LiveBench+2.4%
DeepSeek Coder V258.6%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Ernie 4.5 Turbo61%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
SWE-bench+3.5%
DeepSeek Coder V260.5%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Ernie 4.5 Turbo57%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
GPQA Diamond+4.3%
DeepSeek Coder V270.2%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Ernie 4.5 Turbo74.5%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Time to first token+90 ms
DeepSeek Coder V2290 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Ernie 4.5 Turbo200 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Output speed+20 tok/s
DeepSeek Coder V275 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Ernie 4.5 Turbo95 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Input price+$0.16/1M
DeepSeek Coder V2$0.14/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Ernie 4.5 Turbo$0.3/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Output price+$0.92/1M
DeepSeek Coder V2$0.28/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Ernie 4.5 Turbo$1.2/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Context window
DeepSeek Coder V2128k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Ernie 4.5 Turbo128k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder V2Ernie 4.5 TurboAdvantage Delta
Preference Elo
1,365
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
1,450
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+85
Coding Elo
1,442
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
1,435
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+7
LiveBench
58.6%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
61%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+2.4%
SWE-bench
60.5%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
57%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+3.5%
GPQA Diamond
70.2%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
74.5%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+4.3%
Time to first token
290 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
200 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+90 ms
Output speed
75 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
95 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+20 tok/s
Input price
$0.14/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
$0.3/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+$0.16/1M
Output price
$0.28/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
$1.2/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+$0.92/1M
Context window
128k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
128k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
—
Interactive Simulator (USD)

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).

Save up to 68% with DeepSeek Coder V2
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
DeepSeek Coder V2$9.10 / mo
In: $4.9Out: $4.2
Ernie 4.5 Turbo$28.50 / mo
In: $10.5Out: $18
Estimated Cost Delta

DeepSeek Coder V2 is estimated to save $19.40/month ($233/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    DeepSeek Coder V2:Pick DeepSeek Coder V2 when repo-level coding accuracy is the constraint.
  • 2
    Ernie 4.5 Turbo:Pick Ernie 4.5 Turbo when time-to-first-token matters more than peak Elo.
  • 3
    Ernie 4.5 Turbo:Pick Ernie 4.5 Turbo as the default general assistant.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsDeepSeek Coder V2

Higher SWE-bench (60.5%).

High-volume chatDeepSeek Coder V2

Lower output list price ($0.28/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIErnie 4.5 Turbo

Lower TTFT (200 ms).

Long-document RAGDeepSeek Coder V2

Larger window (128k).

Screenshots / visionErnie 4.5 Turbo

Ernie 4.5 Turbo is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsDeepSeek Coder V2Higher SWE-bench (60.5%).
High-volume chatDeepSeek Coder V2Lower output list price ($0.28/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIErnie 4.5 TurboLower TTFT (200 ms).
Long-document RAGDeepSeek Coder V2Larger window (128k).
Screenshots / visionErnie 4.5 TurboErnie 4.5 Turbo is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.
Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Social Share Card Preview

Dynamic OpenGraph banner generated at /compare/deepseek-coder-v2-vs-ernie-4-5/opengraph-image

Save PNG

CompareLLM AI Matrix

Verified Head-to-Head Telemetry

LIVE BENCHMARK
VS
DeepSeek

DeepSeek Coder V2

Elo 1,365
SWE-bench60.5%
Speed (tok/s)75 tok/s
Input / 1M Tokens$0.14/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$0.28/1M
Baidu

Ernie 4.5 Turbo

Elo 1,450
SWE-bench57%
Speed (tok/s)95 tok/s
Input / 1M Tokens$0.3/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$1.2/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, DeepSeek Coder V2 or Ernie 4.5 Turbo?
Ernie 4.5 Turbo has the higher preference Elo in our latest snapshot (1,450). “Better” still depends on coding, price, and latency — see the table.
Which is better at coding, DeepSeek Coder V2 or Ernie 4.5 Turbo?
DeepSeek Coder V2 leads SWE-bench at 60.5% vs 57%. SWE-bench is one harness, not your repo.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
DeepSeek Coder V2 output tokens are $0.28/1M versus $1.2/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, DeepSeek Coder V2 or Ernie 4.5 Turbo?
Ernie 4.5 Turbo has the lower time-to-first-token (200 ms vs 290 ms). Tokens/sec is a separate column if you care about long completions.
Which has the larger context window?
DeepSeek Coder V2 accepts 128k tokens versus 128k.
Can I self-host either model?
DeepSeek Coder V2 is marked open-weights in our catalog. The other side is a closed API. Check the provider license before you ship weights.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. DeepSeek Coder V2 and Ernie 4.5 Turbo Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All DeepSeek Coder V2 matchups →|All Ernie 4.5 Turbo matchups →
DeepSeek Coder V2 vs DeepSeek V3 (next deepseek)Ernie 4.5 Turbo vs Yi-Lightning (previous other)DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Ernie 4.5 TurboDeepSeek V4 Pro vs Ernie 4.5 TurboDeepSeek R1 vs DeepSeek Coder V2Mistral Large 3 vs Ernie 4.5 Turbo