Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 1, 2026
In this head-to-head showdown, Qwen 2.5 Plus delivers higher overall intelligence and human-preferred responses (Elo 1,445 vs 1,344), while Qwen 2.5 Plus leads in SWE-bench software engineering benchmarks (59.2%), while Qwen 2.5 Plus is more budget-friendly at $1/1M per 1M output tokens, while Command A provides faster response streaming (118 tok/s). Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.
9 direct benchmark disciplines evaluated across capability, speed, and cost
Alibaba balanced flagship API model with high-throughput general reasoning.
Δ 101 Arena Elo pts
118 tok/s
$1 / 1M output
Relative percentile scores computed across all active models in the benchmark catalog.
Comparing top Western standard models with China's leading frontier rival across 6 skill dimensions. Tap any spoke or dot to inspect.
Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.
Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy
Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness
Cost per million tokens and max context window length
| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen 2.5 Plus | Advantage Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| Preference Elo | +101 | ||
| Coding Elo | — | — | |
| LiveBench | +7.3% | ||
| SWE-bench | +16.6% | ||
| GPQA Diamond | +9.8% | ||
| Time to first token | +5 ms | ||
| Output speed | 118 tok/s | 110 tok/s | +8 tok/s |
| Input price | $2.5/1M | $0.25/1M | +$2.25/1M |
| Output price | +$9/1M | ||
| Context window | +128k |
Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).
Qwen 2.5 Plus is estimated to save $213.75/month ($2,565/year).
Higher SWE-bench (59.2%).
Lower output list price ($1/1M).
Lower TTFT (175 ms).
Larger window (256k).
Qwen 2.5 Plus is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.
| Target Workload | Recommended Pick | Evaluation Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Repo / coding agents | Qwen 2.5 Plus | Higher SWE-bench (59.2%). |
| High-volume chat | Qwen 2.5 Plus | Lower output list price ($1/1M). |
| Voice / low-latency UI | Command A | Lower TTFT (175 ms). |
| Long-document RAG | Command A | Larger window (256k). |
| Screenshots / vision | Qwen 2.5 Plus | Qwen 2.5 Plus is the side marked multimodal in the catalog. |
No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!
Dynamic OpenGraph banner generated at /compare/command-a-vs-qwen-2-5-plus/opengraph-image
Verified Head-to-Head Telemetry