CompareLLM.ai
Live
Leaderboard
Models
Compare
Best of & Stacks
Research & News
…
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

Theme:
Currency:
  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. Command A vs OpenAI o1

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 1, 2026

Command A vs OpenAI o1 benchmark

In this head-to-head showdown, OpenAI o1 delivers higher overall intelligence and human-preferred responses (Elo 1,512 vs 1,344), while OpenAI o1 leads in SWE-bench software engineering benchmarks (48.9%), while Command A is more budget-friendly at $10/1M per 1M output tokens. Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.

Executive Comparison Verdict

Bottom Line: Choose OpenAI o1 if your priority is peak reasoning, complex code generation, and top preference Elo. Choose Command A if you are optimizing for low latency, high throughput, and cost-efficient API deployment.
Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramXLinkedInReddit

Verified Head-to-Head Advantage Breakdown

9 direct benchmark disciplines evaluated across capability, speed, and cost

Command A (5)OpenAI o1 (4)
Command A
5 of 9 Wins
✓Time to first token✓Output speed✓Input price✓Output price✓Context window
OpenAI o1
4 of 9 Wins
✓Preference Elo✓LiveBench✓SWE-bench✓GPQA Diamond
Cohere
Leads 5 of 9 metrics
Command A

Cohere enterprise RAG and tool-use model.

Elo 1,344$10/1M out
OpenAI
Leads 4 of 9 metrics
OpenAI o1

OpenAI pioneer reasoning foundation model designed for complex science, math, and multi-step reasoning.

Elo 1,512$60/1M out

OpenAI o1 Thinking Depth & Cost Scaler

Model B

Simulate accuracy gains vs added response time & token cost

Mode: Medium (Standard)

Reasoning models “think before answering” by generating internal reasoning tokens. Higher effort improves math, coding, and logic accuracy, but increases response delay and token costs.

Thinking Delay
420 ms
Standard speed
Reasoning Depth
~1,500
Internal tokens
Cost / 1k Calls
$115.50
4.5× standard bill
Accuracy Boost
+4.5% accuracy
STEM & SWE-bench
Top Rival Showdowns for Command A
All Matchups
Compare vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5vs GPT-5vs Gemini 3 Provs Grok 4.6vs DeepSeek V4 Pro
Preference LeaderOpenAI o1 Wins

OpenAI o1

Δ 168 Arena Elo pts

Throughput LeaderCommand A Wins

Command A

118 tok/s

Value per Dollar LeaderCommand A Wins

Command A

$10 / 1M output

Capability Percentiles

Relative percentile scores computed across all active models in the benchmark catalog.

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Leaders Matchup Capability Radar

Comparing top Western standard models with China's leading frontier rival across 6 skill dimensions. Tap any spoke or dot to inspect.

Tap any node to inspect
Percentile 0–100
Head-to-Head Comparison

Overall Matchup Breakdown

Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.

Command A (5)vsOpenAI o1 (5)
Command A: 5W (50%)Overall: Even matchupOpenAI o1: 5W (50%)
← Command AOpenAI o1 →
🏆OpenAI o1(5/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Benchmark
Command AvsOpenAI o1
Preference Elo
1,344vs1,512+168
Coding Elo
—vs1,485
SWE-bench
42.6%vs48.9%+6.3%
LiveBench
56.2%vs65.4%+9.2%
GPQA Diamond
66%vs78%+12%
Command A: 0WOpenAI o1: 5W
🏆Command A(2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Benchmark
Command AvsOpenAI o1
Output speed
118 tok/svs45 tok/s+73 tok/s
Time to first token
175 msvs420 ms+245 ms
Command A: 2WOpenAI o1: 0W
🏆Command A(3/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Benchmark
Command AvsOpenAI o1
Output price
$10/1Mvs$60/1M+$50/1M
Input price
$2.5/1Mvs$15/1M+$12.5/1M
Context window
256kvs200k+56k
Command A: 3WOpenAI o1: 0W

Side-by-Side Benchmark Matrix

Preference Elo+168
Command A1,344
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
OpenAI o11,512
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Coding Elo
Command A—
OpenAI o11,485
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
LiveBench+9.2%
Command A56.2%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
OpenAI o165.4%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
SWE-bench+6.3%
Command A42.6%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
OpenAI o148.9%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
GPQA Diamond+12%
Command A66%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
OpenAI o178%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Time to first token+245 ms
Command A175 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
OpenAI o1420 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Output speed+73 tok/s
Command A118 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
OpenAI o145 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Input price+$12.5/1M
Command A$2.5/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
OpenAI o1$15/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Output price+$50/1M
Command A$10/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
OpenAI o1$60/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Context window+56k
Command A256k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
OpenAI o1200k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
BenchmarkCommand AOpenAI o1Advantage Delta
Preference Elo
1,344
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
1,512
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+168
Coding Elo—
1,485
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
—
LiveBench
56.2%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
65.4%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+9.2%
SWE-bench
42.6%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
48.9%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+6.3%
GPQA Diamond
66%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
78%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+12%
Time to first token
175 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
420 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+245 ms
Output speed
118 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
45 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+73 tok/s
Input price
$2.5/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
$15/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+$12.5/1M
Output price
$10/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
$60/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+$50/1M
Context window
256k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
200k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+56k
Interactive Simulator (USD)

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).

Save up to 83% with Command A
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
Command A$237.50 / mo
In: $87.5Out: $150
OpenAI o1$1,425.00 / mo
In: $525Out: $900
Estimated Cost Delta

Command A is estimated to save $1,187.50/month ($14,250/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    OpenAI o1:Pick OpenAI o1 when repo-level coding accuracy is the constraint.
  • 2
    Command A:Pick Command A when you are optimizing output cost.
  • 3
    Command A:Pick Command A when time-to-first-token matters more than peak Elo.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsOpenAI o1

Higher SWE-bench (48.9%).

High-volume chatCommand A

Lower output list price ($10/1M).

Voice / low-latency UICommand A

Lower TTFT (175 ms).

Long-document RAGCommand A

Larger window (256k).

Screenshots / visionOpenAI o1

OpenAI o1 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsOpenAI o1Higher SWE-bench (48.9%).
High-volume chatCommand ALower output list price ($10/1M).
Voice / low-latency UICommand ALower TTFT (175 ms).
Long-document RAGCommand ALarger window (256k).
Screenshots / visionOpenAI o1OpenAI o1 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

View all news
launchMar 13, 2025

Command A: Cohere’s enterprise RAG and tool-use row

Mar 2025. RAG and tools, not a frontier Elo play. Listed so “command a benchmark” has a sourced page.

Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Social Share Card Preview

Dynamic OpenGraph banner generated at /compare/command-a-vs-o1/opengraph-image

Save PNG

CompareLLM AI Matrix

Verified Head-to-Head Telemetry

LIVE BENCHMARK
VS
Cohere

Command A

Elo 1,344
SWE-bench42.6%
Speed (tok/s)118 tok/s
Input / 1M Tokens$2.5/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$10/1M
OpenAI

OpenAI o1

Elo 1,512
SWE-bench48.9%
Speed (tok/s)45 tok/s
Input / 1M Tokens$15/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$60/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Command A or OpenAI o1?
OpenAI o1 has the higher preference Elo in our latest snapshot (1,512). “Better” still depends on coding, price, and latency — see the table.
Which is better at coding, Command A or OpenAI o1?
OpenAI o1 leads SWE-bench at 48.9% vs 42.6%. SWE-bench is one harness, not your repo.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
Command A output tokens are $10/1M versus $60/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, Command A or OpenAI o1?
Command A has the lower time-to-first-token (175 ms vs 420 ms). Tokens/sec is a separate column if you care about long completions.
Which has the larger context window?
Command A accepts 256k tokens versus 200k.
Can I self-host either model?
Neither model is marked open-weights here. You are comparing hosted APIs.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Command A and OpenAI o1 Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Related news

  • launch · Mar 13, 2025

    Command A: Cohere’s enterprise RAG and tool-use row

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All Command A matchups →|All OpenAI o1 matchups →
OpenAI o1 vs GPT-4o (previous gpt-flagship)OpenAI o1 vs GPT-4.5 Orion (next gpt-flagship)GPT-5 vs OpenAI o1OpenAI o3-mini vs OpenAI o1GPT-5.6 Sol vs OpenAI o1GPT-5.6 Terra vs OpenAI o1