CompareLLM.ai
Live
Leaderboard
Models
Compare
Best of & Stacks
Research & News
…
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

Theme:
Currency:
  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. Command A vs Kimi K3

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 1, 2026

Command A vs Kimi K3 benchmark

In this head-to-head showdown, Kimi K3 delivers higher overall intelligence and human-preferred responses (Elo 1,528 vs 1,344), while Kimi K3 leads in SWE-bench software engineering benchmarks (73.8%), while Kimi K3 is more budget-friendly at $2.5/1M per 1M output tokens, while Command A provides faster response streaming (118 tok/s). Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.

Executive Comparison Verdict

Bottom Line: Kimi K3 holds the advantage over Command A in overall benchmark performance and human evaluation rankings. Choose Kimi K3 for demanding workloads, or review the breakdown below to compare coding and pricing metrics.
Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramXLinkedInReddit

Verified Head-to-Head Advantage Breakdown

9 direct benchmark disciplines evaluated across capability, speed, and cost

Command A (2)Kimi K3 (7)
Command A
2 of 9 Wins
✓Time to first token✓Output speed
Kimi K3
7 of 9 Wins
✓Preference Elo✓LiveBench✓SWE-bench✓GPQA Diamond✓Input price✓Output price✓Context window
Cohere
Leads 2 of 9 metrics
Command A

Cohere enterprise RAG and tool-use model.

Elo 1,344$10/1M out
Moonshot
Leads 7 of 9 metrics
Kimi K3

Moonshot AI frontier flagship reasoning and agent swarm model with 256k context and top-tier SWE-bench coding capability.

Elo 1,528$2.5/1M out

Kimi K3 Thinking Depth & Cost Scaler

Model B

Simulate accuracy gains vs added response time & token cost

Mode: Medium (Deep Reasoning)

Reasoning models “think before answering” by generating internal reasoning tokens. Higher effort improves math, coding, and logic accuracy, but increases response delay and token costs.

Thinking Delay
290 ms
Standard speed
Reasoning Depth
~2,500
Internal tokens
Cost / 1k Calls
$7.30
7.0× standard bill
Accuracy Boost
+5.5% accuracy
STEM & SWE-bench
Top Rival Showdowns for Command A
All Matchups
Compare vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5vs GPT-5vs Gemini 3 Provs Grok 4.6vs DeepSeek V4 Pro
Preference LeaderKimi K3 Wins

Kimi K3

Δ 184 Arena Elo pts

Throughput LeaderCommand A Wins

Command A

118 tok/s

Value per Dollar LeaderKimi K3 Wins

Kimi K3

$2.5 / 1M output

Capability Percentiles

Relative percentile scores computed across all active models in the benchmark catalog.

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Leaders Matchup Capability Radar

Comparing top Western standard models with China's leading frontier rival across 6 skill dimensions. Tap any spoke or dot to inspect.

Tap any node to inspect
Percentile 0–100
Head-to-Head Comparison

Overall Matchup Breakdown

Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.

Command A (2)vsKimi K3 (8)
Command A: 2W (20%)Overall: Kimi K3Kimi K3: 8W (80%)
← Command AKimi K3 →
🏆Kimi K3(5/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Benchmark
Command AvsKimi K3
Preference Elo
1,344vs1,528+184
Coding Elo
—vs1,535
SWE-bench
42.6%vs73.8%+31.2%
LiveBench
56.2%vs69.5%+13.3%
GPQA Diamond
66%vs88.4%+22.4%
Command A: 0WKimi K3: 5W
🏆Command A(2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Benchmark
Command AvsKimi K3
Output speed
118 tok/svs68 tok/s+50 tok/s
Time to first token
175 msvs290 ms+115 ms
Command A: 2WKimi K3: 0W
🏆Kimi K3(3/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Benchmark
Command AvsKimi K3
Output price
$10/1Mvs$2.5/1M+$7.5/1M
Input price
$2.5/1Mvs$0.6/1M+$1.9/1M
Context window
256kvs262k+6k
Command A: 0WKimi K3: 3W

Side-by-Side Benchmark Matrix

Preference Elo+184
Command A1,344
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Kimi K31,528
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Coding Elo
Command A—
Kimi K31,535
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
LiveBench+13.3%
Command A56.2%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Kimi K369.5%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
SWE-bench+31.2%
Command A42.6%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Kimi K373.8%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
GPQA Diamond+22.4%
Command A66%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Kimi K388.4%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Time to first token+115 ms
Command A175 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Kimi K3290 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Output speed+50 tok/s
Command A118 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Kimi K368 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Input price+$1.9/1M
Command A$2.5/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Kimi K3$0.6/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Output price+$7.5/1M
Command A$10/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Kimi K3$2.5/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Context window+6k
Command A256k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Kimi K3262k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
BenchmarkCommand AKimi K3Advantage Delta
Preference Elo
1,344
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
1,528
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+184
Coding Elo—
1,535
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
—
LiveBench
56.2%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
69.5%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+13.3%
SWE-bench
42.6%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
73.8%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+31.2%
GPQA Diamond
66%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
88.4%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+22.4%
Time to first token
175 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
290 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+115 ms
Output speed
118 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
68 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+50 tok/s
Input price
$2.5/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
$0.6/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+$1.9/1M
Output price
$10/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
$2.5/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+$7.5/1M
Context window
256k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
262k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+6k
Interactive Simulator (USD)

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).

Save up to 75% with Kimi K3
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
Command A$237.50 / mo
In: $87.5Out: $150
Kimi K3$58.50 / mo
In: $21Out: $37.5
Estimated Cost Delta

Kimi K3 is estimated to save $179.00/month ($2,148/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    Kimi K3:Pick Kimi K3 when repo-level coding accuracy is the constraint.
  • 2
    Command A:Pick Command A when time-to-first-token matters more than peak Elo.
  • 3
    Kimi K3:Pick Kimi K3 as the default general assistant.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsKimi K3

Higher SWE-bench (73.8%).

High-volume chatKimi K3

Lower output list price ($2.5/1M).

Voice / low-latency UICommand A

Lower TTFT (175 ms).

Long-document RAGKimi K3

Larger window (262k).

Screenshots / visionKimi K3

Kimi K3 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsKimi K3Higher SWE-bench (73.8%).
High-volume chatKimi K3Lower output list price ($2.5/1M).
Voice / low-latency UICommand ALower TTFT (175 ms).
Long-document RAGKimi K3Larger window (262k).
Screenshots / visionKimi K3Kimi K3 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

View all news
launchJun 8, 2026

Kimi K3: Moonshot’s long-context open-weight competitive row

Jun 2026. The Kimi vs GPT hub remaps to the top Moonshot Elo vs top OpenAI Elo.

launchMar 13, 2025

Command A: Cohere’s enterprise RAG and tool-use row

Mar 2025. RAG and tools, not a frontier Elo play. Listed so “command a benchmark” has a sourced page.

Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Social Share Card Preview

Dynamic OpenGraph banner generated at /compare/command-a-vs-kimi-k3/opengraph-image

Save PNG

CompareLLM AI Matrix

Verified Head-to-Head Telemetry

LIVE BENCHMARK
VS
Cohere

Command A

Elo 1,344
SWE-bench42.6%
Speed (tok/s)118 tok/s
Input / 1M Tokens$2.5/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$10/1M
Moonshot

Kimi K3

Elo 1,528
SWE-bench73.8%
Speed (tok/s)68 tok/s
Input / 1M Tokens$0.6/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$2.5/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Command A or Kimi K3?
Kimi K3 has the higher preference Elo in our latest snapshot (1,528). “Better” still depends on coding, price, and latency — see the table.
Which is better at coding, Command A or Kimi K3?
Kimi K3 leads SWE-bench at 73.8% vs 42.6%. SWE-bench is one harness, not your repo.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
Kimi K3 output tokens are $2.5/1M versus $10/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, Command A or Kimi K3?
Command A has the lower time-to-first-token (175 ms vs 290 ms). Tokens/sec is a separate column if you care about long completions.
Which has the larger context window?
Kimi K3 accepts 262k tokens versus 256k.
Can I self-host either model?
Neither model is marked open-weights here. You are comparing hosted APIs.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Command A and Kimi K3 Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Related news

  • launch · Jun 8, 2026

    Kimi K3: Moonshot’s long-context open-weight competitive row

  • launch · Mar 13, 2025

    Command A: Cohere’s enterprise RAG and tool-use row

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All Command A matchups →|All Kimi K3 matchups →
Kimi K3 vs Kimi K2.5 Max (previous kimi)Kimi Chat 1.5 vs Command AKimi K2 vs Kimi K3Mistral Large 3 vs Kimi K3Doubao Pro 1.5 vs Kimi K3Yi-Lightning vs Kimi K3