CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
Explore
Compare
Decide
Track
Learn
…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

Theme:
Currency:
  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. Claude Opus 5 vs MiniMax: MiniMax M1

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 17, 2026noindex (thin pair)

Claude Opus 5 vs MiniMax: MiniMax M1 benchmark

In this head-to-head showdown, MiniMax: MiniMax M1 is more budget-friendly at $2.2/1M per 1M output tokens. Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.

Executive Comparison Verdict

Bottom Line: Choose Claude Opus 5 if your priority is peak reasoning, complex code generation, and top preference Elo. Choose MiniMax: MiniMax M1 if you are optimizing for low latency, high throughput, and cost-efficient API deployment.
Share Analysis:Share:
WhatsAppTelegramXLinkedIn
Executive Verdict Summary

MiniMax: MiniMax M1 holds empirical advantage (2 of 2 metrics)

Coding / SWESWE-bench
Claude Opus 5Top code solve rate
ReasoningGPQA / Live
Claude Opus 5Top logical accuracy
Best Value$/1M Tok
MiniMax: MiniMax M1Lowest API billing cost
Speed / TokTok/Sec
Claude Opus 5Fastest stream rate

Verified Advantage Breakdown

2 benchmarks evaluated across capability, speed, and cost

Claude Opus 5 (0)MiniMax: MiniMax M1 (2)
Claude Opus 5
0 of 2 Wins
Competitive baseline across remaining benchmarks
MiniMax: MiniMax M1
2 of 2 Wins
✓Input price✓Output price
Anthropic
Claude Opus 5

Anthropic current default flagship. Official API $5/$25 per 1M tokens and a 1M context window (Anthropic, Jul 24 2026).

Elo 1,624In: $10 · Out: $50/1M
MiniMax
Leads 2 of 2
MiniMax: MiniMax M1

Auto-discovered from OpenRouter (minimax/minimax-m1). Preview until a second source matches.

In: $0.55 · Out: $2.2/1M

Claude Opus 5 Thinking Depth & Cost Scaler

Model A

Simulate accuracy gains vs added response time & token cost

Mode: Medium (16k budget)

Reasoning models “think before answering” by generating internal reasoning tokens. Higher effort improves math, coding, and logic accuracy, but increases response delay and token costs.

Delay
310 ms
Standard
CoT Tokens
~3,200
Internal reasoning
Cost / 1k
$180.00
9.0× base bill
Accuracy Boost
+5.2%
STEM & Logic
Top Rival Showdowns for Claude Opus 5
All Matchups
Compare vs:vs GPT-5vs Gemini 3 Provs Grok 4.6vs DeepSeek V4 Provs Qwen 3 Max
Preference Leader

No shared data

Single model data

Throughput Leader

No shared data

No latency data

Value per Dollar LeaderMiniMax: MiniMax M1 Wins

MiniMax: MiniMax M1

$2.2 / 1M output

Capability Percentiles

Relative percentile scores computed across all active models in the benchmark catalog.

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Leaders Matchup Capability Radar

Comparing top standard models across 6 key capability dimensions. Tap any spoke or dot to inspect.

Tap any node to inspect
0–100 %ile

Overall Matchup Breakdown

Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.

Claude Opus 5 (7)vsMiniMax: MiniMax M1 (2)
Claude Opus 5: 7W (78%)Overall: Claude Opus 5MiniMax: MiniMax M1: 2W (22%)
← Claude Opus 51 tiesMiniMax: MiniMax M1 →
🏆Claude Opus 5 Leads(5/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Benchmark
Claude Opus 5vsMiniMax: MiniMax M1
Preference Elo
1,624vs—
Coding Elo
1,618vs—
SWE-bench
79.2%vs—
LiveBench
74.8%vs—
GPQA Diamond
87.1%vs—
Claude Opus 5: 5WMiniMax: MiniMax M1: 0W
🏆Claude Opus 5 Leads(2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Benchmark
Claude Opus 5vsMiniMax: MiniMax M1
Output speed
72 tok/svs—
Time to first token
310 msvs—
Claude Opus 5: 2WMiniMax: MiniMax M1: 0W
🏆MiniMax: MiniMax M1 Leads(2/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Benchmark
Claude Opus 5vsMiniMax: MiniMax M1
Output price
$50/1Mvs$2.2/1M+$47.8/1M
Input price
$10/1Mvs$0.55/1M+$9.45/1M
Context window
1Mvs1M
Claude Opus 5: 0WMiniMax: MiniMax M1: 2W

Side-by-Side Benchmark Matrix

Claude Opus 5MiniMax: MiniMax M1
Preference Elo
Claude Opus 51,624
MiniMax: MiniMax M1—
Coding Elo
Claude Opus 51,618
MiniMax: MiniMax M1—
LiveBench
Claude Opus 574.8%
MiniMax: MiniMax M1—
SWE-bench
Claude Opus 579.2%
MiniMax: MiniMax M1—
GPQA Diamond
Claude Opus 587.1%
MiniMax: MiniMax M1—
Time to first token
Claude Opus 5310 ms
MiniMax: MiniMax M1—
Output speed
Claude Opus 572 tok/s
MiniMax: MiniMax M1—
Input priceMiniMax: MiniMax M1 +$9.45/1M
Claude Opus 5$10/1M
MiniMax: MiniMax M1$0.55/1M
Output priceMiniMax: MiniMax M1 +$47.8/1M
Claude Opus 5$50/1M
MiniMax: MiniMax M1$2.2/1M
Context window
Claude Opus 51M
MiniMax: MiniMax M11M
BenchmarkClaude Opus 5MiniMax: MiniMax M1Advantage Delta
Preference Elo
1,624
lmarena · Aug 16, 2026
——
Coding Elo
1,618
lmarena · Aug 16, 2026
——
LiveBench
74.8%
livebench · Aug 16, 2026
——
SWE-bench
79.2%
swebench · Aug 16, 2026
——
GPQA Diamond
87.1%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
——
Time to first token
310 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
——
Output speed
72 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
——
Input price
$10/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
$0.55/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
+$9.45/1M
Output price
$50/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
$2.2/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
+$47.8/1M
Context window
1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
—

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).

Save 95% with MiniMax: MiniMax M1
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
Claude Opus 5$1,100.00 / mo
In: $350Out: $750
MiniMax: MiniMax M1$52.25 / mo
In: $19.25Out: $33
Estimated Cost Delta

MiniMax: MiniMax M1 is estimated to save $1,047.75/month ($12,573/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    MiniMax: MiniMax M1:Pick MiniMax: MiniMax M1 when you are optimizing output cost.
  • 2
    Claude Opus 5:Pick Claude Opus 5 for million-token RAG or long-document jobs.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsinsufficient data

Need SWE-bench on both sides.

High-volume chatMiniMax: MiniMax M1

Lower output list price ($2.2/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient data

Need TTFT on both sides.

Long-document RAGClaude Opus 5

Larger window (1M).

Screenshots / visionClaude Opus 5

Claude Opus 5 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsinsufficient dataNeed SWE-bench on both sides.
High-volume chatMiniMax: MiniMax M1Lower output list price ($2.2/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient dataNeed TTFT on both sides.
Long-document RAGClaude Opus 5Larger window (1M).
Screenshots / visionClaude Opus 5Claude Opus 5 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

View all news
compareAug 10, 2026

Sonnet vs Opus in 2026: same family, different invoice

Usually Sonnet 5 vs Opus 5. Coding delta versus output $/1M. The workhorse question.

compareJul 24, 2026

Claude vs Gemini: coding, Elo, and output price — not a brand mashup

Top Anthropic vs top Google. Usually Opus 5 vs 3.6 Pro. Two different invoices.

compareJul 24, 2026

Claude vs GPT benchmark: this hub always remaps to the current Elo leaders

Not a frozen 2025 article. Today that is usually Opus 5 vs GPT-5.6 Sol. Dated cells, not a brand fight.

launchJul 24, 2026

Claude Opus 5 is Anthropic’s default flagship — how to read it on CompareLLM

Jul 24 2026 official API at $5/$25 and a 1M window. Preference Elo is taste, not a coding exam.

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Social Share Card Preview

Dynamic OpenGraph banner generated at /compare/claude-opus-5-vs-minimax-m1/opengraph-image

Save PNG

CompareLLM AI Matrix

Verified Head-to-Head Telemetry

LIVE BENCHMARK
VS
Anthropic

Claude Opus 5

Elo 1,624
SWE-bench79.2%
Speed (tok/s)72 tok/s
Input / 1M Tokens$10/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$50/1M
MiniMax

MiniMax: MiniMax M1

Elo n/a
SWE-bench—
Speed (tok/s)1M
Input / 1M Tokens$0.55/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$2.2/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Claude Opus 5 or MiniMax: MiniMax M1?
We do not have preference Elo for both models, so we do not declare an overall winner. Compare the metrics that exist.
Which is better at coding, Claude Opus 5 or MiniMax: MiniMax M1?
SWE-bench is missing for at least one model, so we do not rank coding from a single number.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
MiniMax: MiniMax M1 output tokens are $2.2/1M versus $50/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, Claude Opus 5 or MiniMax: MiniMax M1?
We do not have TTFT for both models.
Which has the larger context window?
Claude Opus 5 accepts 1M tokens versus 1M.
Can I self-host either model?
Neither model is marked open-weights here. You are comparing hosted APIs.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Claude Opus 5 and MiniMax: MiniMax M1 Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Related news

  • compare · Aug 10, 2026

    Sonnet vs Opus in 2026: same family, different invoice

  • compare · Jul 24, 2026

    Claude vs Gemini: coding, Elo, and output price — not a brand mashup

  • compare · Jul 24, 2026

    Claude vs GPT benchmark: this hub always remaps to the current Elo leaders

  • launch · Jul 24, 2026

    Claude Opus 5 is Anthropic’s default flagship — how to read it on CompareLLM

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All Claude Opus 5 matchups →|All MiniMax: MiniMax M1 matchups →
Claude Opus 5 vs Claude Opus 4.8 (previous opus)Claude Fable 5 vs Claude Opus 5Claude Opus 4.6 vs Claude Opus 5Claude Opus 4.5 vs Claude Opus 5Claude Sonnet 5 vs Claude Opus 5Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Claude Opus 5