Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 1, 2026
In this head-to-head showdown, OpenAI o3-mini delivers higher overall intelligence and human-preferred responses (Elo 1,560 vs 1,490), while OpenAI o3-mini leads in SWE-bench software engineering benchmarks (78.5%), while OpenAI o3-mini is more budget-friendly at $4.4/1M per 1M output tokens. Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.
9 direct benchmark disciplines evaluated across capability, speed, and cost
First Claude 4 Opus generation. Baseline for opus 4 vs opus 5.
OpenAI cost-efficient reasoning model with adjustable thinking effort and top coding benchmark scores.
Simulate accuracy gains vs added response time & token cost
Reasoning models “think before answering” by generating internal reasoning tokens. Higher effort improves math, coding, and logic accuracy, but increases response delay and token costs.
Δ 70 Arena Elo pts
92 tok/s
$4.4 / 1M output
Relative percentile scores computed across all active models in the benchmark catalog.
Comparing top Western standard models with China's leading frontier rival across 6 skill dimensions. Tap any spoke or dot to inspect.
Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.
Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy
Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness
Cost per million tokens and max context window length
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4 | OpenAI o3-mini | Advantage Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| Preference Elo | +70 | ||
| Coding Elo | +83 | ||
| LiveBench | +5.6% | ||
| SWE-bench | +6% | ||
| GPQA Diamond | +6.8% | ||
| Time to first token | +100 ms | ||
| Output speed | 58 tok/s | 92 tok/s | +34 tok/s |
| Input price | $1.1/1M | +$13.9/1M | |
| Output price | $4.4/1M | +$70.6/1M | |
| Context window | — |
Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).
OpenAI o3-mini is estimated to save $1,545.50/month ($18,546/year).
Higher SWE-bench (78.5%).
Lower output list price ($4.4/1M).
Lower TTFT (290 ms).
Larger window (200k).
Claude Opus 4 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.
| Target Workload | Recommended Pick | Evaluation Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Repo / coding agents | OpenAI o3-mini | Higher SWE-bench (78.5%). |
| High-volume chat | OpenAI o3-mini | Lower output list price ($4.4/1M). |
| Voice / low-latency UI | OpenAI o3-mini | Lower TTFT (290 ms). |
| Long-document RAG | Claude Opus 4 | Larger window (200k). |
| Screenshots / vision | Claude Opus 4 | Claude Opus 4 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog. |
No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!
Dynamic OpenGraph banner generated at /compare/claude-opus-4-vs-o3-mini/opengraph-image
Verified Head-to-Head Telemetry