CompareLLM.ai
Live
Leaderboard
Models
Compare
Best of & Stacks
Research & News
…
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

Theme:
Currency:
  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. Claude Opus 4 vs MiniMax M2.5

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 1, 2026

Claude Opus 4 vs MiniMax M2.5 benchmark

In this head-to-head showdown, Claude Opus 4 delivers higher overall intelligence and human-preferred responses (Elo 1,490 vs 1,478), while MiniMax M2.5 leads in SWE-bench software engineering benchmarks (75.8%), while MiniMax M2.5 is more budget-friendly at $1.2/1M per 1M output tokens. Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.

Executive Comparison Verdict

Bottom Line: Choose Claude Opus 4 if your priority is peak reasoning, complex code generation, and top preference Elo. Choose MiniMax M2.5 if you are optimizing for low latency, high throughput, and cost-efficient API deployment.
Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramXLinkedInReddit

Verified Head-to-Head Advantage Breakdown

10 direct benchmark disciplines evaluated across capability, speed, and cost

Claude Opus 4 (3)MiniMax M2.5 (7)
Claude Opus 4
3 of 10 Wins
✓Preference Elo✓LiveBench✓GPQA Diamond
MiniMax M2.5
7 of 10 Wins
✓Coding Elo✓SWE-bench✓Time to first token✓Output speed✓Input price✓Output price✓Context window
Anthropic
Leads 3 of 10 metrics
Claude Opus 4

First Claude 4 Opus generation. Baseline for opus 4 vs opus 5.

Elo 1,490$75/1M out
MiniMax
Leads 7 of 10 metrics
MiniMax M2.5

MiniMax coding model. Tied near the top of official SWE-bench bash-only in Feb 2026.

Elo 1,478$1.2/1M out
Top Rival Showdowns for Claude Opus 4
All Matchups
Compare vs:vs GPT-5vs Gemini 3 Provs Grok 4.6vs DeepSeek V4 Provs Qwen 3 Max
Preference LeaderClaude Opus 4 Wins

Claude Opus 4

Δ 12 Arena Elo pts

Throughput LeaderMiniMax M2.5 Wins

MiniMax M2.5

90 tok/s

Value per Dollar LeaderMiniMax M2.5 Wins

MiniMax M2.5

$1.2 / 1M output

Capability Percentiles

Relative percentile scores computed across all active models in the benchmark catalog.

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Leaders Matchup Capability Radar

Comparing top Western standard models with China's leading frontier rival across 6 skill dimensions. Tap any spoke or dot to inspect.

Tap any node to inspect
Percentile 0–100
Head-to-Head Comparison

Overall Matchup Breakdown

Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.

Claude Opus 4 (3)vsMiniMax M2.5 (7)
Claude Opus 4: 3W (30%)Overall: MiniMax M2.5MiniMax M2.5: 7W (70%)
← Claude Opus 4MiniMax M2.5 →
🏆Claude Opus 4(3/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Benchmark
Claude Opus 4vsMiniMax M2.5
Preference Elo
1,490vs1,478+12
Coding Elo
1,502vs1,536+34
SWE-bench
72.5%vs75.8%+3.3%
LiveBench
66.8%vs64.4%+2.4%
GPQA Diamond
80.4%vs76.2%+4.2%
Claude Opus 4: 3WMiniMax M2.5: 2W
🏆MiniMax M2.5(2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Benchmark
Claude Opus 4vsMiniMax M2.5
Output speed
58 tok/svs90 tok/s+32 tok/s
Time to first token
390 msvs250 ms+140 ms
Claude Opus 4: 0WMiniMax M2.5: 2W
🏆MiniMax M2.5(3/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Benchmark
Claude Opus 4vsMiniMax M2.5
Output price
$75/1Mvs$1.2/1M+$73.8/1M
Input price
$15/1Mvs$0.3/1M+$14.7/1M
Context window
200kvs205k+5k
Claude Opus 4: 0WMiniMax M2.5: 3W

Side-by-Side Benchmark Matrix

Preference Elo+12
Claude Opus 41,490
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
MiniMax M2.51,478
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Coding Elo+34
Claude Opus 41,502
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
MiniMax M2.51,536
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
LiveBench+2.4%
Claude Opus 466.8%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
MiniMax M2.564.4%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
SWE-bench+3.3%
Claude Opus 472.5%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
MiniMax M2.575.8%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
GPQA Diamond+4.2%
Claude Opus 480.4%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
MiniMax M2.576.2%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Time to first token+140 ms
Claude Opus 4390 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
MiniMax M2.5250 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Output speed+32 tok/s
Claude Opus 458 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
MiniMax M2.590 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Input price+$14.7/1M
Claude Opus 4$15/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
MiniMax M2.5$0.3/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Output price+$73.8/1M
Claude Opus 4$75/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
MiniMax M2.5$1.2/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Context window+5k
Claude Opus 4200k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
MiniMax M2.5205k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4MiniMax M2.5Advantage Delta
Preference Elo
1,490
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
1,478
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+12
Coding Elo
1,502
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
1,536
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+34
LiveBench
66.8%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
64.4%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+2.4%
SWE-bench
72.5%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
75.8%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+3.3%
GPQA Diamond
80.4%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
76.2%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+4.2%
Time to first token
390 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
250 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+140 ms
Output speed
58 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
90 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+32 tok/s
Input price
$15/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
$0.3/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+$14.7/1M
Output price
$75/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
$1.2/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+$73.8/1M
Context window
200k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
205k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+5k
Interactive Simulator (USD)

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).

Save up to 98% with MiniMax M2.5
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
Claude Opus 4$1,650.00 / mo
In: $525Out: $1,125
MiniMax M2.5$28.50 / mo
In: $10.5Out: $18
Estimated Cost Delta

MiniMax M2.5 is estimated to save $1,621.50/month ($19,458/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    MiniMax M2.5:Pick MiniMax M2.5 when repo-level coding accuracy is the constraint.
  • 2
    MiniMax M2.5:Pick MiniMax M2.5 when time-to-first-token matters more than peak Elo.
  • 3
    Claude Opus 4:Pick Claude Opus 4 as the default general assistant.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsMiniMax M2.5

Higher SWE-bench (75.8%).

High-volume chatMiniMax M2.5

Lower output list price ($1.2/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIMiniMax M2.5

Lower TTFT (250 ms).

Long-document RAGMiniMax M2.5

Larger window (205k).

Screenshots / visionClaude Opus 4

Claude Opus 4 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsMiniMax M2.5Higher SWE-bench (75.8%).
High-volume chatMiniMax M2.5Lower output list price ($1.2/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIMiniMax M2.5Lower TTFT (250 ms).
Long-document RAGMiniMax M2.5Larger window (205k).
Screenshots / visionClaude Opus 4Claude Opus 4 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

View all news
launchFeb 12, 2026

MiniMax M2.5: the Feb 2026 SWE-bench specialist still on the board

Tied near the top of official SWE-bench bash-only in Feb 2026. Coding lists should still see it.

Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Social Share Card Preview

Dynamic OpenGraph banner generated at /compare/claude-opus-4-vs-minimax-m2-5/opengraph-image

Save PNG

CompareLLM AI Matrix

Verified Head-to-Head Telemetry

LIVE BENCHMARK
VS
Anthropic

Claude Opus 4

Elo 1,490
SWE-bench72.5%
Speed (tok/s)58 tok/s
Input / 1M Tokens$15/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$75/1M
MiniMax

MiniMax M2.5

Elo 1,478
SWE-bench75.8%
Speed (tok/s)90 tok/s
Input / 1M Tokens$0.3/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$1.2/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Claude Opus 4 or MiniMax M2.5?
Claude Opus 4 has the higher preference Elo in our latest snapshot (1,490). “Better” still depends on coding, price, and latency — see the table.
Which is better at coding, Claude Opus 4 or MiniMax M2.5?
MiniMax M2.5 leads SWE-bench at 75.8% vs 72.5%. SWE-bench is one harness, not your repo.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
MiniMax M2.5 output tokens are $1.2/1M versus $75/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, Claude Opus 4 or MiniMax M2.5?
MiniMax M2.5 has the lower time-to-first-token (250 ms vs 390 ms). Tokens/sec is a separate column if you care about long completions.
Which has the larger context window?
MiniMax M2.5 accepts 205k tokens versus 200k.
Can I self-host either model?
MiniMax M2.5 is marked open-weights in our catalog. The other side is a closed API. Check the provider license before you ship weights.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Claude Opus 4 and MiniMax M2.5 Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Related news

  • launch · Feb 12, 2026

    MiniMax M2.5: the Feb 2026 SWE-bench specialist still on the board

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All Claude Opus 4 matchups →|All MiniMax M2.5 matchups →
Claude Opus 4 vs Claude 3 Opus (previous opus)Claude Opus 4 vs Claude Opus 4.5 (next opus)Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Claude Opus 4Claude Sonnet 5 vs Claude Opus 4Claude Opus 4.6 vs Claude Opus 4Claude Opus 4.8 vs Claude Opus 4